Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cancer Mortality Among Diabetics 2

·1970·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

Cancer mortality was ascertained among 21,447 diabetic patients who registered at a large diabetes clinic in Boston during a 26-year period ending in 1956. Observations were made through 1959. Analysis was by the calculation of standardized mortality ratios in which observed numbers of deaths were compared with numbers expected if the age- and sex-specific rates in the general Massachusetts population observed over the same period of time applied. Total cancer mortality among the female diabetics occurred at approximately the expected frequency. By contrast, the male diabetics experienced a significantly reduced risk of cancer death that persisted even after the exclusion of deaths from lung cancer. This decreased cancer risk was believed attributable to two factors: a) an especially excessive risk of deaths from other causes, excluding cancer and b) an over-representation of Jews among the patients. The positive association between cancer and diabetes, reported in many clinical studies, is believed to be explained by the well-documented metabolic differences between normal and malignant tissues and by the failure of these studies to identify the antecedent disease. That diabetics have a significantly increased risk of death from pancreatic cancer was confirmed by this study. It is suggested that the carcinogenic potentialities of exogenous animal insulins be investigated, particularly in view of their known antigenic and teratogenic properties in laboratory animals. This study offers evidence that diabetic females do not have increased risk of death from cancer of the uterine corpus. Earlier clinical reports of a high prevalence of diabetes among endometrial cancer patients almost invariably were based on retrospective observations which made it difficult to identify with certainty the antecedent disease. Mortality from lung cancer was reduced significantly among the male diabetics, but not among the females. An over-representation among the Jewish male patients (with their known diminished lung cancer risk) is believed responsible, at least in part. However, reduced lung cancer risk among diabetics independent of religion cannot be excluded. The possibility of differences in the cigarette smoking habits of diabetics and nondiabetics could not be examined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/44.3.673

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 212

Metadata

Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
1970-03
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
673-86
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2109685961
Cited by
212
References
0
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Mortality Among Diabetics 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/44.3.673
The paper
Cancer Mortality Among Diabetics 2. (1970). JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/44.3.673

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.