Cited by 2,794Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltySocial Power and Status Dynamics

An integrative model of organizational trust: past, present, and future

Schoorman, F. David, Mayer, Roger C., Davis, James H.·2007·Academy of Management Review

Abstract

A considerable amount of research has examined trust since our 1995 publication. We revisit some of the critical issues that we addressed and provide clarifications and extensions of the topics of levels of analysis, time, control systems, reciprocity, and measurement. We also recognize recent research in new areas of trust, such as affect, emotion, violation and repair, distrust, international and cross-cultural issues, and context-specific models, and we identify promising avenues for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amr.2007.24348410

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Akron (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Review
Published
2007-04
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
344-354
ISSN
  • 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-3807
OpenAlex
W2148215741
Cited by
2,794
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 154 · 2024: 163 · 2023: 172 · 2022: 191 · 2021: 192 · 2020: 177 · 2019: 157 · 2018: 157 · 2017: 184 · 2016: 158 · 2015: 167 · 2014: 176 · 2013: 141 · 2012: 123
FWCI
141.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
organizational trust, levels of analysis, time, control systems, reciprocity, trust measurement, affect and emotion, distrust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review