Cited by 684Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsEstrogen and related hormone effectsBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Continuing Outcomes Relevant to Evista: Breast Cancer Incidence in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women in a Randomized Trial of Raloxifene

Open access
Martino, S., Cauley, J. A., Barrett-Connor, E., Powles, T. J., Mershon, J., Disch, D., Secrest, R. J., Cummings, S. R. +1 more·2004·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The randomized, double-blind Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial found that 4 years of raloxifene therapy decreased the incidence of invasive breast cancer among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by 72% compared with placebo. We conducted the Continuing Outcomes Relevant to Evista (CORE) trial to examine the effect of 4 additional years of raloxifene therapy on the incidence of invasive breast cancer in women in MORE who agreed to continue in CORE. METHODS: Women who had been randomly assigned to receive raloxifene (either 60 or 120 mg/day) in MORE were assigned to receive raloxifene (60 mg/day) in CORE (n = 3510), and women who had been assigned to receive placebo in MORE continued on placebo in CORE (n = 1703). Breast cancer incidence was analyzed by a log-rank test, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: During the CORE trial, the 4-year incidences of invasive breast cancer and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive invasive breast cancer were reduced by 59% (HR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.71) and 66% (HR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.66), respectively, in the raloxifene group compared with the placebo group. There was no difference between the two groups in incidence of ER-negative invasive breast cancer during CORE (P = .86). Over the 8 years of both trials, the incidences of invasive breast cancer and ER-positive invasive breast cancer were reduced by 66% (HR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.50) and 76% (HR = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.40), respectively, in the raloxifene group compared with the placebo group. During the CORE trial, the relative risk of thromboembolism in the raloxifene group compared with that in the placebo group was 2.17 (95% CI = 0.83 to 5.70). This increased risk, also observed in the MORE trial, persisted over the 8 years of both trials. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in invasive breast cancer incidence continues beyond 4 years of raloxifene treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. No new safety concerns related to raloxifene therapy were identified during CORE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djh319

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Raloxifene is indicated for the reduction in risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

    “Raloxifene is also indicated for the reduction in risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis [83–86].”

    From Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis (2014) · cites this paper as [84]

    The introduction (p. 1) says raloxifene was approved for preventing and treating postmenopausal osteoporosis, while tamoxifen was the only agent approved in the United States to reduce breast cancer incidence. Although the CORE results (p. 5) show reduced invasive breast cancer incidence with raloxifene, they do not support the claim that breast cancer risk reduction was an approved indication. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5](5) Cummings S, Eckert S, Krueger K, Grady D, Powles T, Cauley J, et al. The effect of raloxifene on risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. JAMA 1999;281:2189-97. -
  2. [21](21) National Cancer Institute. SEER Cancer Statistics Review. Kikuchi Y, Hirata J, Kita T, Imaizumi E, Tode T, Nagata I. 1997. Bethesda, MD. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martino, S., Cauley, J. A., Barrett-Connor, E., Powles, T. J., Mershon, J., Disch, D., Secrest, R. J., Cummings, S. R., & For the CORE Investigators
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Martino, S.
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2004-11-30
Volume
96
Issue
23
Pages
1751-1761
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2166760402
Cited by
684
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 48
FWCI
37.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • School of Medicine, Indiana University
  • Pfizer Pharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
raloxifene, breast cancer incidence, postmenopausal women, osteoporosis, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer, thromboembolism, MORE trial, selective estrogen receptor modulators, breast cancer prevention, cardiovascular events, bone mineral density, hormone replacement therapy, tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors
MeSH terms
Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, United States, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Incidence, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal, Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators, Estrogen Receptor Modulators, Raloxifene Hydrochloride

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review