The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Network Governance of Crisis Response: Case Studies of Incident Command Systems
Open accessAbstract
This article examines the application of a structural innovation known as Incident Command Systems (ICS) in different crises. The ICS seeks to coordinate multiple response organizations under a temporary hierarchical structure. The ICS is of practical interest because it has become the dominant mechanism by which crisis response is organized in the United States. It is of theoretical interest because it provides insights into how a highly centralized mode of network governance operates. Despite the hierarchical characteristics of the ICS, the network properties of crisis response fundamentally affects its operations, in terms of the coordination difficulties that multiple members bring, the ways in which authority is shared and contested between members, and the importance of trust in supplementing formal modes of control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,802
Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · Cited by 16,670
Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed)
Morse, J. M. (1996) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(96)00056-6 · Cited by 5,593
Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2007) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015 · Cited by 4,006
Siggelkow, N. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160882 · Cited by 3,472
An integrative model of organizational trust: past, present, and future
Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24348410 · Cited by 2,794
TAKING STOCK OF NETWORKS AND ORGANIZATIONS: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE.
Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., & Greve, H. R. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159624 · Cited by 2,502
Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393698 · Cited by 1,903
Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206307302554 · Cited by 1,743
Cited by
Managing Transboundary Crises: Identifying the Building Blocks of an Effective Response System
Ansell, C., Boin, A., & Keller, A. (2010) · Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00620.x · Cited by 664
Designing Public Participation Processes
Bryson, J. M., Quick, K. S., Slotterback, C. S., & Crosby, B. C. (2013) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x · Cited by 626
Organizing for Crisis Management: Building Governance Capacity and Legitimacy
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2016) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12558 · Cited by 507
BOIN, A., & LODGE, M. (2016) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12264 · Cited by 390
Performance measurement systems in public service networks. The what, who, and how of control
Agostino, D., & Arnaboldi, M. (2018) · Financial Accountability & Management · doi:10.1111/faam.12147 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Moynihan, D. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-01-30
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 895-915
- ISSN
- 1053-1858 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9803
- OpenAlex
- W3125425522
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 34.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Network Governance of Crisis Response: Case Studies of Incident Command Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jopart/mun033
- The paper
- Moynihan, D. P. (2009). The Network Governance of Crisis Response: Case Studies of Incident Command Systems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
