Cited by 16Insect Resistance and GeneticsGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchInsect Pest Control Strategies

A general approach to test for interaction among mixtures of insecticidal proteins which target different orders of insect pests

Open access
Graser, Gerson, Walters, Frederick S, Burns, Andrea, Sauve, Alaina, Raybould, Alan·2017·Journal of Insect Science

Abstract

A shift toward transgenic crops which produce combinations of insecticidal proteins has increased the interest (Syngenta Seeds, Inc., Minnetonka, MN) in studying the potential for interactions amongst those proteins. We present a general testing method which accommodates proteins with nonoverlapping spectrums of activity. Our sequential testing approach first investigates groups of the proteins with overlapping activity; e.g., proteins active against Lepidoptera or Coleoptera, respectively. The Colby method is used to test for interactions within each respective group. Subsequently, the mixture of proteins within each group is regarded as a single entity and tests for interactions between the groups (when combined) is conducted using analysis of variance. We illustrate the method using Cry1Ab, Vip3Aa20, and Cry1F (a mixture of proteins active against Lepidoptera), and mCry3A and eCry3.1Ab (a mixture of proteins active against Coleoptera). These insecticidal proteins are produced by Bt11 × MIR162 × TC1507 × MIR604 × 5307 maize. We detected no interactions between Cry1Ab, Vip3Aa20, and Cry1F in tests using larvae of two different lepidopteran species, and possible slight antagonism between mCry3A and eCry3.1Ab with a coleopteran test species. We detected no effect of (eCry3.1Ab + mCry3A) on the potency of (Cry1Ab + Vip3Aa20 + Cry1F) to lepidopteran larvae, and no effect of (Cry1Ab + Vip3Aa20 + Cry1F) on the potency of (mCry3A + eCry3.1Ab) to coleopteran larvae. We discuss implications of these results for characterization of Bt11 × MIR162 × TC1507 × MIR604 × 5307 maize, and the value of the method for characterizing other transgenic crops that produce several insecticidal proteins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jisesa/iex003

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pyramided insecticidal proteins typically act additively in sensitive species and cause no unexpected effects in species not sensitive to individual toxins.

    “The available data indicate that these pyramided insecticidal proteins typically act additively in sensitive species and cause no unexpected effects in species that are not sensitive to the individual toxins (Graser et al., 2017;Guo et al., 2016;Haller et al. 2017;Kumar et al., 2014;Levine et al., 2016;Raybould et al., 2012;Shu et al., 2018;Su et al., 2015;Svobodová et al., 2017;Tian et al., 2014T”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Graser et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nespeca M. 1997. Interactive Effects of Imazapyr plus Triclopyr ester and Imazapyr plus Glyphosate Mixtures on Woody Weed Seedlings. M.S. thesis, Virginia Tech. University

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graser, G., Walters, F. S., Burns, A., Sauve, A., & Raybould, A.
Affiliations
  • Syngenta (United States) (US)
  • Syngenta Crop Protection, Product Safety, LLC, Durham, NC, USA
  • Syngenta (Switzerland) (CH)
Corresponding author
Graser, Gerson
Venue
Journal of Insect Science
Published
2017-03-01
Volume
17
Issue
2
ISSN
1536-2442 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2591711989
Cited by
16
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Insect Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
Keywords
insecticidal proteins, protein-protein interaction, Bt maize, Cry1Ab, Cry1F, Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, antagonism, synergistic effect, genetically modified crops, insect resistance
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacterial Proteins, Coleoptera, Biological Assay, Zea mays, Insecticide Resistance, Insecticides, Larva, Lepidoptera, Pest Control, Biological, Plants, Genetically Modified, Biological Control Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review