Cited by 10Fatty Acid Research and HealthHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlBirth, Development, and Health

DHA supplementation during pregnancy enhances maternal vagally mediated cardiac autonomic control in humans

Open access
Christifano, Danielle N, Chollet-Hinton, Lynn, Mathis, Nicole B, Gajewski, Byron J, Carlson, Susan E, Colombo, John, Gustafson, Kathleen M·2022·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Background DHA is an essential omega-3 (ω-3; n-3) fatty acid that has well-established benefits for the fetus. DHA also has the potential to influence the health of the mother, but this area is understudied. Objectives The objective of this secondary analysis was to determine if DHA was related to maternal heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) metrics in a large cohort of pregnant women. Methods In the parent trial (1R01HD086001) eligible participants (≥18 y old, English speaking, carrying a singleton pregnancy, 12-20 wk of gestation) were randomly assigned to consume 200 mg/d or 800 mg/d DHA for the duration of their pregnancy (n = 300). Weight, blood pressure, and magnetocardiograms (MCGs) were collected at 32 wk and 36 wk of gestation (n = 221). Measures of HR and HRV in time-, frequency-, and nonlinear-domains were determined from the isolated maternal MCG. Treatment group and timepoint were examined as predictors in association with HR and HRV metrics using random-intercept mixed-effects ANOVA unadjusted and adjusted models accounting for weight and dietary DHA intake. Results Women receiving the higher dose of DHA (800 mg/d) during pregnancy had lower HR, lower sympathetic index, higher vagally mediated HRV indices, and greater HRV complexity when compared with the women who received the lower dose (200 mg/d; all P Conclusions DHA supplementation increases vagal tone in pregnant women. Longitudinal studies examining the potential link between DHA, enhanced va…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jn/nxac178

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christifano, D. N., Chollet-Hinton, L., Mathis, N. B., Gajewski, B. J., Carlson, S. E., Colombo, J., & Gustafson, K. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Christifano, Danielle N
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
152
Issue
12
Pages
2708-2715
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4291012186
Cited by
10
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1R01HD086001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
docosahexaenoic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, prenatal supplementation, pregnancy, vagal tone, cardiac autonomic control, heart rate variability, magnetocardiography, maternal heart rate, nonlinear HRV measures, preterm birth
MeSH terms
Docosahexaenoic Acids, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Mothers, Pregnancy, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Dietary Supplements, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review