Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 566

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 Vaccine on All HPV-Associated Genital Diseases in Young Women

Open access
Muñoz, Nubia, Kjaer, Susanne K., Sigurdsson, Kristján, Iversen, Ole-Erik, Hernandez-Avila, Mauricio, Wheeler, Cosette M., Perez, Gonzalo, Brown, Darron R., Koutsky, Laura A., Tay, Eng Hseon, Garcia, Patricía J., Ault, Kevin A., Garland, Suzanne M., Leodolter, Sepp, Olsson, Sven-Eric, Tang, Grace W. K., Ferris, Daron G., Paavonen, Jorma, Steben, Marc, Bosch, F. Xavier, Dillner, Joakim, Huh, Warner K., Joura, Elmar A., Kurman, Robert J., Majewski, Slawomir, Myers, Evan R., Villa, Luisa L., Taddeo, Frank J., Roberts, Christine, Tadesse, Amha, Bryan, Janine T., Lupinacci, Lisa C., Giacoletti, Katherine E. D., Sings, Heather L., James, Margaret K., Hesley, Teresa M., Barr, Eliav, Haupt, Richard M.·2010·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of the prophylactic vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, and 18 (HPV6/11/16/18) on all HPV-associated genital disease was investigated in a population that approximates sexually naive women in that they were "negative to 14 HPV types" and in a mixed population of HPV-exposed and -unexposed women (intention-to-treat group). METHODS: This analysis studied 17 622 women aged 15-26 years who were enrolled in one of two randomized, placebo-controlled, efficacy trials for the HPV6/11/16/18 vaccine (first patient on December 28, 2001, and studies completed July 31, 2007). Vaccine or placebo was given at day 1, month 2, and month 6. All women underwent cervicovaginal sampling and Papanicolaou (Pap) testing at day 1 and every 6-12 months thereafter. Outcomes were any cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; any external anogenital and vaginal lesions; Pap test abnormalities; and procedures such as colposcopy and definitive therapy. Absolute rates are expressed as women with endpoint per 100 person-years at risk. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 3.6 years (maximum of 4.9 years). In the population that was negative to 14 HPV types, vaccination was up to 100% effective in reducing the risk of HPV16/18-related high-grade cervical, vulvar, and vaginal lesions and of HPV6/11-related genital warts. In the intention-to-treat group, vaccination also statistically significantly reduced the risk of any high-grade cervical lesions (19.0% reduction; rate vaccine = 1.43, rate placebo = 1.76, difference = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13 to 0.54), vulvar and vaginal lesions (50.7% reduction; rate vaccine = 0.10, rate placebo = 0.20, difference = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.16), genital warts (62.0% reduction; rate vaccine = 0.44, rate placebo = 1.17, difference = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.87), Pap abnormalities (11.3% reduction; rate vaccine = 10.36, rate placebo = 11.68, difference = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.74 to 1.90), and cervical definitive therapy (23.0% reduction; rate vaccine = 1.97, rate placebo = 2.56, difference = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.83), irrespective of causal HPV type. CONCLUSIONS: High-coverage HPV vaccination programs among adolescents and young women may result in a rapid reduction of genital warts, cervical cytological abnormalities, and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. In the longer term, substantial reductions in the rates of cervical, vulvar, and vaginal cancers may follow.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djp534

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 566

Metadata

Authors
Muñoz, N., Kjaer, S. K., Sigurdsson, K., Iversen, O.-E., Hernandez-Avila, M., Wheeler, C. M., Perez, G., Brown, D. R., Koutsky, L. A., Tay, E. H., Garcia, P. J., Ault, K. A., Garland, S. M., Leodolter, S., Olsson, S.-E., Tang, G. W. K., Ferris, D. G., Paavonen, J., Steben, M., Bosch, F. X., Dillner, J., Huh, W. K., Joura, E. A., Kurman, R. J., Majewski, S., Myers, E. R., Villa, L. L., Taddeo, F. J., Roberts, C., Tadesse, A., Bryan, J. T., Lupinacci, L. C., Giacoletti, K. E. D., Sings, H. L., James, M. K., Hesley, T. M., Barr, E., & Haupt, R. M.
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2010-03-03
Volume
102
Issue
5
Pages
325-339
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2166806711
Cited by
566
References
3
FWCI
43.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 Vaccine on All HPV-Associated Genital Diseases in Young Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djp534
The paper
Muñoz, N., Kjaer, S. K., Sigurdsson, K., Iversen, O.-E., Hernandez-Avila, M., Wheeler, C. M., Perez, G., Brown, D. R., Koutsky, L. A., Tay, E. H., Garcia, P. J., Ault, K. A., Garland, S. M., Leodolter, S., Olsson, S.-E., Tang, G. W. K., Ferris, D. G., Paavonen, J., Steben, M., . . . Haupt, R. M. (2010). Impact of Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 Vaccine on All HPV-Associated Genital Diseases in Young Women. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp534

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.