Perceived acceptability and appropriateness of a web-based program targeting risk for anxiety in young children and their parents
Open accessAbstract
Objective: This mixed-methods study examined perceived acceptability and appropriateness of a novel digital mental health program targeting anxiety risk (i.e., perfectionism or error sensitivity) in 5-to-7-year-old children and their parents. Methods: Parent–child dyads participated in a modular, web-based cognitive-behavioral program targeting negative overreactions to making mistakes. The program, “Making Mistakes”, consisted of a 6-month series of short video clips, journaling activities, and weekly reminders, and modules were delivered to caregivers and children separately. 86 dyads completed self-report measures, 18 of whom participated in semi-structured interviews, following completion of the primary program module. A standard thematic analysis was used to elucidate themes from the parent and child interview content. Results: Our quantitative and qualitative results were generally aligned. Children and parents viewed the novel digital mental health program as acceptable and appropriate, favoring the cognitive behavioral strategies such as modeling positive reactions to mistakes, responding positively to child mistakes, and emphasizing effort over outcome. Participants also provided helpful feedback related to program content, delivery, and engagement, as well as suggestions to enhance the program. Conclusions: Findings have implications for design and content features of parent-based and dyad-based programs, as well as digital mental health programs focused on reducing anxiety risk. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
10 of 34 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A handful of studies have used mixed methods to typify implementation outcomes in family- and parent-based intervention programs.
“A handful of studies have used mixed methods to typify implementation outcomes in family-and parent-based intervention programs (e.g., Czymoniewicz-Klippel et al., 2017;Hickey et al., 2021;Leckey et al., 2021;Lewis et al., 2016Lewis et al., , 2020;;Liverpool & Edbrooke-Childs, 2021;O'Byrne, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
Participants favored the cognitive behavioral strategies such as modeling positive reactions to mistakes, responding positively to child mistakes, and emphasizing effort over outcome.
“favoring the cognitive behavioral strategies such as modeling positive reactions to mistakes, responding positively to child mistakes, and emphasizing effort over outcome.”
- Also stated in: § Specific strategies · plain
“Parents cited modeling positive reactions to mistakes and responding positively to child mistakes as the most commonly implemented strategies.”
- Also stated in: § Specific strategies · plain
“Though less often described as having been implemented, emphasizing effort over outcome, modeling trying new and challenging things, and encouraging one's child to try hard things were also viewed favorably.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Specific strategies · plain
- Findingown data
Many children successfully encoded the skill to think about mistakes more positively, as noted by both child and parent interviewees.
“Many children successfully encoded the skill to think about mistakes more positively, which was noted by both child and parent interviewees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All parent measures of acceptability and appropriateness were significantly correlated.
“All parent measures of acceptability and appropriateness were significantly correlated; AIM & IAM: r(40) ¼ .90,p < .001;AIM & PAARI-14: r(40) ¼ .83,p < .001;IAM & PAARI-14: r(40) ¼ .87,p < .001”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Parents cited modeling positive reactions to mistakes and responding positively to child mistakes as the most commonly implemented strategies.
“Parents cited modeling positive reactions to mistakes and responding positively to child mistakes as the most commonly implemented strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Parents suggested program content enhancements, such as reducing repetitiveness and providing more specific examples and suggested ways to practice concepts in real life.
“Parents suggested program content enhancements, such as reducing the repetitiveness of information, and providing more specific examples and suggested ways to practice the concepts in real life”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Child perceptions of acceptability, appropriateness, and responsiveness via the CAARI were favorable.
“With respect to child perceptions of acceptability, appropriateness, and responsiveness, average ratings were also favorable as assessed via the CAARI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Children felt especially positively about the delivery of the program, related to child-friendly features (e.g., short videos with animations and characters, prizes, gamification).
“Children felt especially positively about the delivery of the program, related to the child-friendly features (e.g., short videos with animations and characters, prizes, gamification).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants felt positively about the program's delivery and usability.
“Participants felt positively about the program's delivery and usability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Parents welcomed content describing risk factors for developing error sensitivity, including parenting behaviors.
“and they welcomed content describing risk factors for developing error sensitivity, including parenting behaviors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants unanimously felt that the program ideas were generally positive and valuable.
“Participants unanimously felt that the program ideas were generally positive and valuable”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Parents and children viewed the novel digital mental health program as acceptable and appropriate.
“Children and parents viewed the novel digital mental health program as acceptable and appropriate”
- Also stated in: § Results · hedged
“Our quantitative and qualitative results generally aligned, with most respondents reporting high or moderate levels of acceptability and appropriateness.”
- Also stated in: § Content Embraced and Implemented · hedged
“The program content was largely acceptable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · hedged
- Findingown data
Children varied in their understanding and utilization of specific strategies.
“Children varied in terms of their understanding and utilization of specific strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Many parents felt that the content would be healthy for their developing child.
“and many parents felt that the content would be healthy for their developing child.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Parents appreciated receiving both the reminder texts and emails, which included direct links to the weekly module videos.
“Parents appreciated receiving both the reminder texts and emails, which included direct links to the weekly module videos.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The study's quantitative and qualitative results were generally aligned.
“Our quantitative and qualitative results were generally aligned.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Our quantitative and qualitative results generally aligned”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
Average parent ratings of acceptability via the AIM and appropriateness via the IAM were fairly high.
“Average parent ratings of acceptability via the AIM, and appropriateness via the IAM, were fairly high (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Parents expressed that their children enjoyed the program.
“and expressed that their children enjoyed the program, too.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Parents appreciated learning about error sensitivity and strategies to address it.
“Parents appreciated learning about error sensitivity and strategies to address it”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Parent-perceived acceptability, appropriateness, and patient responsiveness via the PAARI-14 was favorable.
“Parent-perceived acceptability, appropriateness, and patient responsiveness via the PAARI-14 was also favorable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Parents felt the children's content was useful for their children.
“parents felt the children's content was useful for their children”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Parents were encouraged by the brief weekly reminders included in the engagement messages.
“Parents were also encouraged by the brief weekly reminders included in the engagement messages”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Parents found the journal activities helpful.
“Parents found the journal activities helpful, though some noted confusion during the few weekly videos that did not have an accompanying journal activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Respondents provided numerous suggestions to enhance both the program content and the delivery and engagement features of the program.
“In addition, respondents provided numerous suggestions to enhance both the program content and the delivery and engagement features of the program.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some noted exposure (making mistakes on purpose) was inappropriate for older children or for their own family.
“In addition, specific strategies taught were largely viewed as appropriate, though some noted exposure (making mistakes on purpose) was inappropriate for older children or for their own family.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Parents' preferences differed with respect to viewing modality (phone or computer).
“Parents' preferences differed with respect to viewing modality (i.e., phone or computer), and thus the program being mobile-and browserfriendly was seen as a strength of the program.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some respondents desired greater infusion of gamification throughout the program for both children and adults.
“Regarding engagement techniques, respondents generally found the videos acceptably engaging, though some wanted more visual appeal, and some desired greater infusion of gamification throughout the program (for both children and adults).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Respondents generally found the videos acceptably engaging.
“Regarding engagement techniques, respondents generally found the videos acceptably engaging, though some wanted more visual appeal, and some desired greater infusion of gamification throughout the program (for both children and adults).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most interviewees consisted of college-educated, White/non-Hispanic, multi-parent families living above the federal poverty line.
“Importantly, most interviewees consisted of collegeeducated, White/non-Hispanic, multi-parent families living above the federal poverty line.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Quantitative measures revealed similarly high ratings of perceived appropriateness from parents and children.
“Quantitative measures revealed similarly high ratings of perceived appropriateness from parents and children.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The quantitative acceptability and appropriateness measures validly assess these constructs in parents and children.
- Findingown data
Making mistakes on purpose was acceptable to most participants.
“Making mistakes on purpose was acceptable to most, though some indicated they did not know how to implement this strategy practically.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was considerable variability in interviewees' preferences for program format (e.g., website, mobile app, paper-only, DVD).
“However, there was considerable variability in interviewees' preferences (e.g., website, mobile app, paper-only, DVD).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Families appreciated the ability to flexibly complete the program activities.
“Families appreciated the ability to flexibly complete the program activities; few families completed them exactly as prescribed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Regarding perceived appropriateness of program format, there was considerable heterogeneity.
“Regarding perceived appropriateness of program format, there was considerable heterogeneity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Parents of younger children noted that limited writing fluency hampered participation, placing more burden on the parent to help the child complete the weekly activities.
“Importantly, parents of younger children noted that limited writing fluency hampered participation, placing more burden on the parent to help the child complete the weekly activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Families with greater perceived need for the program, based on family characteristics or relational problems, tended to express a preference for longer and more in-depth activities.
“It appeared that families with greater perceived need for the program, based on family characteristics or relational problems, tended to express a preference for longer and more in-depth activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some families wanted longer weekly videos.
“Indeed, families showed a wide variety of preferences for the frequency and intensity of the program: many felt weekly was appropriate and helped them stay on track, though some wanted longer weekly videos; others preferred a lower frequency (e.g., every two weeks, monthly) but with longer videos; still others wanted to learn the content all in one sitting, or across a few sittings scheduled in p”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Children appeared to find all concepts acceptable.
“Children appeared to find all concepts acceptable; for some children, content was misunderstood, misremembered, or not recalled (e.g., some reported that making mistakes is not okay).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some parents noted confusion during the few weekly videos that did not have an accompanying journal activity.
“Parents found the journal activities helpful, though some noted confusion during the few weekly videos that did not have an accompanying journal activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some respondents wanted more visual appeal in the videos.
“Regarding engagement techniques, respondents generally found the videos acceptably engaging, though some wanted more visual appeal, and some desired greater infusion of gamification throughout the program (for both children and adults).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some families preferred a lower frequency (e.g., every two weeks, monthly) but with longer videos.
“Indeed, families showed a wide variety of preferences for the frequency and intensity of the program: many felt weekly was appropriate and helped them stay on track, though some wanted longer weekly videos; others preferred a lower frequency (e.g., every two weeks, monthly) but with longer videos; still others wanted to learn the content all in one sitting, or across a few sittings scheduled in p”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All quantitative measures of acceptability for both parents and children indicated positive ratings of perceived acceptability.
“All quantitative measures of acceptability for both parents and children indicated positive ratings of perceived acceptability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The quantitative acceptability and appropriateness measures validly assess these constructs in parents and children.
- Findingown data
For some children, content was misunderstood, misremembered, or not recalled.
“Children appeared to find all concepts acceptable; for some children, content was misunderstood, misremembered, or not recalled (e.g., some reported that making mistakes is not okay).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Our study shows that parenting strategies targeting error sensitivity, as well as child-focused strategies, are perceived favorably by a wide range of parents.
“Moreover, our study shows that parenting strategies targeting error sensitivity, as well as child-focused strategies, are perceived favorably by a wide range of parents, and thus these strategies could be prescribed by those who work with families (pediatricians, teachers, child therapists) across contexts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Email and text-message reminders facilitated family participation.
“All caregivers found the email and text-message reminders acceptable, which facilitated family participation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some families reported website-related barriers, including the login and being unable to track activity completion.
“However, some reported websiterelated barriers, including the login and being unable to track activity completion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most families found the website with short videos, as well as the accompanying activity journals, acceptable.
“Regarding intervention format, most families found the website with short videos, as well as the accompanying activity journals, acceptable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Families who described more problems with child emotions or behavior, parent-child interactions, or higher levels of parental criticism or error sensitivity, appeared to prefer more intensive intervention components.
“Though specific subgroup analyses were not conducted, families who described more problems with child emotions or behavior, parent-child interactions, or higher levels of parental criticism or error sensitivity, appeared to prefer more intensive intervention components.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Families showed a wide variety of preferences for the frequency and intensity of the program.
“Indeed, families showed a wide variety of preferences for the frequency and intensity of the program: many felt weekly was appropriate and helped them stay on track, though some wanted longer weekly videos; others preferred a lower frequency (e.g., every two weeks, monthly) but with longer videos; still others wanted to learn the content all in one sitting, or across a few sittings scheduled in p”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The low durability and nondigitization of the paper journals decreased acceptability for some.
“Similarly, the low durability and nondigitization of the paper journals decreased acceptability for some.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Many respondents expressed a preference to access all the program components, particularly the paper journal activity, via a mobile application.
“Relatedly, many respondents expressed a preference to access all the program components, and particularly the paper journal activity, via a mobile application.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Children found the program videos engaging.
“Children found the videos engaging; they enjoyed particular videos, songs, or characters, and they enjoyed the gamification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Qualitative data indicated that for most participants, all strategies taught were acceptable.
“Qualitative data indicated that for most participants, all strategies taught were acceptable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
None of the families requested a lower frequency of text and email reminders.
“Importantly, none requested a lower frequency of text and email reminders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Caregiver psychoeducation led caregivers to believe the program content was important for their child's healthy development.
“Qualitatively, caregiver psychoeducation on error sensitivity (i.e., defining error sensitivity, describing potential sequelae and environmental/familial/heritable risk factors) contributed substantially to perceived appropriateness, leading caregivers to believe the program content was important for their child's healthy development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Children enjoyed particular videos, songs, or characters.
“Children found the videos engaging; they enjoyed particular videos, songs, or characters, and they enjoyed the gamification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Specific strategies taught were largely viewed as appropriate.
“In addition, specific strategies taught were largely viewed as appropriate, though some noted exposure (making mistakes on purpose) was inappropriate for older children or for their own family.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Caregivers, and some children, provided numerous suggestions to improve the prototype intervention.
“Caregivers, and some children, provided numerous suggestions to improve the prototype intervention (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some participants indicated they did not know how to implement the strategy of making mistakes on purpose practically.
“Making mistakes on purpose was acceptable to most, though some indicated they did not know how to implement this strategy practically.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Caregiver psychoeducation on error sensitivity contributed substantially to perceived appropriateness.
“Qualitatively, caregiver psychoeducation on error sensitivity (i.e., defining error sensitivity, describing potential sequelae and environmental/familial/heritable risk factors) contributed substantially to perceived appropriateness, leading caregivers to believe the program content was important for their child's healthy development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The program being mobile- and browser-friendly was seen as a strength of the program.
“Parents' preferences differed with respect to viewing modality (i.e., phone or computer), and thus the program being mobile-and browserfriendly was seen as a strength of the program.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All caregivers found the email and text-message reminders acceptable.
“All caregivers found the email and text-message reminders acceptable, which facilitated family participation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Few families completed the program activities exactly as prescribed.
“Families appreciated the ability to flexibly complete the program activities; few families completed them exactly as prescribed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For caregivers, the strategies of modeling positive reactions to mistakes and responding positively to child mistakes were the most commonly enacted.
“For caregivers, the strategies of modeling positive reactions to mistakes and responding positively to child mistakes were the most commonly enacted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Anxious children have a larger neural response to their own mistakes (i.e., larger ERN amplitude) than nonanxious children.
“Anxious children have a larger neural response to their own mistakes (i.e., larger ERN amplitude) than nonanxious children, and this elevated neural response has been shown to increase risk for the development of clinical levels of anxiety (Meyer, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Meyer, 2022 source
- Premisecitation
A web-based selective preventive program targeting error sensitivity in 5-7-year-old children and their parents has shown pilot efficacy in children.
“Based on models emphasizing the role of caregivers in child perfectionism, a web-based selective preventive program targeting error sensitivity in 5-7-year-old children and their parents has shown pilot efficacy in children (Meyer et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Meyer et al., 2023 source
- Premisecitation
Elevated ERN amplitude increases risk for the development of clinical levels of anxiety.
“this elevated neural response has been shown to increase risk for the development of clinical levels of anxiety (Meyer, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Meyer, 2022 source
- Premisecitation
Improvements in early childhood emotional and behavioral self-regulation have been correlated with positive distal outcomes on a range of adolescent health measures, including substance use, academic achievement, suicidality, and delinquency.
“Indeed, improvements in early childhood emotional and behavioral self-regulation have been correlated with positive distal outcomes on a range of adolescent health measures, including substance use, academic achievement, suicidality, and delinquency (Howard & Williams, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Howard & Williams, 2018 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Reduction of early childhood error sensitivity may decrease risk for childhood/adolescent disorders of emotion regulation.
“Moreover, reduction of early childhood error sensitivity may decrease risk for childhood/adolescent disorders of emotion regulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Caregivers can contribute to children's maladaptive perfectionism via behaviors such as setting unreasonably high standards, focusing on error avoidance, and modeling perfectionistic behavior to children.
“Caregivers can contribute to children's maladaptive perfectionism via behaviors such as setting unreasonably high standards, focusing on error avoidance, and modeling perfectionistic behavior to children (Flett et al., 2002;Mitchell et al., 2013;Smith et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Study design and conductreasoning
Data were sufficiently saturated following an interview sample of 18 dyads (18 adults, 14 children).
“Data were sufficiently saturated following an interview sample of 18 dyads (18 adults, 14 children).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Overall, this work supports the use of web-based programs as a well-tolerated approach to engage families in child health-promoting practices.
“Overall, this work supports the use of web-based programs as a welltolerated approach to engage families in child healthpromoting practices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Results may not fully generalize to marginalized families, who often face more barriers to participation in psychosocial services.
“Therefore, results may not fully generalize to marginalized families, who often face more barriers to participation in psychosocial services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This study provided quantitative and qualitative support for the perceived acceptability and appropriateness of a novel web-based program targeting error sensitivity in parent-child dyads.
“This study provided quantitative and qualitative support for the perceived acceptability and appropriateness of a novel web-based program targeting error sensitivity in parent-child dyads.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The use of mixed methods with heterogenous perspectives represented among interviewees allowed for both breadth and depth of understanding.
“First, the use of mixed methods with heterogenous perspectives represented among interviewees allowed for both breadth and depth of understanding; moreover, convergence of qualitative and quantitative data enhances confidence in the findings on perceived appropriateness and acceptability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Dyads did not need to engage in the program with perfect adherence to enact strategies learned and achieve benefits from participation.
“An important finding, however, was that dyads did not need to engage in the program with perfect adherence to enact strategies learned and achieve benefits from participation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Specific subgroup analyses were not conducted.
“Though specific subgroup analyses were not conducted, families who described more problems with child emotions or behavior, parent-child interactions, or higher levels of parental criticism or error sensitivity, appeared to prefer more intensive intervention components.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Quantitative and qualitative data converged in demonstrating that the program was viewed as largely acceptable and appropriate to both parents and children.
“Quantitative and qualitative data converged in demonstrating that the program was viewed as largely acceptable and appropriate to both parents and children.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
- May combine two claims. 29
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationMixed methods were used to examine convergence of the data types (triangulation) and complementarity (elaboration) to provide both breadth and depth of understanding of the implementation outcomes.
“Mixed methods were used to examine convergence of the data types (i.e., triangulation) and complementarity (i.e., elaboration) to provide both breadth and depth of understanding of the implementation outcomes (Palinkas et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Palinkas et al., 2011 source
The Mixed Method Function and Mixed Method Structure sections describe triangulation as convergence, complementarity as addressing related questions, and qualitative and quantitative methods as providing depth and breadth of understanding. The Discussion applies breadth to implementation outcomes, but describes depth as understanding implementation processes and context, not the outcomes themselves. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationResearch in adults suggests those with high levels of maladaptive perfectionism have poorer physical health outcomes, including earlier mortality, poorer coping with chronic illness, and lower subjective physical health.
“Research in adults suggests those with high levels of maladaptive perfectionism have poorer physical health outcomes, including earlier mortality, poorer coping with chronic illness, and lower subjective physical health (Molnar et al., 2020;Sirois & Molnar, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Molnar et al., 2020 source
The Abstract reports poorer physical health among the high-perfectionism profiles, including in adults with chronic illness, and cites a longitudinal study linking perfectionism to earlier mortality. The chronic-illness results report physical health, stress, and social support, but do not establish poorer coping with chronic illness specifically. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Sirois & Molnar, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA systematic review of preventive digital interventions for mental health in youth identified only 3 such programs, with no preventive program including children younger than age 7.
“A systematic review of preventive digital interventions for mental health in youth identified only 3 such programs, with no preventive program including children younger than age 7 (Bergin et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bergin et al., 2020 source
The Abstract reports 21 different interventions across 30 publications; the figure of three refers only to selective-prevention studies, not all preventive programs. Results > User characteristics (page unavailable) says no interventions were aimed at children aged six or younger. The paper calls itself a scoping review, rather than a systematic review. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMixed qualitative and quantitative approaches can yield richer information than either method alone for studying implementation outcomes.
“To study implementation outcomes, mixed qualitative and quantitative approaches can yield richer information than either method alone (Landsverk et al., 2012;Palinkas et al., 2011;Proctor et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Landsverk et al., 2012 source
- cites Palinkas et al., 2011 source
- cites Proctor et al., 2009 source
“The Challenge of Implementation Research Methods” discusses measuring implementation outcomes and using multilevel designs, while “Multi-level Models of Change” mentions qualitative studies and statistical approaches separately. Our copy does not say that combining qualitative and quantitative methods yields richer information than either alone (searched: mixed methods, qualitative quantitative). (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudies cite the implementation outcomes taxonomy and use thematic analysis via the framework method, yielding themes focused on content and design; implementation outcomes; recruitment; and parenting strategies.
“Studies cite the implementation outcomes taxonomy (Proctor et al., 2011) and use thematic analysis via the framework method (Braun & Clarke, 2006;Pope et al., 2000), yielding themes focused on content and design; implementation outcomes; recruitment; and parenting strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationA combination of random and convenience sampling was used for the first 10 interviewees, followed by a strategic sampling approach to ensure participant diversity and approximate demographic diversity in the overall study.
“A combination of random and convenience sampling was used for the first 10 interviewees (i.e., recruited any participants finishing the study during the recruitment period), followed by a strategic sampling approach (Morse, 2015;Palinkas et al., 2015) to ensure participant diversity and approximate demographic diversity in the overall study (e.g., with respect to age, gender, race/ethnicity, SES).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA systematic review showed promising effects of digital health applications for psychological maladjustment associated with pediatric medical conditions-effective program components included problem solving, education, communication, and behavior management.
“Indeed, a systematic review showed promising effects of digital health applications for psychological maladjustment associated with pediatric medical conditions-effective program components included problem solving, education, communication, and behavior management (McGar et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites McGar et al., 2019 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOther suggestions focused on adding content relevant to families' particular situations (e.g., how to address bullying, hyperactivity, misbehavior).
“other suggestions focused on adding content that was relevant to families' particular situations (e.g., how to address bullying, hyperactivity, misbehavior).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParents were open to general positive parenting strategies not specifically focused on error sensitivity, and some found the reminders helpful even when the concepts were already known.
“Regarding general positive parenting strategies that were not specifically focused on error sensitivity (i.e., positive attention/reinforcement, use of special time), parents were open to these strategies and some found the reminders helpful, even when the concepts were already known.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome children provided off-topic responses revealing they had not encoded the concepts taught in the child-focused content, with a couple expressing they learned that it is not okay to make mistakes.
“In contrast, some children provided off-topic responses that revealed they had not encoded the concepts taught in the child-focused content, with a couple of children expressing they learned that it is not okay to make mistakes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome families suggested it would be helpful to include cooperative parent-child games as part of the program curriculum.
“some families suggested it would be helpful to include cooperative parent-child games as a part of the program curriculum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEmphasizing effort over outcome, modeling trying new and challenging things, and encouraging one's child to try hard things were viewed favorably, though less often described as implemented.
“Though less often described as having been implemented, emphasizing effort over outcome, modeling trying new and challenging things, and encouraging one's child to try hard things were also viewed favorably.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome parents expressed the child content would be enhanced with more examples or opportunities to practice responding appropriately in real-life situations.
“some parents expressed the child content would be enhanced with more examples or opportunities to practice responding appropriately in real-life situations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo parents did not fully understand the concept of error sensitivity but still reported the program to be highly acceptable.
“Of note, two parents did not fully understand the concept of error sensitivity; however, they still reported the program to be highly acceptable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParents described implementing or learning strategies not explicitly taught, including leaving trivial errors uncorrected, being less critical, naming or describing their mistakes, and rectifying initial overreactions to child errors.
“Interestingly, parents described implementing or learning strategies not explicitly taught, including leaving trivial errors uncorrected, being less critical, naming or describing their mistakes, and rectifying initial overreactions to child errors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParents had mixed views of making mistakes on purpose, while children generally accepted it.
“Parents had mixed views of making mistakes on purpose, while children generally accepted it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe AIM and IAM demonstrated excellent reliability: Cronbach's α (AIM) = .97; α (IAM) = .96.
“The AIM and IAM demonstrated excellent reliability: Cronbach's α (AIM) ¼ .97;α (IAM) ¼ .96.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome children wanted the videos to be longer.
“Some children also wanted the videos to be longer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInterviewees described the program's rationale provision as a key motivator to both engage with the intervention program and to implement the strategies learned.
“Interviewees described the program's rationale provision as a key motivator to both engage with the intervention program and to implement the strategies learned.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost parents found the weekly videos sufficiently engaging, whereas some parents expressed the videos appeared too basic or simple.
“Most parents found the weekly videos sufficiently engaging, whereas some parents expressed the videos appeared too basic or simple.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome parents expressed a desire for less superficial and more applied weekly journal assignments.
“some parents expressed a desire for less superficial and more applied weekly journal assignments”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome parents wanted to be able to customize the delivery timing of the reminders.
“some wanted to be able to customize the delivery timing of the reminders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParents expressed that their children's enjoyment of the content facilitated their own participation.
“Parents expressed that their children's enjoyment of the content facilitated their own participation, and they believed the program could benefit from even more gamification for both parents and children.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMany families felt weekly was appropriate and helped them stay on track.
“Indeed, families showed a wide variety of preferences for the frequency and intensity of the program: many felt weekly was appropriate and helped them stay on track, though some wanted longer weekly videos; others preferred a lower frequency (e.g., every two weeks, monthly) but with longer videos; still others wanted to learn the content all in one sitting, or across a few sittings scheduled in p”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataBroadly, interviewees suggested making the program more engaging, user-friendly, and relevant.
“Broadly, interviewees suggested making the program more engaging, user-friendly, and relevant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants largely found the program was easy to use and worked well.
“Participants largely found the program was easy to use and worked well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenInterviews with children added incrementally useful information; child interviews yielded insight into the topics children had explicitly encoded, and which features of the program were most salient or memorable.
“Indeed, interviews with children added incrementally useful information; child interviews yielded insight into the topics children had explicitly encoded, and which features of the program were most salient or memorable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataChildren enjoyed the gamification.
“Children found the videos engaging; they enjoyed particular videos, songs, or characters, and they enjoyed the gamification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPreferences for format (e.g., paper vs. digital, guided vs. self-guided, mobile app vs. website) and dose (length and frequency of videos, depth of homework assignments) varied widely.
“Preferences for format (e.g., paper vs. digital, guided vs. self-guided, mobile app vs. website, etc.) and dose (i.e., length and frequency of videos, depth of homework assignments) varied widely.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome families wanted to learn the content all in one sitting, or across a few sittings scheduled in person.
“Indeed, families showed a wide variety of preferences for the frequency and intensity of the program: many felt weekly was appropriate and helped them stay on track, though some wanted longer weekly videos; others preferred a lower frequency (e.g., every two weeks, monthly) but with longer videos; still others wanted to learn the content all in one sitting, or across a few sittings scheduled in p”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOther intervention content was also broadly acceptable, including psychoeducation, challenging oneself, encouraging child effort, labeled praise, and special time.
“Other intervention content was also broadly acceptable, including psychoeducation, challenging oneself, encouraging child effort, labeled praise, and special time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParents appreciated the multimodal information delivery and receiving direct links to the weekly videos.
“Parents appreciated the multimodal information delivery (i.e., video slide show, text, and audio voiceover) and receiving direct links to the weekly videos.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThere was a very strong positive relation between perceived acceptability and appropriateness as well as concordance between measures.
“indicating a very strong positive relation between perceived acceptability and appropriateness as well as concordance between measures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA few perfectionism-focused programs have been developed for youth; most were developed by Wade and colleagues as preventive, school-based programs for perfectionistic adolescents between age 10 and 19, or as universal prevention approaches.
“A few perfectionism-focused programs have been developed for youth; most were developed by Wade and colleagues as preventive, school-based programs for perfectionistic adolescents between age 10 and 19, or as universal prevention approaches (e.g., Fairweather-Schmidt & Wade, 2015;Shu et al., 2019)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe lead author kept fieldnotes throughout the study process, including a memos log and interviewer journal, to contextualize the interview transcripts; track coding and analytic decisions; and consider author positionality in the analyses.
“In addition, the lead author (IM) kept fieldnotes throughout the study process, including a memos log and interviewer journal, to contextualize the interview transcripts; track coding and analytic decisions; and consider author positionality in the analyses (Malterud, 2001;Miles et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Malterud, 2001 source
- cites Miles et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationPerfectionism in children and caregivers may be an appropriate transdiagnostic intervention target in the management of illnesses such as chronic pain.
“Perfectionism in children and caregivers may thus be an appropriate transdiagnostic intervention target in the management of illnesses such as chronic pain (Randall, Gray, et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Randall, Gray, et al., 2018 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNo programs have focused on young children, none have focused specifically on error sensitivity, and only one paper reported the perceived acceptability and appropriateness of a program for teens.
“Importantly, no programs have focused on young children, none have focused specifically on error sensitivity, and only one paper reported the perceived acceptability and appropriateness of a program for teens (i.e., Nehmy & Wade, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nehmy & Wade, 2015 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataEight dyads were excluded for not watching the entirety of the initial intervention module video set, resulting in a total sample of 86 dyads for the quantitative assessment.
“Eight dyads were excluded for not watching the entirety of the initial intervention module video set, resulting in a total sample of 86 dyads for the quantitative assessment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationERN amplitude at age 6 positively predicts risk for anxiety disorder onset by age 9.
“For example, ERN amplitude at age 6 positively predicts risk for anxiety disorder onset by age 9 (Meyer et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Meyer et al., 2015 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPublished recommendations for preventive interventions for perfectionism include adoption of a positive psychology focus; rationale provision and discussion of risk; targeting maladaptive perfectionistic beliefs; providing cognitive reappraisal strategies; promoting a growth mindset, self-acceptance, and self-compassion; and parental engagement, including reducing criticism, modeling calmresponses
“Published recommendations for preventive interventions for perfectionism include adoption of a positive psychology focus; rationale provision and discussion of risk; targeting maladaptive perfectionistic beliefs; providing cognitive reappraisal strategies; promoting a growth mindset, selfacceptance, and self-compassion; and parental engagement, including reducing criticism, modeling calm responses”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Flett & Hewitt, 2014 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAIM and IAM measures were added during data collection, and thus ns differ by variable accordingly.
“Notably, AIM and IAM measures were added during data collection, and thus ns differ by variable accordingly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationError sensitivity overlaps substantially with the domain of concern over mistakes in Frost's multidimensional model of perfectionism and is a core feature of maladaptive perfectionism.
“Error sensitivity overlaps substantially with the domain of concern over mistakes in Frost's multidimensional model of perfectionism (Frost et al., 1990) and has been shown to be a core feature of maladaptive perfectionism (Tozzi et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataRecruitment targets were set based on data saturation, wherein few or no novel concepts were being shared by participants.
“Recruitment targets were set based on data saturation, wherein few or no novel concepts were being shared by participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThis study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Florida State University.
“This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Florida State University.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenWe included both parent and child perspectives, seldom done in qualitative clinical research.
“Additionally, we included both parent and child perspectives, seldom done in qualitative clinical research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenConvergence of qualitative and quantitative data enhances confidence in the findings on perceived appropriateness and acceptability.
“First, the use of mixed methods with heterogenous perspectives represented among interviewees allowed for both breadth and depth of understanding; moreover, convergence of qualitative and quantitative data enhances confidence in the findings on perceived appropriateness and acceptability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis finding supports the importance of emphasizing parent-based approaches in reducing error sensitivity with very young children.
“This finding supports the importance of emphasizing parent-based approaches in reducing error sensitivity with very young children.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThis type of program could be delivered alongside medical interventions targeting disorders of development or pediatric health conditions (e.g., childhood obesity) to mitigate potential emotional or behavioral comorbidities, including disordered eating or anxiety.
“For example, this type of program could be delivered alongside medical interventions targeting disorders of development or pediatric health conditions (e.g., childhood obesity) to mitigate potential emotional or behavioral comorbidities, including disordered eating or anxiety.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataThese strategies could be prescribed by those who work with families (pediatricians, teachers, child therapists) across contexts.
“Moreover, our study shows that parenting strategies targeting error sensitivity, as well as child-focused strategies, are perceived favorably by a wide range of parents, and thus these strategies could be prescribed by those who work with families (pediatricians, teachers, child therapists) across contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataA subset of interviews was double coded by two authors to build coding consensus.
“Codes were then refined according to input from all authors, and a subset of interviews was double coded by two authors (SC, AM) to build coding consensus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationOptimization and proliferation of low-intensity, digital health preventive programs that target transdiagnostic mechanisms (e.g., error sensitivity) could answer calls to provide disadvantaged caregivers with easily accessible tools to manage child behavioral problems and support healthy child emotional development.
“Optimization and proliferation of low-intensity, digital health preventive programs that target transdiagnostic mechanisms (e.g., error sensitivity) could answer calls to provide disadvantaged caregivers with easily accessible tools to manage child behavioral problems and support healthy child emotional development (Cobb, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cobb, 2023 source
The paper relies on this without support.
Longitudinal health trajectories associated with childhood perfectionism are unknown.
“Longitudinal health trajectories associated with childhood perfectionism are unknown.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There have been no qualitative investigations of interventions for perfectionism, nor evaluations of implementation outcomes of digital-health programs for children younger than the age of 7.
“Likewise, to our knowledge, there have been no qualitative investigations of interventions for perfectionism, nor evaluations of implementation outcomes of digital-health programs for children younger than the age of 7.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Error sensitivity is a risk factor for anxiety in 5-7-year-old children.
“targeting risk for anxiety (i.e., error sensitivity) in 5-7-year-old children and their parents”
The paper relies on this without support.
The quantitative acceptability and appropriateness measures validly assess these constructs in parents and children.
“All quantitative measures of acceptability for both parents and children indicated positive ratings of perceived acceptability.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Reported AIM and IAM minima cannot come from the stated scoring method
MinorThe paper says each measure averages four responses on a five-point scale. Such scores must occur in increments of 0.25; even if an item were missing and the remaining responses averaged, neither reported minimum-2.30 for AIM or 2.28 for IAM-is attainable.
“| Acceptability of | 4.17 | 0.59 | 2.30-5.00 | .97 | | Intervention Measure | | | | | | (AIM) | | | | | | Intervention | 4.13 | 0.56 | 2.28-5.00 | .96 |”
“These 4-item measures are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 ¼ Completely disagree, 2 ¼ Disagree, 3 ¼ Neither agree nor disagree, 4 ¼ Agree, 5 ¼ Completely agree) and show good psychometric properties.”
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
Robinson, P. M. (2007) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x · Cited by 23,297 · see citing works
Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (1988) · Cited by 20,701 · see citing works
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y · Cited by 12,038 · see citing works
Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects
Shenton, A. K. (2004) · Education for Information · doi:10.3233/efi-2004-22201 · Cited by 9,748 · see citing works
Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 · Cited by 8,721 · see citing works
Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data
Pope, C. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114 · Cited by 8,131 · see citing works
Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries
Guba, E. G. (1981) · ECTJ · doi:10.1007/bf02766777 · Cited by 5,527 · see citing works
Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines
Malterud, K. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05627-6 · Cited by 5,014 · see citing works
The dimensions of perfectionism
Frost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01172967 · Cited by 4,279 · see citing works
Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M., & Francis, J. J. (2017) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8 · Cited by 3,938 · see citing works
Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures
Weiner, B. J., Lewis, C. C., Stanick, C., Powell, B. J., Dorsey, C. N., Clary, A. S., Boynton, M. H., & Halko, H. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3 · Cited by 2,819 · see citing works
Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry
Morse, J. M. (2015) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732315588501 · Cited by 2,809 · see citing works
Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4 · Cited by 1,894 · see citing works
How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes
Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2017) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x16639015 · Cited by 1,752 · see citing works
Dissemination and Implementation Research in HealthTranslating Science to Practice
Brownson, R. C., Colditz, G. A., & Proctor, E. K. (2012) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199751877.001.0001 · Cited by 1,355 · see citing works
Mixed method designs in implementation research
Palinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., Horwitz, S., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M., & Landsverk, J. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0314-z · Cited by 1,187 · see citing works
Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research
Novins, D. K. (1995) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199503000-00028 · Cited by 1,085 · see citing works
Hollis, C., Falconer, C. J., Martin, J. L., Whittington, C., Stockton, S., Glazebrook, C., & Davies, E. B. (2017) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12663 · Cited by 846 · see citing works
Perfectionism in children and their parents: A developmental analysis.
Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., Oliver, J. M., & Macdonald, S. (2002) · Perfectionism: Theory, research, and treatment. · doi:10.1037/10458-004 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Liverpool, S., Mota, C. P., Sales, C. M. D., Čuš, A., Carletto, S., Hancheva, C., Sousa, S., Cerón, S. C., Moreno-Peral, P., Pietrabissa, G., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16317 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Perfectionism, Health, and Well-Being
Sirois, F. M., & Molnar, D. S. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18582-8 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Bergin, A. D., Vallejos, E. P., Davies, E. B., Daley, D., Ford, T., Harold, G., Hetrick, S., Kidner, M., Long, Y., Merry, S., et al. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00339-7 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Meyer, A., Hajcak, G., Torpey-Newman, D. C., Kujawa, A., & Klein, D. N. (2015) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000044 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Self-citationFlett, G. L., & Hewitt, P. L. (2014) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.21792 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
The structure of perfectionism: A twin study
Tozzi, F., Aggen, S. H., Neale, B. M., Anderson, C. B., Mazzeo, S. E., Neale, M. C., & Bulik, C. M. (2004) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1023/b:bege.0000038486.47219.76 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
The role of treatment acceptability in the initiation of treatment for ADHD
Krain, A. L., Kendall, P. C., & Power, T. J. (2005) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/1087054705279996 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Howard, S. J., & Williams, K. E. (2018) · Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/dbp.0000000000000578 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Shu, C. Y., Watson, H. J., Anderson, R. A., Wade, T. D., Kane, R. T., & Egan, S. J. (2019) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2019.103429 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Nehmy, T. J., & Wade, T. D. (2015) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2015.02.007 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Disorders of Sex Development/Intersex: Gaps in Psychosocial Care for Children
Ernst, M. M., Liao, L., Baratz, A. B., et al. (2018) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2017-4045 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Smith, M. M., Hewitt, P. L., Sherry, S. B., Flett, G. L., & Ray, C. (2022) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104180 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Piloting a perfectionism intervention for pre-adolescent children
Fairweather-Schmidt, A. K., & Wade, T. D. (2015) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2015.07.004 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Chong, L. J., & Meyer, A. M. (2018) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565641.2018.1528264 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationLewis, E. M., Feely, M., Seay, K. D., Fedoravicis, N., & Kohl, P. L. (2016) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-016-0526-2 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationRandall, E. T., Smith, K. R., Kronman, C. A., Conroy, C., Smith, A., & Simons, L. E. (2017) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2017.11.012 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Meyer, A. (2022) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14050 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationMitchell, J. H., Broeren, S., Newall, C., & Hudson, J. L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.12.006 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Molnar, D. S., Sirois, F. M., Flett, G. L., & Sadava, S. (2020) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282919877754 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Personalizing youth psychotherapy: A scoping review of decision-making in modular treatments
Venturo-Conerly, K. E., Reynolds, R., Clark, M., Fitzpatrick, O. M., & Weisz, J. R. (2023) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1037/cps0000130 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Understanding the implementation of the parenting program: Findings from a mixed methods pilot study
Czymoniewicz-Klippel, M. T., Chesnut, R. P., DiNallo, J. M., & Perkins, D. F. (2017) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.09.016 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Hickey, G., McGilloway, S., Leckey, Y., Stokes, A., Bywater, T., & Donnelly, M. (2021) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-020-01170-y · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Lewis, E. M., Murugan, V., Williams, K. A., Barth, R. P., & Lee, B. R. (2022) · Child & Family Social Work · doi:10.1111/cfs.12908 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationDesign and Analysis in Dissemination and Implementation Research
Landsverk, J., Brown, C. H., Smith, J. D., Chamberlain, P., Curran, G. M., Palinkas, L., Ogihara, M., Czaja, S., Goldhaber-Fiebert, J. D., Vermeer, W., et al. (2017) · Oxford Scholarship Online · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190683214.003.0013 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Randall, E. T., Gray, L. S., & Fletcher, A. A. (2018) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsx106 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Lewis, E. M., Hooley, C., Feely, M., Lanier, P., Korff, S. J., & Kohl, P. L. (2018) · Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders · doi:10.1177/1063426618806253 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationMeyer, A., Chong, L., Wissemann, K., Mehra, L., & Mirzadegan, I. (2023) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2023.01.005 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationMental health and disadvantaged youth: Empowering parents as interventionists through technology
Cobb, C. L. (2023) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0001156 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
McGar, A. B., Kindler, C., & Marsac, M. (2019) · JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting · doi:10.2196/12427 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Liverpool, S., & Edbrooke-Childs, J. H. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/25235 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Leckey, Y., Stokes, A., Hickey, G., & McGilloway, S. (2022) · Clinical Social Work Journal · doi:10.1007/s10615-021-00789-w · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Trait Perfectionism and Psychosocial Outcomes in Adolescents With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Piercy, J. C., Stinson, J., Church, P. C., Walters, T. D., Frost, K., & Kohut, S. A. (2019) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000002586 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The Role of Perfectionistic Self-Presentation in Pediatric Pain
Sánchez‐Rodríguez, E., Ferreira-Valente, A., Pathak, A., Solé, E., Sharma, S., Jensen, M. P., & Miró, J. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18020591 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
(2018) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781529716665.n5 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Mirzadegan, Perceived acceptability, appropriateness, and participation fidelity in a web-based intervention for error sensitivity in 5-7-year-olds: A mixed-methods evaluation (Publication No. 30526045) [Doctoral dissertation,
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Psihogios, A. M., & Stiles‐Shields, C. (2024) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsae094 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Chew, J., Frings, D., Reavey, P., & Allabyrne, C. (2026) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251406323 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“15,17,42,43,49,69 For instance, a recent study 70 revealed that both children and parents/guardians found a DMHI developed to reduce negative over-reactions to making mistakes (a risk factor for anxiety) in children between 5 and 7 years old, which provided independently delivered child and parent…”
Mirzadegan, I. A., Lewis, E. M., Cole, S. L., & Meyer, A. M. (2026) · JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting · doi:10.2196/79898 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“This study relied on a codebook generated for a prior study, and data preprocessing is described else-where in further detail [45].”
Self-citationCong, Q. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1752831 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Commentary: A perfectly imperfect approach to reducing risk for pediatric anxiety
Hamilton, A. L., & Kidwell, K. M. (2024) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsae074 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Mirzadegan, I. A., Lewis, E. M., Cole, S. L., & Meyer, A. M. (2025) · doi:10.2196/preprints.79898
Self-citationA Scoping Review of Digital Interventions Targeting Anxiety in Young Children
Coverdale, G., Perry, Y., Magiati, I., Badcock, N. A., Bollig, B., & Alvares, G. A. (2025) · Child & Youth Care Forum · doi:10.1007/s10566-025-09899-9 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“By contrast, module-based asynchronous interventions (57.1%, n = 8) were mostly directed at parents (71.4%, n = 5), with three engaging children with varying degrees of parental support (Fortier et al., 2015 ; Mirzadegan et al., 2025 ; Wright et al., 2017).”
InfluentialPayne, A. M., Schmidt, N. B., Meyer, A. M., & Hajcak, G. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2026.122125
Self-citationNantwi, S., & O’Connor, S. (2026) · The Journal of School Nursing · doi:10.1177/10598405261473648 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mirzadegan, I. A., Lewis, E. M., Cole, S. L., & Meyer, A.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Santa Clara University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mirzadegan, Isaac A
- Venue
- Journal of Pediatric Psychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2024-06-10
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-17
- ISSN
- 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-735X
- PMC
- PMC11753869
- OpenAlex
- W4399480363
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health
- NIMH (K01MH117366)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- digital mental health, online intervention, anxiety risk, perfectionism, error sensitivity, young children, parent-child dyads, parent-based intervention, cognitive-behavioral intervention, perceived acceptability, program appropriateness
- MeSH terms
- Internet-Based Intervention, Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review