Cited by 685Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchMetabolism, Diabetes, and CancerCancer Risks and Factors

Diabetes mellitus and risk of pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of cohort studies

Ben, Qiwen, Xu, Maojin, Ning, Xiaoyan, Liu, Jun, Hong, Shangyou, Huang, Wen, Zhang, Huagao, Li, Zhaoshen·2011·European Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) is widely considered to be associated with risk of pancreatic cancer (PaC), however, whether DM is a cause or a consequence of PaC is still controversial. We examined this association by conducting a detailed meta-analysis of cohort studies.Methods Studies were identified by searching Medline and Embase through November 30, 2010. Summary relative risks (RRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model.Results A total of thirty-five cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. DM was associated with an increased risk of PaC (the summary RRs=1.94; 95% CI, 1.66-2.27), with significant evidence of heterogeneity among these studies (p<0.001, I²=93.6%). Subgroup analyses revealed that the increased risk of PaC was independent of geographic locations, sex, study design, alcohol consumption, body mass index (BMI) and smoking status. In addition, the relative risk of PaC was correlated negatively with the duration of DM, with the highest risk of PaC found among patients diagnosed within less than 1 year. There was no significant publication bias (p=0.136 for Egger's regression asymmetry test).Conclusions Findings from this meta-analysis strongly support that diabetes is associated with an increased risk of PaC in both males and females and that DM is both an early manifestation and an etiologic factor of pancreatic cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.03.003

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ben, Q., Xu, M., Ning, X., Liu, J., Hong, S., Huang, W., Zhang, H., & Li, Z.
Affiliations
  • Second Military Medical University (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Zhaoshen
Venue
European Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
47
Issue
13
Pages
1928-1937
ISSN
0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079673038
Cited by
685
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 34
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, pancreatic cancer, cancer risk, diabetes duration, alcohol consumption, body mass index, smoking, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review