The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers
Abstract
Studies of the association between innovation characteristics and innovation adoption at the level of organization are scarce. This study develops direct and moderating hypotheses for the relationship between innovation characteristics, manager characteristics, and innovation adoption in public organizations. The hypotheses are tested using survey data on the adoption of 25 innovations in 725 local governments in the United States and data from a panel of experts. The findings suggest that both innovation characteristics and manager characteristics influence the adoption of innovation; however, they do not reveal significant moderating effects of manager characteristics on the relationship between innovation characteristics and innovation adoption. The implications of the findings are discussed for further research on innovation adoption in the public sector.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis
He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0078 · Cited by 3,737
Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation
Finkelstein, S. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256485 · Cited by 2,389
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x · Cited by 1,296
Self-citationOrganizational context, climate and innovativeness: adoption of imaging technology
Nystrom, P. C., Ramamurthy, K., & Wilson, A. L. (2002) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/s0923-4748(02)00019-x · Cited by 263
Research works printed but not linked: 104
- 1986, Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 38, 405, 10.1016/0749-5978(86)90009-9 · DOI
- 1989, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 10, 107, 10.1002/smj.4250100709 · DOI
- 1990, RESEARCH POLICY, 19, 215, 10.1016/0048-7333(90)90037-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 2000, Public administration review, 60, 409, 10.1111/0033-3352.00104 · DOI
- 2007, Public administration review, 67, 488, 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00731.x · DOI
- 1994, Public administration review, 54, 322, 10.2307/977379 · DOI · Paper page
- 1998, Public administration review, 58, 293, 10.2307/977559 · DOI
- 2000, THE LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 11, 515, 10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00057-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 2000, Public administration review, 60, 498, 10.1111/0033-3352.00113 · DOI · Paper page
- 1999, AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 29, 19, 10.1177/02750749922064256 · DOI · Paper page
- 2002, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 39, 97, 10.1111/1467-6486.00284 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 23, 419, 10.1068/c40m · DOI
- 2003, PUBLIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 26, 345, 10.1177/1530957603026004003 · DOI
- 1999, Public administration review, 59, 19, 10.2307/977476 · DOI
- 1985, The Journal of applied psychology, 17, 108
- Carpenter, 2004, Journal of Management, 30, 749, 10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001 · DOI
- Camison-Zornoza, 2004, Organization Studies, 25, 331, 10.1177/0170840604040039 · DOI · Paper page
- Choudhury, 2007, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27, 264, 10.1177/0734371X06297464 · DOI
- 1978, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 21, 193, 10.2307/255754 · DOI · Paper page
- 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 34, 555, 10.2307/256406 · DOI · Paper page
- 1984, Administrative science quarterly, 29, 392, 10.2307/2393031 · DOI
- 2006, JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 23, 269, 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2006.08.002 · DOI
- 2001, Public administration review, 61, 693, 10.1111/0033-3352.00140 · DOI
- 1998, 76, 539, 10.1111/1467-9299.00116 · DOI
- 1986, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 32, 1422, 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422 · DOI · Paper page
- 1992, IEEE SPECTRUM, 29, 21
- 1976, Administrative science quarterly, 21, 700, 10.2307/2391725 · DOI · Paper page
- Drucker, 1985, Harvard business review, 63, 67
- 1990, Psychological bulletin, 108, 233, 10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.233 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 26, 665, 10.1002/smj.469 · DOI · Paper page
- Elenkov, 2005, Journal of Management, 31, 381, 10.1177/0149206304272151 · DOI · Paper page
- 1984, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 30, 682, 10.1287/mnsc.30.6.682 · DOI · Paper page
- Fennell, 1984, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 27, 113, 10.2307/255960 · DOI
- Finkelstein, 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 35, 505, 10.2307/256485 · DOI · Paper page
- 1972, Annual review of psychology, 23, 487, 10.1146/annurev.ps.23.020172.002415 · DOI
- Fliegel, 1966, AJS; American journal of sociology, 72, 235, 10.1086/224292 · DOI
- 1999, Public administration review, 59, 231, 10.2307/3109951 · DOI
- 2008, REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH, 25, 253, 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00326.x · DOI
- 1997, RESEARCH POLICY, 26, 537, 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00030-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 1996, 35, 117, 10.1016/0148-2963(95)00053-4 · DOI
- 1997, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 27, 270, 10.1177/027507409702700304 · DOI
- 1994, JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 11, 95, 10.1016/0923-4748(94)90001-9 · DOI
- 2000, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 47, 14, 10.1109/17.820722 · DOI
- 1973, Administrative science quarterly, 18, 279, 10.2307/2391664 · DOI
- 1995, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 38, 1427, 10.2307/256864 · DOI · Paper page
- 1989, RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 9, 369
- 1984, Academy of management review. Academy of Management, 9, 193, 10.5465/amr.1984.4277628 · DOI · Paper page
- 1998, PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 58, 522
- 1990, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 11, 29
- 2002, Public administration review, 62, 434, 10.1111/0033-3352.00197 · DOI · Paper page
- Hoffman, 1993, Journal of Management, 19, 549, 10.1016/0149-2063(93)90004-7 · DOI
- 1978, Organizational behavior and human performance, 21, 40, 10.1016/0030-5073(78)90037-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 1996, LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 7, 1, 10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90032-6 · DOI
- 1990, Administrative science quarterly, 35, 317, 10.2307/2393393 · DOI · Paper page
- 1998, PUBLIC PRODUCTIVITY MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 21, 230, 10.2307/3380856 · DOI
- 2000, Public administration review, 60, 535, 10.1111/0033-3352.00116 · DOI
- 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 24, 679
- 2005, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 52, 59, 10.1109/TEM.2004.839955 · DOI
- 2005, AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 35, 122, 10.1177/0275074004272622 · DOI
- Lonti, 2003, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 283, 10.1093/jopart/mug025 · DOI
- 1997, The Rand journal of economics, 28, 447, 10.2307/2556024 · DOI
- 1960, American sociological review, 25, 704, 10.2307/2090143 · DOI
- 1988, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 31, 897, 10.2307/256344 · DOI
- 2000, PUBLIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 24, 177, 10.2307/3381267 · DOI
- Moon, 2002, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12, 273, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003532 · DOI
- Moon, 2001, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 327, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003505 · DOI
- 2005, INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 15, 43, 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00185.x · DOI · Paper page
- 2000, HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 10, 313, 10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00043-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 2000, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 37, 427, 10.1111/1467-6486.00187 · DOI
- 2000, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 37, 77
- 1974, 1, 23, 10.1086/208587 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, Public administration review, 65, 713, 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00500.x · DOI
- 2005, PUBLIC MONEY MANAGEMENT, 25, 89, 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00458.x · DOI
- 1985, KNOWLEDGE CREATION DIFFUSION UTILIZATION, 6, 261
- 1996, JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH THEORY, 6, 5, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024303 · DOI
- 1988, Academy of management review. Academy of Management, 13, 182, 10.5465/amr.1988.4306858 · DOI · Paper page
- 2006, 84, 1051, 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00626.x · DOI
- Priem, 1999, Journal of Management, 25, 935, 10.1177/014920639902500607 · DOI · Paper page
- 2000, PUBLIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 24, 121, 10.2307/3381263 · DOI
- Roberts, 2003, Organization Science, 14, 107, 10.1287/orsc.14.2.107.14990 · DOI · Paper page
- Sabet, 1993, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 252
- 2004, Public administration review, 64, 141, 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00356.x · DOI
- 2007, PUBLIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 30, 590
- 1994, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 37, 580, 10.2307/256701 · DOI · Paper page
- 1981, 18, 291, 10.1177/002224378101800303 · DOI · Paper page
- 2001, JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 39, 165, 10.1111/1540-627X.00015 · DOI
- 2002, JOURNAL OF LEADERSHIP STUDIES, 8, 88, 10.1177/107179190200800408 · DOI
- 1981, Public administration review, 41, 507, 10.2307/976260 · DOI
- 2001, Public administration review, 61, 515, 10.1111/0033-3352.00124 · DOI
- 1996, OMEGA, 24, 631, 10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00031-X · DOI · Paper page
- 1990, 27, 70, 10.1177/002224379002700107 · DOI
- 1994, Public administration review, 54, 331, 10.2307/977380 · DOI
- 1995, OMEGA, 23, 429, 10.1016/0305-0483(95)00017-I · DOI · Paper page
- 1982, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 29, 28
- VAN DE VEN, 1988, Communication Research, 15, 632, 10.1177/009365088015005007 · DOI
- 2008, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 591, 10.1093/jopart/mum026 · DOI · Paper page
- 2006, 84, 311, 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00004.x · DOI
- 2006, JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT, 25, 371, 10.1002/pam.20177 · DOI
- Walker, 2004, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 417, 10.1093/jopart/muh022 · DOI
- 1996, The Journal of applied psychology, 81, 680, 10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.680 · DOI · Paper page
- 1999, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 46, 311
- 1999, PUBLIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 23, 150
- 1994, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 31, 405, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00624.x · DOI · Paper page
- 2001, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 22, 935, 10.1002/smj.194 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA
DE VRIES, H., BEKKERS, V., & TUMMERS, L. (2016) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12209 · Cited by 1,214
Innovation Adoption: A Review of Theories and Constructs
Wisdom, J. P., Chor, K. H. B., Hoagwood, K. E., & Horwitz, S. M. (2014) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0486-4 · Cited by 451
A conceptual model for the process of IT innovation adoption in organizations
Hameed, M. A., Counsell, S., & Swift, S. (2012) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.007 · Cited by 442
Exploring artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations: a comparative case study
Neumann, O., Guirguis, K., & Steiner, R. (2024) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2048685 · Cited by 451
“…the adopting organization, such as the introduction and use of a technology, product, process, or practice (Hameed, Counsell, and Swift 2012, 359; Damanpour and Schneider 2009) and that involves productively ‘using computer hardware and software applications to support operations, management,…”
MethodRoman, A. V. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.014 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-11-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 495-522
- ISSN
- 1053-1858 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9803
- OpenAlex
- W1984297968
- Cited by
- 931
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 44.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.