Cited by 423Angiogenesis and VEGF in CancerCancer Cells and MetastasisMathematical Biology Tumor Growth

A model of human tumor dormancy: an angiogenic switch from the nonangiogenic phenotype

Open access
Naumov, George N., Bender, Elise, Zurakowski, David, Kang, Soo-Young, Sampson, David, Flynn, Evelyn, Watnick, Randolph S., Straume, Oddbjorn +3 more·2006·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microscopic human cancers can remain dormant for life. Tumor progression depends on sequential events, including a switch to the angiogenic phenotype, i.e., initial recruitment of new vessels. We previously demonstrated that human tumors contain tumor cell populations that are heterogeneous in angiogenic activity. Here, we separated angiogenic from nonangiogenic human tumor cell populations and compared their growth. METHODS: Severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice were inoculated with nonangiogenic human MDA-MB-436 breast adenocarcinoma, KHOS-24OS osteosarcoma, or T98G glioblastoma cells. Most of the resulting tumors remained microscopic (<1 mm diameter), but some eventually became angiogenic and enlarged and were used to isolate angiogenic tumor cells. Angiogenic and nonangiogenic tumor cells were inoculated into SCID mice, and time to the development of palpable tumors was determined. Cell proliferation was assayed in vitro by growth curves and in vivo by staining for proliferating cell nuclear antigen or Ki67. Microscopic tumors from both tumor cell populations were examined for histologic evidence of vascular development 14 days after inoculation in mice. Expression of the angiogenesis inhibitor thrombospondin-1 was examined by immunoblotting. RESULTS: Nonangiogenic tumors of each tumor type developed palpable tumors after means of 119 days (range: 53-185 days) for breast cancer, 238 days (184-291 days) for osteosarcoma, and 226 days (150-301 days) for glioblastoma. Angiogenic cells developed palpable tumors within 20 days after inoculation. However, nonangiogenic and angiogenic cells of each tumor type had similar proliferation rates. Fourteen days after tumor cell inoculation, tumors from angiogenic cells showed evidence of functional vasculature. In contrast, nonangiogenic tumors remained microscopic in size with absent or nonfunctional vasculature. Thrombospondin-1 expression was statistically significantly lower (by five- to 23-fold, depending on tumor type) in angiogenic than nonangiogenic cells. CONCLUSIONS: This model provides a conceptual framework and a reproducible in vivo system to study unresolved central questions in cancer biology regarding the initiation, reversibility, and molecular regulation of the timing of the angiogenic switch.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djj068

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors' in vivo mouse model showed tumor growth kinetics and incidence similar to dormant cancer cell line models, unlike studies using aggressive cancer cell lines that often produce tumors larger than 100 mm3 within a month after implantation.

    “Importantly, our in vivo mouse model displayed tumor growth kinetics and incidence similar to dormant cancer cell line models [93–96], in contrast to studies relying on aggressive cancer cell lines and resulting often into >100mm3 tumors less than a month after implantation [7].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naumov, G. N., Bender, E., Zurakowski, D., Kang, S.-Y., Sampson, D., Flynn, E., Watnick, R. S., Straume, O., Akslen, L. A., Folkman, J., & Almog, N.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Naumov, George N.
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2006-03-01
Volume
98
Issue
5
Pages
316-325
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2136379419
Cited by
423
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 36
FWCI
15.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Keywords
tumor dormancy, angiogenic switch, tumor angiogenesis, tumor heterogeneity, thrombospondin-1, tumor cell proliferation, tumor vasculature, breast adenocarcinoma, osteosarcoma, glioblastoma, tumor growth kinetics
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Animals, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Glioblastoma, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Phenotype, Osteosarcoma, Time Factors, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Immunoblotting, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Fibroblast Growth Factor 2, Mice, SCID, Thrombospondin 1, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review