The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coping During Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature
Abstract
Frontline workers, such as teachers and social workers, often experience stress when delivering public services to clients, for instance because of high workloads. They adapt by coping, using such practices as breaking or bending rules for clients, or rationing services. Although coping is recognized as an important response to the problems of frontline work, the public administration field lacks a comprehensive view of coping. The first contribution of this article is therefore theoretical: conceptualizing coping during public service delivery and developing a coherent classification of coping. This is done via a systematic review of the literature from 1981 to 2014. The second contribution is empirical: via a systematic review of the literature from 1981–2014 this article provides a framework and analytical account of how coping during public service delivery has been studied since 1980. It highlights the importance of the type of profession (such as being a teacher or a police officer), the amount of workload, and the degree of discretion for understanding how frontline workers cope with stress. It also reveals that frontline workers often draw on the coping family “moving towards clients” revealing a strong tendency to provide meaningful public service to clients, even under stressful conditions. We conclude with an agenda for future studies, examining new theoretical, methodological and empirical opportunities to advance understanding of coping during public service delivery. Trabalhadores de linha de frente, tais como professores e assistentes sociais, frequentemente experimentam estresse no exercício de suas funções de entrega de serviços públicos para os clientes em função do acúmulo de trabalho. Eles se adaptam ao enfrentamento utilizando práticas tais como quebrar ou contornar regras para os clientes, ou racionamento de serviços. Apesar do enfrentamento ser reconhecido como uma importante resposta aos problemas de linha de frente, a administração pública se ressente de uma visão totalizadora do mesmo. A primeira contribuição do artigo é, desta forma, teórica: conceituando o enfrentamento durante a prestação de serviços públicos e o desenvolvimento de uma classificação coerente de enfrentamento. Isto é realizado via revisão sistemática da literatura de 1981 a 2014. A segunda contribuição é empírica: através de uma revisão sistemática da literatura de 1981-2014, o artigo apresenta um quadro e uma narrativa analítica de como o enfrentamento durante a prestação de serviços públicos tem sido estudada desde 1980. O texto realça a importância dos tipos de profissão (tal como ser um professor ou um agente policial), a quantidade de carga de trabalho e o grau de discernimento para o entendimento de como trabalhadores de linha de frente lidam com o estresse. Ele também revela que trabalhadores de linha de frente frequentemente recorrem à famílias de “clientes proativos” revelando uma forte tendência a entregar serviços públicos significativos para os clientes mesmo que em condições de estresse. Nós concluímos com uma agenda para estudos futuros, examinando novas teorias, métodos e oportunidades empíricas para avançar o entendimento do enfrentamento durante prestação de serviços públicos. Translated by Ricardo Gomes, University of Brasília
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Street‐level bureaucrats and other state actors are often motivated to help disadvantaged citizens compensate for their challenges in life (Jilke and Tummers 2018; Tummers et al. 2015).”
From Human Capital and Administrative Burden: The Role of Cognitive Resources in Citizen‐State Interactions (2020) · cites this paper as Tummers et al. 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · Cited by 28,164
(1991) · Cited by 15,554
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136 · Cited by 10,349
Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
Lipsky, M. (1981) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1288305 · Cited by 8,981
Psychological stress and the coping process
Lazarus, R. S. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,164
An Analysis of Coping in a Middle-Aged Community Sample
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136617 · Cited by 6,361
Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216 · Cited by 2,639
What is Wrong with Social Theory?
Blumer, H. (1954) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088165 · Cited by 2,535
Positive affect and the other side of coping.
Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.6.647 · Cited by 2,471
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- *References included in the systematic review and cited in this article. Note that not all publications included in our review have been cited.
- Breuer, 1955, Studies on hysteria (Standard Edition), 2
- Gilliom, 2001, Overseers of the poor: Resistance, surveillance, and the limits of privacy
- Loyens, 2014, Coping with policy alienation in law enforcement
- 10.2307/800205 · DOI
- Monahan, 2010, Introduction, 1
- * Winter S. Baviskar Siddhartha . 2010. Street-level bureaucracy and performance: A cross-policy analysis. SFI Advisory Research Board Conference 2010 & 2010 Midwest Political Science Association Conference. SFI - The Danish National Research Centre for Social Policy. April 2010.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 752
Liu, L., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/00953997231187082 · Cited by 13
“While there is a large body of literature on the coping strategies of SLBs, most studies concentrate on how SLBs use discretion to bend and break rules, routinize service delivery, or ration existing resources (Tummers et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMadsen, J. K. (2024) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/00953997241244694 · Cited by 11
“Rule-bending thus becomes a way of proactively coping with rules that stand in the way of addressing clients’ needs (DeHart-Davis, 2007; Tummers et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAviram, N. F., Lotta, G., & de Carvalho, L. J. (2024) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13824 · Cited by 12
The Interactive Effect of Extrinsic Controls and Public Service Motivation on Blame Avoidance
Tu, W. (2024) · Public Personnel Management · doi:10.1177/00910260241283549 · Cited by 10
“They suggest that instead of being passively subjected to their superiors’ punishment, bureaucrats seem quite resistant to sanction and may manipulate controls and distort responsibilities to alleviate the risks of being blamed (De Bruijn, 2002; Tummers et al., 2015).”
Making a familial care worker: the gendered exclusion of asylum-seeking women in Denmark
Kohl, K. S. (2020) · Gender Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/0966369x.2020.1786018 · Cited by 10
“…is that their budgets and the organization of their services make it impossible to achieve the ideal of responding to clients’ individual needs and characteristics, leaving street-level bureaucrats to cope with the difficulties and ambiguities of their job (Lipsky 2010, 82; Tummers et al. 2015).”
BackgroundPrusty, S. K., & Mahapatra, D. (2021) · Journal of Public Affairs · doi:10.1002/pa.2633 · Cited by 10
“Therefore, quality and effectiveness of public services would eventually hinge on the productive behaviour of SLBs (Tummers et al., 2015).”
BackgroundRauhaus, B. M. (2022) · State and Local Government Review · doi:10.1177/0160323x221079242 · Cited by 10
“…street-level bureaucrats are groups of public servants that interact directly with the public and have a formal task to enhance the welfare of society while also meeting the demands and priorities of the specific communities they serve (Lipsky 1980; Tummers et al. 2015; Cohen and Hertz 2020).”
BackgroundAccountability in personalised Supported Employment-based activation services
Skjold, S. M., & Lundberg, K. G. (2022) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279422000915 · Cited by 10
“…workers decide to focus on a proportion of their clients), creaming (selecting clients with performance targets that are easy to realise), rule bending, and rule breaking (Tummers et al ., 2015; Van Berkel Knies, 2016; Freier and Senghaas, 2021; Gjersøe and Strand, 2021; Raspanti and Saruis, 2021).”
Mapping out the motivational basis of active representation as intergroup behavior
Kang, I., & Jilke, S. (2022) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12908 · Cited by 10
Levitats, Z. (2023) · Review of Public Personnel Administration · doi:10.1177/0734371x221149165 · Cited by 11
“Instead, they are expected to simultaneously handle administrative and client-related concerns (Jensen & Pedersen, 2017; Tummers et al., 2015) to ensure personalized and fully appropriate responses to individual clients and their situations (Lipsky, 1980/2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialAlcadipani, R., Lotta, G., & Cohen, N. (2023) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13670 · Cited by 10
Good Governance as An Economic Driver for Service Delivery: Lessons for South African Government
Marawu, N. M., Utete, R., & Zhou, S. (2023) · International Journal of Management Entrepreneurship Social Sciences and Humanities · doi:10.31098/ijmesh.v6i2.1219 · Cited by 10
Evaluation of the non-take-up of public services and social benefits
Daigneault, P. (2023) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781800884892.00036 · Cited by 10
Nielsen, V. L., & Nielsen, H. Ø. (2024) · International Journal of Social Welfare · doi:10.1111/ijsw.12663 · Cited by 15
Discrimination based on political beliefs: A field experiment on the freedom of assembly
Adam, C., Grohs, S., & Knill, C. (2020) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/0952076720905012 · Cited by 10
“As such, they try to serve prominent demands from local communities well and try to minimize stress and thus conflict in their daily work (Tummers et al., 2015).”
BackgroundAdministrative Justice in Street-Level Decision-Making
Raaphorst, N. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190903084.013.19 · Cited by 10
A formal model of street-level bureaucracy
Chang, A. (2021) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/10434631211043205 · Cited by 10
“Research in streetlevel bureaucrats’ behavior has developed in several different ways; some scholars describe the behavioral patterns of these bureaucrats by relying on the term “coping behavior” (e.g. Kelly, 1994; Tummers et al., 2015), while others emphasize the street-level bureaucrats’ behavioral divergence in pra…”
BackgroundSidha, Z. O., Asingo, P. O., & Magutu, J. (2020) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/polp.12386 · Cited by 9
Hendrikx, W., Kuiper, M., & van Gestel, N. (2022) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/09520767221094446 · Cited by 12
“Second, most literature studying motivations and skills of public professionals focuses on reforms that are managerial in nature, and not collaborative (e.g. Tummers et al., 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialQin, X., Zhang, S., & Dou, K. (2024) · Review of Public Personnel Administration · doi:10.1177/0734371x241289943 · Cited by 12
“Under stress related to their work, some employees help citizens using personal resources, while others show aggression (Tummers et al., 2015).”
InfluentialFriedrich, L. (2025) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.70052 · Cited by 9
Koerner, A., & Johnston, J. M. (2021) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muab047 · Cited by 10
Ciornei, I., Euchner, E., Preisner, M., & Yesil, I. (2022) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12500 · Cited by 12
Rule bending on the frontlines of public service delivery: How and why caseworkers favor the strong
Hansen, P. (2022) · International Public Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10967494.2022.2138660 · Cited by 10
“…” research is full of examples of how police officers, teachers, caseworkers, and others occasionally bend or even break the rules to accommodate clients (Einstein and Glick 2017; Keiser, Mueser, and Choi 2004; Lipsky 2010; Maynard-Moody and Musheno 2003; Schram et al. 2009; Tummers et al. 2015).”
Munobwa, J. S., Öberg, P., & Ahmadi, F. (2023) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci12020058 · Cited by 22
Response, awareness and requester identity in FOI law: Evidence from a field experiment
Cicatiello, L., Simone, E. D., Mascio, F. D., Gaeta, G. L., Natalini, A., & Worthy, B. (2024) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2024.02.010 · Cited by 9
Rauf, M. A., McCordic, C. R., & Frayne, B. (2024) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-024-04720-4 · Cited by 9
“Furthermore, in the case of incapaci - tated policy accumulation, new policy directives may result in a negative tradeoff with the existing practices (Tummers et al., 2015).”
Benoit, M., & Marier, P. (2024) · International Journal of Social Welfare · doi:10.1111/ijsw.12664 · Cited by 9
Pihl‐Thingvad, S., Hansen, S. W., Winter, V., Hansen, M. S., & Willems, J. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039027 · Cited by 9
Administrative Groupings and Equality in Public Service Provision
Junge, S. Y. (2021) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muab031 · Cited by 9
“I’m paid to do other things”: Complementary co-production tasks for professionals
McMullin, C. (2022) · Local Government Studies · doi:10.1080/03003930.2022.2077728 · Cited by 9
“Coping with these tensions was therefore done by rule bending and instrumental action (Tummers et al. 2015).”
BackgroundHansen, L. S. (2020) · Time & Society · doi:10.1177/0961463x20950983 · Cited by 9
“Rather, it is often a way of coping with either performance measures, large caseloads, or troublesome citizens (Tummers et al., 2015).”
BackgroundWang, Y., & Pan, H. X. (2024) · Journal of Asian Public Policy · doi:10.1080/17516234.2023.2301121 · Cited by 8
“This gives them a higher level of tolerance of the enforced (Oberfield, 2010; Tummers et al., 2015).”
Raaphorst, N., Ashikali, T., & Groeneveld, S. M. (2024) · Social Policy and Administration · doi:10.1111/spol.13033 · Cited by 11
Lofaro, R. J., & Sapat, A. K. (2024) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muae015 · Cited by 8
Senghaas, M., Röhrer, S., Köppen, M., et al. (2024) · Zeitschrift für Sozialreform · doi:10.1515/zsr-2024-0013 · Cited by 8
Shi, G., & Wang, G. (2025) · Chinese Political Science Review · doi:10.1007/s41111-025-00277-3 · Cited by 8
“…street-level bureaucrats usually have three forms of coping tendencies in policy implementation: utilizing personal resources to meet the public’s needs; implementing according to the policy regulations; and adding new administrative barriers to existing regulations (Tummers et al. 2015).”
Daigneault, P., Ouimet, M., Fortier-Chouinard, A., Tadida, E. Z. N., & Baby-Bouchard, A. (2025) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.70005 · Cited by 9
Mikkelsen, M. F., Pedersen, M. J., & Petersen, N. B. G. (2022) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muac020 · Cited by 11
Hummell, E., Foster, M. M., Fisher, K. R., Needham, C. E., Borg, S. J., & Venning, A. (2022) · International Journal of Care and Caring · doi:10.1332/239788221x16504513780378 · Cited by 8
van der Meer, J., Vermeeren, B., & Steijn, B. (2023) · Urban Affairs Review · doi:10.1177/10780874231203892 · Cited by 8
“Tummers et al. (2015) identi fi ed three distinct families of coping: moving towards clients, moving away from clients, and moving against clients.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGershgoren, S., & Cohen, N. (2023) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2023.2268088 · Cited by 8
“…1993; Wright and Barker 2000) and career members may cope with such stress (Davidovitz and Cohen 2022; Schott, Van Kleef, and Noordegraaf 2016; Tummers et al. 2015) by adopting their lay collaborators’ opinions even if they do not fully agree with them (Keulemans and Van de Walle 2020;…”
Does organizational change trigger civil servant proactivity? The impact of past changes experienced
Verlinden, S., Bach, T., Wynen, J., Kleizen, B., & Verhoest, K. (2023) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2023.2284225 · Cited by 8
“For instance, the high motivation of public employees to contribute to society despite difficult working conditions has been demonstrated in multiple studies of street level bureaucrats’ coping behaviour (Tummers et al. 2015).”
Barsky, C. S. (2024) · Public Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/07349149241231109 · Cited by 8
“Reviewing the public service delivery literature, Tummers et al. (2015) conclude that front-line workers are driven by public service motivation (PSM) to perform job tasks that require interaction with citizen-clients in stressful situations.”
BackgroundLenz, A., Steinebach, Y., & Casula, M. (2024) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12606 · Cited by 11
Edri-Peer, O., & Cohen, N. (2024) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2024.2399145 · Cited by 7
Savi, R., & Cepilovs, A. (2016) · Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1126946 · Cited by 8
“At the street level, solving unpredicted situations and making ad hoc decisions when confronted with diverse demands and restricted resources commonly manifests in specific coping mechanisms that enable bureaucrats to manage workloads (Lipsky 1980; Tummers et al. 2015).”
BackgroundNav-veilederes dilemmaer i oppfølgingen av personer med psykiske helseproblemer
Bråthen, M. (2020) · Søkelys på arbeidslivet · doi:10.18261/issn.1504-7989-2020-01-02-04 · Cited by 8
Cardillo, V. H., Gemma, S. F. B., & Fuentes-Rojas, M. (2021) · Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional · doi:10.1590/2317-6369000004819 · Cited by 8
Drenth, A., & van Steden, R. (2020) · Journal of Crime and Justice · doi:10.1080/0735648x.2020.1722202 · Cited by 12
“However, patrol o ffi cers do not always ‘ move towards ’ civilians (Tummers et al. 2015).”
BackgroundStreet-Level Bureaucrats in Public Policy
Cohen, N. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-90434-0_40-1 · Cited by 8
de Boer, N., Schott, C., & Loyens, K. M. (2024) · Review of Public Personnel Administration · doi:10.1177/0734371x241227899 · Cited by 7
“A dominant focus in the street-level bureaucracy literature is on what stressors street-level bureau-crats must cope with while implementing policies (e.g., Schott et al., 2016; L. L. Tummers et al., 2015).”
Enablers or deterrent? Role of street level managers in use of creativity at the frontlines
Bashir, M., & Masood, A. (2024) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.12866 · Cited by 7
Administrative Burden Revisited: Advancing Research and Practice
Daigneault, P. (2025) · Canadian Public Administration · doi:10.1111/capa.70000 · Cited by 7
An, C., Yu, J., & Tan, X. (2025) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2025.2501734 · Cited by 7
“While prior research has examined structural dimensions of discretion (e.g. Destler 2017; Hinterleitner and Wittwer 2023; Tummers et al. 2015), only recent studies have explored PSM’s effects on preferences regarding policy instruments (Song et al. 2017), prosocial rule-breaking (Weißmüller, De…”
InfluentialLandini, I. (2025) · Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy · doi:10.1017/ics.2025.10055 · Cited by 7
“Unlike other studies (Lipsky, 1980; Maynard-Moody and Musheno, 2023; Riccucci, 2005; Tummers et al., 2015; Gofen et al., 2019), however, teachers ’ individual characteristics do not clearly emerge as decisive contextual elements behind discretionary mechanisms – at least not for the teachers…”
InfluentialFerraro, V., Lotta, G., & Honchar, M. (2025) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muaf035 · Cited by 7
Edri‐Peer, O., & Cohen, N. (2026) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2026.2620549 · Cited by 10
Nørup, I., & Jacobsen, B. (2021) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12820 · Cited by 7
Nichele, E., Lavorgna, A., & Middleton, S. E. (2022) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-022-00532-3 · Cited by 7
“…of interactions they come across (which entail, for instance, reduced emotional proximity and the absence of non-verbal cues, see Bambling et al. 2008), their broader administrative tasks (Tummers et al. 2015; Breit et al. 2021), and risks of vicarious traumatisation (Furlonger and Taylor 2013).”
BackgroundXiao, M., Liu, N., Lo, C. W., et al. (2023) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2023.2282002 · Cited by 7
“Sanctions and punishments are most often used by street-level bureaucrats such as the police, who are responsible for law enforcement (Tummers et al., 2015).”
InfluentialBeyond administrative burden: Activation and administrative harm
McGann, M. T., & Ball, S. (2024) · Australian Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1002/ajs4.371 · Cited by 7
Mussagulova, A. (2025) · Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/23276665.2025.2455958 · Cited by 8
“In the best of times, public service can be stressful and employees often battle high workloads (Nguyen & Tuan, 2022; Tummers et al., 2015) and emotional burdens (Guy & Newman, 2004; Henderson & Borry, 2023).”
Resultatbaseret statsstyring af lokal kernevelfærd
Møller, M. Ø., & Andersen, V. N. (2017) · Politik · doi:10.7146/politik.v20i2.27653 · Cited by 7
Public Servants at the Regulatory Front Lines. Street-Level Enforcement in Theory and Practice
de Winter, P., & Hertogh, M. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_4-1 · Cited by 7
Examining the Validity of Traffic Stop Data: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Police Officer Compliance
Chanin, J., & Welsh, M. (2020) · Police Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1098611120933644 · Cited by 12
“There is a robust, multidisciplinary literature that examines how and why bureaucrats respond to rules designed to shape or alter behavior in accordance with non-mission-based values like transparency and lawfulness (e.g., Brehm & Gates, 1999; Martin et al., 2013; Tummers et al., 2015).”
BackgroundBaker, A. C., Hillier, A. E., & Perry, M. (2020) · Journal of Policy Practice and Research · doi:10.1007/s42972-020-00010-1 · Cited by 7
Crowdfunding in Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review
Lenart-Gansiniec, R. A. (2021) · Contributions to finance and accounting · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77841-5_2 · Cited by 7
Colaux, É., Schiffino, N., & Moyson, S. (2023) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/00953997231157748 · Cited by 7
“…of coping mechanisms have been distinguished by SLB research, such as routinizing some tasks, i.e., providing identical services to all citizens (Tummers et al., 2015); rationing some services, for example, by reducing the effort allocated to face-to-face interactions as well as the duration of…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPihl‐Thingvad, S. (2016) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2016.1177556 · Cited by 7
“86) and about the expected and dysfunctional effects of PM, especially in relation to street-level bureaucrats’ perceptions of and behavior in their work (Dias & Maynard-Moody, 2007; Heinrich & Marschke, 2010; Soss et al., 2011; Tummers et al., 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialCoping with representation: the moderating effect of workload on individual-level representation
McCrea, A. M. (2022) · International Public Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10967494.2022.2078913 · Cited by 7
“…on bureaucratic coping provides a useful theoretical lens for studies of representation since it explores the behavioral mechanisms which bureaucrats employ to manage, tolerate, or control their demand and job uncertainty (Dubois 2010; Folkman and Lazarus 1988; Lipsky 1980; Tummers et al. 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialDoes appealability foster more citizen‐friendly decisions at the street level?
Gershgoren, S., & Cohen, N. (2022) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12503 · Cited by 9
The Decision Made: On the Inspection Encounter
Hupe, P. L. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04058-1_12 · Cited by 7
Tao, L., Liu, N., & Wen, B. (2024) · Review of Public Personnel Administration · doi:10.1177/0734371x241304024 · Cited by 6
“Although these three types of coping seem equally important, most scholarly attention has been paid to research on moving toward and away from client strategies (Tummers et al., 2015).”
InfluentialAdaptive Capacity in a Crisis: Turbulence Managers in Street‐Level Organizations
Alirani, G., Oscarsson, O., Olausson, P. M., et al. (2025) · Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management · doi:10.1111/1468-5973.70017 · Cited by 6
“Street ‐ level bureaucrats often cope with complex situations under stress when providing welfare services to clients (Lipsky 1980; Tummers et al. 2015).”
Schmidt, E., Bernards, B., & van der Pas, S. (2025) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muaf010 · Cited by 6
“In practice, however, frontline professionals do not give all clients equal time, energy, and resources (Lipsky 1980; Tummers et al. 2015).”
Ferencz, S., Greer, A., & Butler, A. (2025) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.70007 · Cited by 6
Liu, Y., Kim, J., & Nabatchi, T. (2025) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.70031 · Cited by 6
“This aligns with the concept of “performance coping,” where agents prioritize visible and achievable goals to demonstrate effectiveness (Tummers et al. 2015; Tummers 2017).”
Witkowski, K. G. K. (2023) · Public Personnel Management · doi:10.1177/00910260231171055 · Cited by 6
“These coping mechanisms can include prioritizing which clients they serve, minimizing contact with the public, or even rigid rule-following (McCrea, 2022; Tummers, 2017; Tummers et al., 2015).”
BackgroundWhen do bureaucrats choose to unburden clients: A randomized experiment
Johnson, D., & Neshkova, M. I. (2023) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12972 · Cited by 7
Yu, S. (2024) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/00953997241268163 · Cited by 8
“…and resources necessary to respond to all individual cases properly, SLBs may develop various coping strategies to address their heavy workload and stress and to balance various policy requirements and goals (Chang & Brewer, 2023; Hupe et al., 2015; May & Winter, 2009; Tummers et al., 2015).”
Lofaro, R. J., & Sapat, A. K. (2024) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/02750740241275715 · Cited by 6
“…at implementation, during which street-level bureaucrats and their supervisors interact with and make decisions about clients based on client characteristics and the social origins, values, and lived experiences of the bureaucrat (Maynard-Moody et al., 2003; Tummers et al., 2015; Zamboni, 2020).”
Complexity meets flexibility: unintended differentiation in EU public procurement
Loxbo, K., & Pircher, B. (2024) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501763.2024.2427196 · Cited by 6
“This burden can force implementers to make critical decisions about which rules to enforce and which to neglect (Limberg et al., 2021; Tummers et al., 2015) – a phenomenon known as ‘policy triage’ (Knill et al., 2023).”
Client credibility judgment: A source of inequity in street‐level implementation
Kang, I., & Lee, S. (2024) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12580 · Cited by 7
“When SLBs find a client credible, they tend to serve as citizen-agents , using their discretion on behalf of the client, but when SLBs do not find a client credible, they act more as state-agents , and may even end up working against clients (Maynard-Moody & Musheno, 2000; Tummers et al., 2015).”
Automatically Prepared? How Frontline Workers Cope in the Face of Automation
Jørring, L. (2024) · Social Policy and Administration · doi:10.1111/spol.13105 · Cited by 6
Hansen, P., Pedersen, M. J., & Willems, J. (2024) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13904 · Cited by 7
“” This sentiment concerning a violation of social equity is echoed widely in the literature (see, e.g., Guul et al., 2021; Hansen, 2023; Keiser, 1999; Koven, 2019; Lipsky, 1980; Lowi, 1969; Tummers et al., 2015).”
InfluentialProfessionalism and Public Craftsmanship at Street Level
Paanakker, H. L. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21522-4_8 · Cited by 6
‘Social Citizenship’ at the Street Level? EU Member State Administrations Setting a Firewall
Heindlmaier, A. (2020) · JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/jcms.13028 · Cited by 6
“…task to grant rights to certain persons and may try to meet the demands of their clients, but they nevertheless have to meet their internal demands (Tummers et al., 2015): they have an incentive to keep, first, the administrative costs, and second, the financial costs low (Feldman, 2003, p. 281).”
Different encounter behaviors: Businesses in encounters with regulatory agencies
Nielsen, H. Ø., & Nielsen, V. L. (2022) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12455 · Cited by 6
Children, COVID, and confusion: How frontline workers cope with the challenges of vaccine mandates
Harvey, J., & Attwell, K. (2022) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12567 · Cited by 6
Fagprofessionelles klassifikation af kerneopgaver og komplementære opgaver
Thomsen, M. K., & Jensen, U. T. (2018) · Politica · doi:10.7146/politica.v50i3.131190 · Cited by 6
Heirwegh, T., & de Graaf, C. V. (2019) · The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law · doi:10.1080/07329113.2019.1639309 · Cited by 6
“Here, the coping mechanism is one where the street-level bureaucrat is moving towards the client by temporarily breaking the rules to adjust the rules to the client’s demand (Evans 2013; Tummers et al. 2015).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialvan Steden, R. (2020) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101532 · Cited by 7
Coping With Threats and Harassment in Politics
Marijnissen, D., Kolthoff, E. W., & Huberts, L. W. J. C. (2020) · Public Integrity · doi:10.1080/10999922.2020.1714410 · Cited by 6
Sunyehzi, D. D. K. (2021) · Public Organization Review · doi:10.1007/s11115-021-00520-w · Cited by 6
Paanakker, H. L., Masters, A. B., & Huberts, L. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21522-4 · Cited by 6
Hefetz, A. (2016) · Local Government Studies · doi:10.1080/03003930.2016.1181060 · Cited by 6
“The public domain is a complete system of users’ rights and liabilities, a system that dynamically shares public resources based on individuals’ equity and voice (Tummers et al. 2015; Bartels 2013; Fainstein 2005).”
BackgroundAssessing the effect of digitalisation on a public “self-servicing” service
Garlatti, A., Iacuzzi, S., Pauluzzo, R., & Pericolo, E. (2025) · Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management · doi:10.1108/jpbafm-09-2024-0186 · Cited by 10
Equity and equality in street-level public service delivery
Raaphorst, N., Lotta, G., Lavee, E., Espinoza, I., Thomann, E., Eckhard, S., Masood, A., Dissanayake, V., Headley, A. M., & Pedersen, M. J. (2025) · Perspectives on Public Management and Governance · doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvaf019 · Cited by 5
Choi, H., Park, S., & Lee, S. (2025) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2025.2559852 · Cited by 5
“…in street-level bureaucracy (e.g. Hupe and Hill 2007; Maynard-Moody and Craig Musheno 2003) and existing review work on implementation studies (e.g. L. L. G. Tummers et al. 2015), we identified two main topics as predefined coding themes: determinants of discretion, and consequences of discretion.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Tummers, L. L. G., Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
- University of California System (US)
- ORCID
- Musheno, Michael
- Venue
- Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-01-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1099-1126
- ISSN
- 1053-1858 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9803
- OpenAlex
- W1998134118
- Cited by
- 756
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 118 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 10
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Georgia
- University of Washington
- University of Kansas
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- European Commission (329519)
- Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
- Universiteit Utrecht
- Université de Lausanne
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- coping, public service delivery, frontline workers, occupational stress, workload, discretion, teachers, social workers, police officers, rule violations, public administration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review