The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prostate Carcinogenesis in N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (NMU)-Testosterone-Treated Rats Fed Tomato Powder, Lycopene, or Energy-Restricted Diets
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Consumption of tomato products or lycopene and energy restriction have been hypothesized to reduce the risk of human prostate cancer. We investigated the effects of these dietary variables in a rat model of prostate carcinogenesis. METHODS: Male rats (n = 194) treated with N-methyl-N-nitrosourea and testosterone to induce prostate cancer were fed diets containing whole tomato powder (13 mg lycopene/kg diet), lycopene beadlets (161 mg lycopene/kg diet), or control beadlets. Rats in each group were randomly assigned to either ad libitum feeding or 20% diet restriction. Differences between Kaplan-Meier survival curves for diet composition or restriction were tested with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were developed to examine the combined effect of diet composition and restriction on survival. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Risk of death with prostate cancer was lower for rats fed the tomato powder diet than for rats fed control beadlets (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59 to 0.93; P =.009). In contrast, prostate cancer-specific mortality of the control and lycopene-fed rats was similar (P =.63). The proportions of rats dying with prostate cancer in the control, lycopene, and tomato powder groups were 80% (95% CI = 68% to 89%), 72% (95% CI = 60% to 83%), and 62% (95% CI = 48% to 75%), respectively. Rats in the diet-restricted group experienced longer prostate cancer-free survival than rats in the ad libitum-fed group (HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.96; P =.029). The proportion of rats that developed prostate cancer was 79% (95% CI = 69% to 86%) for ad libitum-fed rats and 65% (95% CI = 54% to 74%) for rats fed restricted diets. No interactions were observed between diet composition and dietary restriction. CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of tomato powder but not lycopene inhibited prostate carcinogenesis, suggesting that tomato products contain compounds in addition to lycopene that modify prostate carcinogenesis. Diet restriction also reduced the risk of prostate cancer. Tomato phytochemicals and diet restriction may act by independent mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bouayed, J., & Bohn, T. (2010) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.4161/oxim.3.4.12858 · Cited by 1,095
Jensen, J. D. (2008) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00324.x · Cited by 298
Moran, N. E., Mohn, E. S., Hason, N., Erdman, J. W., & Johnson, E. J. (2018) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmy025 · Cited by 205
Mein, J. R., Lian, F., & Wang, X.-D. (2008) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00120.x · Cited by 191
Cooperstone, J. L., Tober, K. L., Riedl, K. M., Teegarden, M. D., Cichon, M. J., Francis, D. M., Schwartz, S. J., & Oberyszyn, T. M. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05568-7 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Boileau, T. W.-M.
- Venue
- CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-11-05
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 1578-1586
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2143086468
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prostate Carcinogenesis in N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (NMU)-Testosterone-Treated Rats Fed Tomato Powder, Lycopene, or Energy-Restricted Diets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djg081
- The paper
- Boileau, T. W.-M. (2003). Prostate Carcinogenesis in N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (NMU)-Testosterone-Treated Rats Fed Tomato Powder, Lycopene, or Energy-Restricted Diets. CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djg081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.