The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toxicity of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors are associated with consistent improvements in disease-free survival but not in overall survival. We conducted a literature-based meta-analysis of randomized trials to examine whether the relative toxicity of aromatase inhibitors compared with tamoxifen may explain this finding. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to identify randomized controlled trials that compared aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen as primary adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and databases of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), absolute risks, and the number needed to harm associated with one adverse event were computed for prespecified serious adverse events including cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, bone fractures, thromboembolic events, endometrial carcinoma and other second cancers not including new breast cancer. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Seven trials enrolling 30,023 patients met the inclusion criteria. Longer duration of aromatase inhibitor use was associated with increased odds of developing cardiovascular disease (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.43, P < .001; number needed to harm = 132) and bone fractures (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.34 to 1.61, P < .001; number needed to harm = 46), but a decreased odds of venous thrombosis (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.64, P < .001; number needed to harm = 79) and endometrial carcinoma (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.53, P < .001; number needed to harm = 258). Five years of aromatase inhibitors was associated with a non-statistically significant increased odds of death without recurrence compared with 5 years of tamoxifen alone or tamoxifen for 2-3 years followed by an aromatase inhibitor for 2-3 years (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.26, P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative toxicity of aromatase inhibitors when used as up-front treatment may explain the lack of overall survival benefit despite improvements in disease-free survival. Switching from tamoxifen to aromatase inhibitors reduces this toxicity and is likely the best balance between efficacy and toxicity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Cuzick, J., Sestak, I., Baum, M., Buzdar, A., Howell, A., Dowsett, M., & Forbes, J. F. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70257-6 · Cited by 1,674
Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests
Deeks, J. J. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157 · Cited by 1,340
Goss, P. E., Ingle, J. N., Martino, S., Robert, N. J., Muss, H. B., Piccart, M. J., Castiglione, M., Tu, D., Shepherd, L. E., Pritchard, K. I., et al. (2005) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/dji250 · Cited by 1,118
(2008) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70385-6 · Cited by 919
Coates, A. S., Keshaviah, A., Thürlimann, B., Mouridsen, H., Mauriac, L., Forbes, J. F., Paridaens, R., Castiglione-Gertsch, M., Gelber, R. D., Colleoni, M., et al. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.08.8617 · Cited by 910
Coombes, R., Kilburn, L., Snowdon, C., Paridaens, R., Coleman, R., Jones, S., Jassem, J., Van de Velde, C., Delozier, T., Alvarez, I., et al. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60200-1 · Cited by 907
Aromatase Inhibitors in Breast Cancer
Smith, I. E., & Dowsett, M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra023246 · Cited by 905
Jakesz, R., Jonat, W., Gnant, M., Mittlboeck, M., Greil, R., Tausch, C., Hilfrich, J., Kwasny, W., Menzel, C., Samonigg, H., et al. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67059-6 · Cited by 879
Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests
(2001) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 850
Cited by
Hughes, K. S., Schnaper, L. A., Bellon, J. R., Cirrincione, C. T., Berry, D. A., McCormick, B., Muss, H. B., Smith, B. L., Hudis, C. A., Winer, E. P., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.45.2615 · Cited by 1,310
Sex differences in heart failure
Lam, C. S. P., Arnott, C., Beale, A. L., Chandramouli, C., Hilfiker-Kleiner, D., Kaye, D. M., Ky, B., Santema, B. T., Sliwa, K., & Voors, A. A. (2019) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz835 · Cited by 802
Regan, M. M., Neven, P., Giobbie-Hurder, A., Goldhirsch, A., Ejlertsen, B., Mauriac, L., Forbes, J. F., Smith, I., Láng, I., Wardley, A., et al. (2011) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70270-4 · Cited by 406
Breast-Conserving Surgery with or without Irradiation in Early Breast Cancer
Kunkler, I. H., Williams, L. J., Jack, W. J. L., Cameron, D. A., & Dixon, J. M. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2207586 · Cited by 401
Bodai, B. I., & Tuso, P. (2015) · The Permanente Journal · doi:10.7812/tpp/14-241 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- Amir, E., Seruga, B., Niraula, S., Carlsson, L., & Ocaña, A.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-08-22
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1299-1309
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2144133819
- Cited by
- 622
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxicity of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djr242
- The paper
- Amir, E., Seruga, B., Niraula, S., Carlsson, L., & Ocaña, A. (2011). Toxicity of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.