The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coping During Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature
Abstract
Frontline workers, such as teachers and social workers, often experience stress when delivering public services to clients, for instance because of high workloads. They adapt by coping, using such practices as breaking or bending rules for clients, or rationing services. Although coping is recognized as an important response to the problems of frontline work, the public administration field lacks a comprehensive view of coping. The first contribution of this article is therefore theoretical: conceptualizing coping during public service delivery and developing a coherent classification of coping. This is done via a systematic review of the literature from 1981 to 2014. The second contribution is empirical: via a systematic review of the literature from 1981–2014 this article provides a framework and analytical account of how coping during public service delivery has been studied since 1980. It highlights the importance of the type of profession (such as being a teacher or a police officer), the amount of workload, and the degree of discretion for understanding how frontline workers cope with stress. It also reveals that frontline workers often draw on the coping family “moving towards clients” revealing a strong tendency to provide meaningful public service to clients, even under stressful conditions. We conclude with an agenda for future studies, examining new theoretical, methodological and empirical opportunities to advance understanding of coping during public service delivery. Trabalhadores de linha de frente, tais como professores e assistentes sociais, frequentemente experimentam estresse no exercício de suas funções de entrega de serviços públicos para os clientes em função do acúmulo de trabalho. Eles se adaptam ao enfrentamento utilizando práticas tais como quebrar ou contornar regras para os clientes, ou racionamento de serviços. Apesar do enfrentamento ser reconhecido como uma importante resposta aos problemas de linha de frente, a administração pública se ressente de uma visão totalizadora do mesmo. A primeira contribuição do artigo é, desta forma, teórica: conceituando o enfrentamento durante a prestação de serviços públicos e o desenvolvimento de uma classificação coerente de enfrentamento. Isto é realizado via revisão sistemática da literatura de 1981 a 2014. A segunda contribuição é empírica: através de uma revisão sistemática da literatura de 1981-2014, o artigo apresenta um quadro e uma narrativa analítica de como o enfrentamento durante a prestação de serviços públicos tem sido estudada desde 1980. O texto realça a importância dos tipos de profissão (tal como ser um professor ou um agente policial), a quantidade de carga de trabalho e o grau de discernimento para o entendimento de como trabalhadores de linha de frente lidam com o estresse. Ele também revela que trabalhadores de linha de frente frequentemente recorrem à famílias de “clientes proativos” revelando uma forte tendência a entregar serviços públicos significativos para os clientes mesmo que em condições de estresse. Nós concluímos com uma agenda para estudos futuros, examinando novas teorias, métodos e oportunidades empíricas para avançar o entendimento do enfrentamento durante prestação de serviços públicos. Translated by Ricardo Gomes, University of Brasília
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Street‐level bureaucrats and other state actors are often motivated to help disadvantaged citizens compensate for their challenges in life (Jilke and Tummers 2018; Tummers et al. 2015).”
From Human Capital and Administrative Burden: The Role of Cognitive Resources in Citizen‐State Interactions (2020) · cites this paper as Tummers et al. 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · Cited by 28,164
(1991) · Cited by 15,554
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136 · Cited by 10,349
Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
Lipsky, M. (1981) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1288305 · Cited by 8,981
Psychological stress and the coping process
Lazarus, R. S. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,164
An Analysis of Coping in a Middle-Aged Community Sample
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136617 · Cited by 6,361
Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216 · Cited by 2,639
What is Wrong with Social Theory?
Blumer, H. (1954) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088165 · Cited by 2,535
Positive affect and the other side of coping.
Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.6.647 · Cited by 2,471
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- *References included in the systematic review and cited in this article. Note that not all publications included in our review have been cited.
- Breuer, 1955, Studies on hysteria (Standard Edition), 2
- Gilliom, 2001, Overseers of the poor: Resistance, surveillance, and the limits of privacy
- Loyens, 2014, Coping with policy alienation in law enforcement
- 10.2307/800205 · DOI
- Monahan, 2010, Introduction, 1
- * Winter S. Baviskar Siddhartha . 2010. Street-level bureaucracy and performance: A cross-policy analysis. SFI Advisory Research Board Conference 2010 & 2010 Midwest Political Science Association Conference. SFI - The Danish National Research Centre for Social Policy. April 2010.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 752
Cejudo, G. M., & Olvera, J. G. (2026) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1093/polsoc/puag006 · Cited by 5
Andraszak, J., Alarcón, A. A., & Folch, T. M. (2023) · Violence and Gender · doi:10.1089/vio.2022.0032 · Cited by 5
“As many studies show, work pressure, stress, and insuf-ficient resources (the main reasons why service providers use coping strategies) have a significant impact on the quality of provided services (e.g., Hupe and van der Krogt, 2013; Maynard-Moody and Musheno, 2003; Tummers et al, 2015).”
The implementation of agroforestry in Namibia: A street-level bureaucracy perspective
Ndlovu, N. P., & Nzuma, T. M. (2024) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103299 · Cited by 5
Cop Wisdom and the Democratic Consequences of Citizen–State Interactions
Federman, P. S. (2021) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/00953997211046594 · Cited by 5
“Scholars also suggest that greater frequency or intensity on the job can lead to police engaging in aggressive behavior to cope with stress (Skolnick, 2011; Tummers et al., 2015).”
BackgroundHolstead, K. L., Russell, S., & Waylen, K. A. (2022) · Environmental Policy and Governance · doi:10.1002/eet.1995 · Cited by 5
“Frontline workers, faced with work pressures and a substantial degree of autonomy and influence, develop operating procedures to make their day-to-day work manageable and enable them to meet their goals (Lipsky, 1980, 2010; Tummers et al., 2015; Tuominen & Hasu, 2020; Zacka, 2017).”
BackgroundÉthier, A., Carrier, A., & Dubois, M. (2023) · Home Health Care Management & Practice · doi:10.1177/10848223231183016 · Cited by 5
Zheng, G., Ma, M., Wu, Z., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Public Personnel Management · doi:10.1177/00910260241227562 · Cited by 8
“Nevertheless, it is challenging to comprehensively capture the specific behaviors of SLBs considering the diverse array of coping strategies they may employ and their various attitudes (Tummers et al., 2015).”
InfluentialLimits of Activation? Street-Level Responses to the 2015 Refugee Challenge in German Job Centers
Falkenhain, M., & Hirseland, A. (2024) · Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies · doi:10.1080/15562948.2024.2313210 · Cited by 5
“As a rational way of coping with high workload, scant resources, and the need to fulfill institutional criteria, SLBs commonly move away from clients (Lipsky, 1980; Tummers et al., 2015).”
Andreassen, T. A., Breit, E., & Saltkjel, T. (2024) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.13035 · Cited by 5
“…requires the autonomy and ability of street-level workers to flexibly use a variety of instruments and apply their professional discretion to adjust services to individual clients (Borghi & Van Berkel, 2007; Rice, 2017; Toerien et al., 2013; Tummers et al., 2015; Van Berkel & Valkenburg, 2007).”
Headley, A. M., Baker, D. B., & Kang, I. (2025) · PAR. Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13927 · Cited by 4
ROMANIAN STREET LEVEL BUREAUCRACY: A DESCRIPTIVE FOUNDATION
BALICA, D. O., Henderson, A. C., & Ţiclău, T. (2018) · Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.24193/tras.si2018.1 · Cited by 5
“In contrast, work burdens may force SLBs to switch the focus from client-service and prioritize among clients (Baviskar apud Tummers et al., 2015), which reinforces Evans and Harris’s idea that discretion is not inherently good or bad.”
BackgroundSchütze, C. (2021) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12736 · Cited by 5
Roy, V., Leblanc-Huard, G., & Grenier, J. (2024) · Intervention · doi:10.7202/1109250ar · Cited by 5
“Dans leur recension, Tummers et al. (2015) montrent, au sujet de l’adaptation des fonctionnaires de première ligne au stress professionnel, que les T.S. ont tendance à suivre les règles de manière plus rigide que les autres professionnelles, et ce, même si cela peut desservir les usagers.”
Public servants coping with competing demands on their agency in client relationships
Tuominen, T., & Hasu, M. (2020) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-05-2019-0120 · Cited by 5
“…work, partially because the clients, organizations, occupations and political systems promote competing goals (Koppell, 2005), creating discrepancies between goals and resources and between demands for obeying formal scripts and creating individualized service (Lipsky, 1980; Tummers et al., 2015).”
BackgroundGraff, L., & Vabø, M. (2025) · European Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1080/13691457.2025.2503806 · Cited by 4
“…on Lipsky’s work by exploring alternative coping mechanisms and examining how organisational contexts, professional norms, moral values, and client characteristics influence front-line workers’ decision-making (e.g. Hasenfeld, 2010; Maynard-Moody & Musheno, 2000; Tummers et al., 2015; Zacka, 2017).”
InfluentialKaplaner, C., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2025) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muaf020 · Cited by 4
Zhao, X., Li, Y., & Yu, H. (2025) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2025.2538852 · Cited by 5
Jørring, L., Justesen, L., & Plesner, U. (2025) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2025.102058 · Cited by 5
Rethinking situated agency: an interpretive framework to policy implementation
Aprimadya, M. H. (2025) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2025.2547859 · Cited by 4
Hinterleitner, M. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780198980186.001.0001 · Cited by 5
Do No Harm: A Foundational Moral Framework for Public Administration
Ruddle, T. B., Gates, D. C., & Hart, D. K. (2025) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.70038 · Cited by 4
“Research reveals how “rigid rule following” enables harm (McGann and Ball 2024; Tummers et al. 2015).”
Li, Q., & George, B. (2025) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2025.2596789 · Cited by 4
Wursthorn, M., Saliterer, I., & Korać, S. (2023) · Review of Public Personnel Administration · doi:10.1177/0734371x231162045 · Cited by 6
“Second, given the nature of street-level bureaucrats’ daily work, the jobs are rarely characterized by “flourishing" and "growth,” but rather by “adversity” and “coping” (Lipsky, 2010; Tummers et al., 2015).”
InfluentialXu, C., & Lee, D. (2024) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13907 · Cited by 4
“Under these conditions, from the perspective of bounded rationality (Simon, 1978), frontline workers are believed to be influenced by cognitive biases when using coping strategies, which can lead to rule-breaking and discriminatory decisions (Moseley & Thomann, 2021; Tummers et al., 2015).”
Between Trust and Blame: Citizen Perceptions of Street‐Level Bureaucrats During the Pandemic
Liu, L., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.13073 · Cited by 4
“The roles and behaviors of SLBs have been characterized in different ways across the literature (Maynard-Moody and Musheno 2000; Cecchini and Harrits 2022; Tummers et al. 2015).”
InfluentialCampos, S. A., Castro, S. V., Meza, O., et al. (2020) · Revista Mexicana de Análisis Político y Administración Pública · doi:10.15174/remap.v9i18.346 · Cited by 4
Roberts, F., Amirkhanyan, A. A., Meier, K. J., et al. (2022) · International Public Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10967494.2022.2036884 · Cited by 4
“Some workers develop negative coping mechanisms such as neglect or poor service (Baggs et al. 1999; Raines 2000; Tummers et al. 2015; Wilkinson 1988).”
Integrating Nutrition Actions in Service Delivery: The Practices of Frontline Workers in Uganda
Namugumya, B. S., Candel, J., Talsma, E. F., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2022.5898 · Cited by 4
Zhang, Y., & Hu, W. (2023) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2022.2164020 · Cited by 4
“Notably, university instructors are typical street-level bureaucrats who interact directly with clients and have considerable discretion in their jobs (Lipsky, 1980; Tummers et al., 2015).”
BackgroundAções e reações : mecanismos de opressão à burocracia e sua diferentes estratégias de reação
Lotta, G., Silveira, M. C., & Fernández, M. (2023) · Livros · doi:10.38116/978-65-5635-049-3/capitulo17 · Cited by 5
Mortensen, N. M. (2023) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-06-2023-0211 · Cited by 4
Into the Unknown: Conceptualizing the Experience of Uncertainty in Citizen–State Interactions
Cecchini, M. (2024) · Perspectives on Public Management and Governance · doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvae002 · Cited by 7
Xerri, M. J., Brunetto, Y., Saccon, C., & Wankhade, P. (2024) · Public Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/07349149241268571 · Cited by 4
“These moral dilemmas are stressful for SLBs and, therefore, they make conscious and unconscious decisions about how to administer the limited public resources at their disposal, and when to administer them (Jilke & Tummers, 2018; Tummers et al., 2015).”
InfluentialWang, Y., & Pan, H. X. (2024) · Journal of Asian Public Policy · doi:10.1080/17516234.2024.2402130 · Cited by 4
“…towards the policies, they may perfunctorily and delay the implementation process, or even take behaviours that hinder the implementation of the policies, resulting in the implementation of the policies going out of shape and decreasing the degree of policy compliance (Tummers et al., 2015).”
Sabie, O. M., Nastacă, C. C., & Briscariu, R. (2025) · Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.24193/tras.74e.7 · Cited by 4
Frontmedarbejdere som professionelle samskabere
Mortensen, N. M. (2022) · Academic Quarter | Akademisk kvarter · doi:10.54337/academicquarter.vi24.7255 · Cited by 12
Merdiaty, N., Rimbun, L. R., Wijaya, P. A. D., & Shintiarafy, V. A. (2022) · International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478) · doi:10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.1812 · Cited by 5
“In this case, employees must modify their daily routines and gain up-to-date knowledge to handle heavy workloads in the final period (Tummers et al., 2015).”
BackgroundNaqvi, S. H. B., Salman, Y., Hassan, S., et al. (2024) · Journal of Humanities Social and Management Sciences (JHSMS) · doi:10.47264/idea.jhsms/5.1.8 · Cited by 4
“According to Tummers et al (2015), public administration still needs to classify coping behaviour comprehensively and shows how families and employees cope while serving by filling the gap through the model.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAccountability of Public Servants at the Street Level
Sager, F., Thomann, E., & Hupe, P. L. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_5-1 · Cited by 4
Sichling, F. (2020) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279420000392 · Cited by 5
Discretion from a Psychological Perspective
Tummers, L. G., & Bekkers, V. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19566-3_11 · Cited by 4
Self-citationBeyond paper realities : Fostering integrated nutrition governance in Uganda
Namugumya, B. S. (2021) · doi:10.18174/538348 · Cited by 4
“Invalid busyness” behaviors of a few grassroots cadres: Evidence from normative explanation
Duan, C., Zeng, Y., Zhou, Y., & Li, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027427 · Cited by 5
“Most of the existing studies measure the “invalid busyness” behavior of grassroots cadres by the following two indicators: from the perspective of work quantity, in addition to regular administrative affairs, grassroots governments have taken up a large number of “veto” temporary affairs in recent years, such as, “Day…”
BackgroundImplementación de políticas públicas. Perspectiva de los Street Level Bureaucrats. Una (re)visión
Rouquaud, I., García, M. J. R., & Herrera-Gutiérrez, M. R. (2022) · Reforma y democracia. · doi:10.69733/clad.ryd.n83.a266 · Cited by 3
Assuming accountability in the absence of control: the role of stewardship management
Ernst, M. (2025) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2025.2536154 · Cited by 3
“…research has documented how excessive reliance on control can erode trust, stifle intrinsic motivation, and result in what is sometimes referred to as ‘gaming the system’, where agents meet the letter of the law but not its intentions (Torfing and Øllgaard Bentzen 2020; L. G. Tummers et al. 2015).”
Otmani, I., Kekki, M., & Bonoli, G. (2025) · Social Policy and Administration · doi:10.1111/spol.13164 · Cited by 3
Lu, B., Guo, Y., Zhang, S., & Dong, P. (2025) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/ijegr.388562 · Cited by 3
Lucciarini, S., Santurro, M., & Rimano, A. (2025) · Journal of Public Policy · doi:10.1017/s0143814x2510086x · Cited by 3
Cao, J., & Ma, L. (2025) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.70063 · Cited by 8
Michaels, L., & Barling, D. (2025) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2025.1643778 · Cited by 3
“…decisions and actions of ground-level policy actors led to identification of local level innovation and policy entrepreneurship, and a shift to understanding the viewpoints of those actors involved in policy implementation practises (Tummers et al., 2015; Boswell and Corbett, 2015; Arnold, 2021).”
Digital inclusion – invisible work and grey zones for nurses, acting as frontline workers
Moe, C., & Skaarup, S. (2026) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-026-14040-0 · Cited by 3
“Tummers et al. [36] show how more experienced care managers balance their client´s needs against institutional frameworks and local guidelines.”
InfluentialMaking digital welfare work: conceptualizing digital compensatory work by frontline professionals
Carlsson, J. S., Hjärpe, T., & Svensson, P. (2026) · Journal of Professions and Organization · doi:10.1093/jpo/joag011 · Cited by 3
Guo, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2026) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems14040408 · Cited by 3
Pasha, O. Q., Ramanath, R., & Bajwa, Y. (2023) · Administrative Theory & Praxis · doi:10.1080/10841806.2023.2176071 · Cited by 3
“Public managers will adopt certain “ behavioral efforts … to master, tolerate, or reduce external and internal demands and conflicts they face on an everyday basis ” (Tummers et al., 2015, p. 1100).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNingrum, A. P., & Lotta, G. (2024) · Global Public Policy and Governance · doi:10.1007/s43508-023-00083-0 · Cited by 3
“Alienation can propagate a sense of disconnection and powerlessness among street-level bureaucrats, hindering their engagement in policy implementation (Tummers, 2012; Tummers et al., 2015a, 2015b).”
Gabehart, K. M., & Stefes, C. H. (2024) · German Politics · doi:10.1080/09644008.2024.2342960 · Cited by 3
“Coping strategies encompass either moving towards, away from, or against clients (Tummers et al. 2015).”
Karmsteen, K. (2024) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muae022 · Cited by 3
Gauging the Gap: Inequality of Time Use When Seeking Government Services
Briceno-Mosquera, A., & Mastracci, S. H. (2025) · Journal of Social Equity and Public Administration · doi:10.24926/jsepa.v3i2.6273 · Cited by 3
Edri‐Peer, O., Cohen, N., & Gilad, Z. (2025) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/02750740251361869 · Cited by 3
“SLBs can decide whether to assist their clients by moving towards them, minimize their interactions with their clients by moving away from them, or actively move against their clients (Tummers et al., 2015).”
Sunyehzi, D. D. K. (2022) · Social Theory & Health · doi:10.1057/s41285-022-00190-8 · Cited by 3
“The third way is ‘moving against clients’ which may be characterized by forms of aggression, confrontations or working in a hostile environment between street-level bureaucrats and clients (Tummers et al 2015; Jilke and Tummers 2018).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSunyehzi, D. D. K., Brenya, E., & Fusheini, A. (2023) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2022.2145307 · Cited by 3
“Negative discretion is also exercised in other circumstances in terms of bad faith, from frontline workers toward their clients (Tummers & Bekkers, 2014; Tummers et al, 2015; Yeboah-Assiamah et al, 2018).”
BackgroundResultScholkmann, A. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27758-0_8 · Cited by 3
Refer rather than treat: coping with uncertainty in municipal primary care clinics in India
Gore, R. (2024) · International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy · doi:10.1108/ijssp-04-2023-0090 · Cited by 3
Ali, M. U., & Wright, J. E. (2024) · American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/02750740241229998 · Cited by 4
“These assumptions and associated practices are coping responses to structural and organizational demands and emerge as of fi cers negotiate behaviors that are viewed as facilitating the attainment of valued organizational goals (Tummers et al., 2015).”
BackgroundHow do street‐level organisations adapt to a new policy framework? Evidence from a Swiss canton
Domenig, C., & Sager, F. (2024) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12646 · Cited by 3
“If policy requirements seem incompatible with the needs of the clients, the implementing agents find themselves in a role conflict, which they can overcome by bending and adapting the rules in favour of the clients (Tummers et al., 2015, p. 1109).”
BackgroundVeilederblikket: Hvordan arbeidsbetingelser former Nav-ansattes syn på brukerne og deres problemer
Andresen, S. A., & Volckmar‐Eeg, M. G. (2024) · Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning · doi:10.18261/tfs.65.3.1 · Cited by 3
Overburdened Bureaucrats: Providing Equal Access to Public Services During COVID-19
Kolstad, K. L. (2024) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/734270 · Cited by 3
Nakamura, A. (2025) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12660 · Cited by 3
Brunetto, Y., Farr‐Wharton, B., Grande, A. H., Sharafizad, F., & Richman, M. (2025) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2025.2479872 · Cited by 4
“According to Lipsky (1980) SLBs use their discretionary power to develop routines that help them cope with making decisions about who will get what Tummers et al. (2015) argue that there are three options for SLBs, (a) they can move towards the client and deliver a service that will benefit them;…”
Raab, M. (2025) · International Journal of Social Welfare · doi:10.1111/ijsw.70017 · Cited by 3
Digitalisation and meaningful frontline work: insights from the Danish public employment services
Jørring, L. (2025) · European Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1080/13691457.2025.2518269 · Cited by 4
“In the interviews, the caseworkers did express a wish for greater simplicity and support in their work, which resonates with street-level studies that state that high work pressures and uncertainties are inherent in frontline work (Lipsky, 2010; Tummers et al., 2015).”
Public Servants at the Regulatory Front Lines: Street-Level Enforcement in Theory and Practice
de Winter, P., & Hertogh, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29980-4_4 · Cited by 4
Styring, professionel dømmekraft og faldgruber for fagprofessionel værdiskabelse
Møller, M. Ø. (2018) · Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier · doi:10.7146/tfp.v14i26.104812 · Cited by 3
Civinskas, R., Dvořák, J., & Šumskas, G. (2021) · Regional Formation and Development Studies · doi:10.15181/rfds.v33i1.2195 · Cited by 3
Mohammed, A. (2019) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 3
Professionalism, P. (2016) · Professions and Professionalism · doi:10.7577/pp.1711 · Cited by 3
Service Models in the Public Sector
Schedler, K., & Guenduez, A. A. (2024) · Yearbook of Swiss Administrative Sciences · doi:10.5334/ssas.222 · Cited by 3
Bergmark, Å., & Stranz, H. (2025) · Journal of Poverty and Social Justice · doi:10.1332/17598273y2024d000000037 · Cited by 2
Zheng, R., & Liu, N. (2025) · Journal of Chinese Governance · doi:10.1080/23812346.2025.2520111 · Cited by 2
Unveiling how power manifests in street-level interactions: implications for value co-creation
Rønshaugen, M., Magnussen, S. F., & Sønderskov, M. (2025) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2025.2536155 · Cited by 3
“Furthermore, SLBs have the discretion to bend or disregard rules to meet clients’ needs (Dubois 2010; Gofen 2014; Tummers et al. 2015; Zacka 2017).”
Faas, L., Houtgraaf, G., Kruyen, P. M., & van Thiel, S. (2025) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.70018 · Cited by 3
Street-Level Innovators: The Role of Street-Level Bureaucrats in Driving Local Innovation
Uziel, V. (2025) · Journal of Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.11648/j.jppa.20250903.17 · Cited by 2
Coping with occupational stereotypes: an emotional lens on police officers’ experiences
Neo, S., & Overman, S. (2025) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2025.2567634 · Cited by 2
“The resulting model from our analysis revealed six major emotional families (anger, hurt, resignation, empathy, apprehension, general emotional exhaustion) and three types of coping behaviours similar to Tummers et al. (2015) (moving towards, away and against client).”
InfluentialDiscretionary Authority Coping and Stress in Human Service Organizations
Szücs, S., Berlin, J. M., Höjer, S., & Liljegren, A. (2025) · Human Services Organizations Management Leadership & Governance · doi:10.1080/23303131.2025.2580018 · Cited by 2
“…coping – and the ways to cope during public service delivery have previously been presented through the systematic review of the literature (Tummers et al., 2015) – it is expected that frontline workers with discretionary powers in human service organizations, such as the police, social…”
InfluentialCohen, N., & Lazebnik, T. (2025) · European Policy Analysis · doi:10.1002/epa2.70024 · Cited by 2
Carlsson, H., Glimmerveen, L. M., & Visser, E. L. (2025) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muaf033 · Cited by 2
Mousa, M. (2026) · Public Administration and Development · doi:10.1002/pad.70061 · Cited by 2
“…and emotionally demanding roles, such as medication dispensing and direct client service, to younger pharmacists, while they themselves focus on non‐ clinical responsibilities that better align with their current physical, cognitive, and mental conditions (Skinner et al. 2003; Tummers et al. 2015).”
InfluentialKarki, S., Das, S., Radovich, E., et al. (2026) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001340 · Cited by 2
“Data displays (tables of themes and examples), using SLB theory to structure the results [35,36], helped guide the discussion of the findings and informed the final interpretation.”
Fairness Perception, Administrative Burden, and Social Welfare Participation
Shen, Y., Wei, W., An, C., & Chen, Z. (2026) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.70067 · Cited by 2
Conceptualizing the Street‐Level Bureaucrat Construct
Cheema, F. S., Lee, E., Gupta, R., & Perry, J. L. (2026) · Public Administration and Development · doi:10.1002/pad.70093 · Cited by 2
Bardmann, M.-M., & Ruiner, C. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119470 · Cited by 2
Front-line work and interpretive labor in an Angolan development program
Peters, R. W. (2019) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171.2019.1630658 · Cited by 2
“…part of the very definition of being a ‘street-level bureaucrat,’ and must therefore creatively manage their resources and tasks in ways that policy makers and even direct supervisors may not expect, or support (Durose 2011; Lipsky 2010 [1980]; Tummers et al. 2015; Maynard-Moody and Musheno 2000).”
BackgroundCappellato, V., & Cataldi, L. (2019) · SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO · doi:10.3280/sl2019-155005 · Cited by 2
Evolving willingness and ability interfaces: An innovation led transformation journey
Grant, D., Jha, P., Wanjiru, R., & Bhalla, A. (2020) · International Journal of Innovation Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijis.2020.06.001 · Cited by 2
Ankersen, P. V., Steffensen, R. G., Blæhr, E. E., & Beedholm, K. (2021) · Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.1108/jica-07-2020-0047 · Cited by 2
Israel, P., Raae, J. F., & Bjørnestad, J. R. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1254700 · Cited by 3
“The process is complex, and counselors often face dilemmas that challenge their ethical code, feasibility, and pragmatic implications (Tummers et al., 2015; Trappenburg et al., 2020).”
BackgroundKjellberg, J. (2023) · Nordic Social Work Research · doi:10.1080/2156857x.2023.2297987 · Cited by 2
“An important point of departure for the analysis is that the organization and its context shapes social workers’ discretion (cf. Brodkin 1997; Ellis 2011; Tummers et al. 2015).”
Visser, V., de Koster, W., & van Buuren, A. (2024) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/00953997241228872 · Cited by 3
“In line with the idea of “policy alienation” (Tummers, 2017), we see that respondents question the purpose of the policy regulation and whether it serves the people who need it, which inspires them to bend the rules (Tummers et al., 2015).”
Backgroundde Andrade, L. H. A., & Pekkola, E. (2024) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-08-2023-0240 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Tummers, L. L. G., Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
- University of California System (US)
- ORCID
- Musheno, Michael
- Venue
- Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-01-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1099-1126
- ISSN
- 1053-1858 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9803
- OpenAlex
- W1998134118
- Cited by
- 756
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 118 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 10
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Georgia
- University of Washington
- University of Kansas
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- European Commission (329519)
- Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
- Universiteit Utrecht
- Université de Lausanne
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- coping, public service delivery, frontline workers, occupational stress, workload, discretion, teachers, social workers, police officers, rule violations, public administration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review