Cited by 110Food composition and propertiesDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseNutritional Studies and Diet

Effect of macronutrients and fiber on postprandial glycemic responses and meal glycemic index and glycemic load value determinations

Open access
Meng, Huicui, Matthan, Nirupa R, Ausman, Lynne M, Lichtenstein, Alice H·2017·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background: The potential confounding effect of different amounts and proportions of macronutrients across eating patterns on meal or dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) value determinations has remained partially unaddressed.Objective: The study aimed to determine the effects of different amounts of macronutrients and fiber on measured meal GI and GL values.Design: Four studies were conducted during which participants [n = 20-22; women: 50%; age: 50-80 y; body mass index (in kg/m 2): 25-30)] received food challenges containing different amounts of the variable nutrient in a random order. Added to the standard 50 g available carbohydrate from white bread was 12.5, 25, or 50 g carbohydrate; 12.5, 25, or 50 g protein; and 5.6, 11.1, or 22.2 g fat from rice cereal, tuna, and unsalted butter, respectively, and 4.8 or 9.6 g fiber from oat cereal. Arterialized venous blood was sampled for 2 h, and measured meal GI and GL and insulin index (II) values were calculated by using the incremental area under the curve (AUC i) method.Results: Adding carbohydrate to the standard white-bread challenge increased glucose AUC i (P < 0.0001), measured meal GI (P = 0.0066), and mean GL (P < 0.0001). Adding protein (50 g only) decreased glucose AUC i (P = 0.0026), measured meal GI (P = 0.0139), and meal GL (P = 0.0140). Adding fat or fiber had no significant effect on these variables. Adding carbohydrate (50 g), protein (50 g), and fat (11.1 g) increased the insulin AUC i or II; fiber had no effect.Conclusions: These data indicate that uncertainty in the determination of meal GI and GL values is introduced when carbohydrate-containing foods are consumed concurrently with protein (equal amount of carbohydrate challenge) but not with carbohydrate-, fat-, or fiber-containing foods. Future studies are needed to evaluate whether this uncertainty also influences the prediction of average dietary GI and GL values for eating patterns. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01023646.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.116.144162

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The glycemic response depends on many factors including the amount of total consumed carbohydrates, carbohydrate type, starch type, food preparation, other macronutrients in foods, and physiological organic functions.

    “The glycemic response depends on many factors including the amount of total consumed carbohydrates, carbohydrate type, starch type (i.e., resistant starch), food preparation (i.e., gelatinization, bran size), other macronutrients in foods (i.e., fat, protein, fiber), and the physiological organic functions (stomach, pancreatic and enteral hydrolysis, gastric emptying, intestinal absorption rate of”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meng, H., Matthan, N. R., Ausman, L. M., & Lichtenstein, A. H.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Lichtenstein, Alice H
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
105
Issue
4
Pages
842-853
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2588260322
Cited by
110
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8
FWCI
8.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (58‐1950‐4‐401)
  • National Institutes of Health (58-1950-4-401)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 0733221)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
glycemic index, glycemic load, macronutrients, dietary fiber, proteins, dietary fat, carbohydrates, postprandial glycemic response, insulin index, food challenge, white bread, rice cereal, tuna, incremental area under the curve, measurement uncertainty, dietary habits, older women, postprandial insulin response, postprandial blood glucose
MeSH terms
Glycemic Load, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Glucose, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Fiber, Dietary Proteins, Female, Humans, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Postprandial Period, Area Under Curve, Glycemic Index, Meals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review