The Glycemic Load Estimated from the Glycemic Index Does Not Differ Greatly from That Measured Using a Standard Curve in Healthy Volunteers
Open accessAbstract
Glycemic load (GL) is calculated indirectly as glycemic index (GI) times the weight of available carbohydrate. Alternatively, GL may be measured directly using a standard glucose curve. The purpose of this study was to test the agreement between GL values obtained using direct and indirect methods of measurement in 20 healthy volunteers. A standard curve in which glucose dose was plotted against blood glucose incremental area under the curve (iAUC) was generated using beverages containing 0, 12.5, 25, 50, and 75 g glucose. The GI and available carbohydrate content of 5 foods were measured. The foods (white bread, fruit bread, granola bar, instant potato, and chickpeas) were consumed in 3 portion sizes, yielding 15 food/portion size combinations. GL was determined directly by relating the iAUC of a test food to the glucose standard curve. For 12 of 15 food/portion size combinations, GL determined using GI x available carbohydrate did not differ from GL measured from the standard curve (P > 0.05). For 3 of the test products (100 g white bread, and 100- and 150-g granola bars), GI x available carbohydrate was higher than the direct measure. Benefits of the direct measure are that the method does not require testing for available carbohydrate and it allows portion sizes to be tested. For practical purposes, GI x available carbohydrate provided a good estimate of GL, at least under circumstances in which available carbohydrate was measured, and GI and GL were tested in the same gr…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The design of the primary experiment was based on glycaemic index (GI) methodology but used a one-cup serving of rice to reflect the quantity of rice usually eaten rather than a standard dose of carbohydrate.
“The design of the primary experiment was based on glycaemic index (GI) methodology but used a one-cup serving of rice [20] to reflect the quantity of rice usually eaten rather than a standard dose of carbohydrate.”
From Effect of Cold Storage and Reheating of Parboiled Rice on Postprandial Glycaemic Response, Satiety, Palatability and Chewed Particle Size Distribution (2017) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
Dietary Fiber, Glycemic Load, and Risk of Non—insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus in Women
Salmerón, J. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540300040031 · Cited by 1,804 · see citing works
Dietary Fiber, Glycemic Load, and Risk of NIDDM in Men
Salmerón, J., Ascherio, A., Rimm, E. B., Colditz, G. A., Spiegelman, D., Jenkins, D. J., Stampfer, M. J., Wing, A. L., & Willett, W. C. (1997) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.20.4.545 · Cited by 1,426 · see citing works
Liu, S., Willett, W. C., Stampfer, M. J., Hu, F. B., Franz, M., Sampson, L., Hennekens, C. H., & Manson, J. E. (2000) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/71.6.1455 · Cited by 1,166 · see citing works
Brouns, F., Bjorck, I., Frayn, K. N., Gibbs, A. L., Lang, V., Slama, G., & Wolever, T. M. S. (2005) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1079/nrr2005100 · Cited by 1,061 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Glycemic index and glycemic load: measurement issues and their effect on diet–disease relationships
Venn, B. J., & Green, T. J. (2007) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602942 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Self-citationGalgani, J., Aguirre, C., & Díaz, E. (2006) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2891-5-22 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Meng, H., Matthan, N. R., Ausman, L. M., & Lichtenstein, A. H. (2017) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.116.144162 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Lu, L., Venn, B., Lu, J., Monro, J., & Rush, E. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9050475 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“The design of the primary experiment was based on glycaemic index (GI) methodology but used a one-cup serving of rice [20] to reflect the quantity of rice usually eaten rather than a standard dose of carbohydrate.”
MethodSelf-citation
- Authors
- Venn, B. J., Wallace, A. J., Monro, J. A., Perry, T., Brown, R., Frampton, C., & Green, T. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Venn, Bernard J
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1377-1381
- ISSN
- 0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1960829014
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Keywords
- glycemic load, glycemic index, incremental area under the curve, available carbohydrates, measurement agreement, portion size, white bread, granola bars, chickpea, healthy volunteers
- MeSH terms
- Blood Glucose, Bread, Dietary Carbohydrates, Female, Humans, Male, Solanum tuberosum, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Cicer, Glycemic Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review