Cited by 12Fatty Acid Research and HealthAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesNutritional Studies and Diet

Omega-3 and risk of atrial fibrillation: vagally-mediated double-edged sword

Open access
O'Keefe, Evan L., O'Keefe, James H., Abuissa, Hussam, Metzinger, Mark, Murray, Ellen, Franco, Grant, Lavie, Carl J., Harris, William S.·2025·Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Abstract

Objective Studies regarding effects of omega-3 fatty acids, specifically eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), on risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) have reported discordant results. The aim of this review is to clarify effects of marine omega-3 intake on risk of AF. Patients and methods A PubMed search was performed using terms: atrial fibrillation, omega-3, EPA, DHA, vagal tone. We summarized findings from randomized clinical trials (RCTs), epidemiology studies, and meta-analyses evaluating effects/associations of DHA + EPA on risk of AF. Also, vagal tone was explored as a mediator between omega-3 and risk of AF. Results Meta-analyses of 8 RCTs and 17 prospective cohort studies comprised of 83,112 and 54,799 individuals, respectively, investigated the link between omega-3 intake and incident AF. The RCTs reported that treatment with DHA and/or EPA was associated with a 24 % increased relative risk of AF (absolute risk 4.0 % vs 3.3 %; relative risk [RR] 1.24, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.38, p = 0.0002). This was dose-dependent; DHA + EPA doses of ∼1000 mg/d increased AF risk ∼12 %, whereas 1800 to 4000 mg/d increased AF risk by ∼50 %. In contrast, observational studies focused on DHA + EPA blood levels or dietary intake have generally reported that higher omega-3 levels/consumption are associated with lower AF risk. Maximal AF risk reduction. (12 %) occurred at ∼650 mg/d of dietary DHA + EPA. Other studies have indicated that omega-3 fatty acids can dose-dependently increase vagal tone, which could explain the biphasic relationship between DHA + EPA and AF risk. Experimental studies show that low-level vagal stimulation decreases risk of AF, whereas high-level vagal stimulation increases risk of AF. Conclusion Higher consumption of dietary omega-3 is associated with decreased AF risk. In contrast, pharmaceutical dosing of omega-3 increases AF in a dose-dependent manner, which may be mediated by vagal tone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pcad.2024.11.003

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dose-dependent vagal-stimulating effects of omega-3 are likely especially problematic for individuals at high risk for bradycardia-dependent AF, including endurance athletes, untreated obstructive sleep apnea, sick sinus syndrome, and chronically slow heart rates.

    “The dose-dependent vagal-stimulating effects are likely to be especially problematic for individuals at high risk for bradycardia-dependent AF124. This includes individuals who perform high volumes of strenuous endurance exercise, patients with untreated obstructive sleep apnea, sick sinus syndrome and chronically slow heart rates124.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]Qian F, Tintle N, Lemaitre RN, Harris WS, O’Keefe JH, Mozaffarian D. Omega-3 fatty acids biomarkers and incident atrial fibrillaton: an individual participant-level pooled analysis of 17 international prospective studies. JACC. 2023; 82(4): 336– 349 37769813

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Keefe, E. L., O'Keefe, J. H., Abuissa, H., Metzinger, M., Murray, E., Franco, G., Lavie, C. J., & Harris, W. S.
Affiliations
  • Creighton University (US)
  • University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
  • University of South Dakota (US)
Venue
Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-07
Volume
91
Pages
3-9
ISSN
0033-0620 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404875949
Cited by
12
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (T32HL110837)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, atrial fibrillation, vagal tone, dose-dependent effects, omega-3 supplementation, arrhythmia risk
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Docosahexaenoic Acids, Heart Rate, Humans, Risk Factors, Vagus Nerve, Eicosapentaenoic Acid, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Risk Assessment, Dietary Supplements, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review