Cited by 15Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationClinical practice guidelines implementation

“Putting meat on the bones”: Understanding the implementation of a community-based early intervention and prevention programme—contextual, person, and programme influences

Open access
Hickey, Gráinne, McGilloway, Sinead, Leckey, Yvonne, Stokes, Ann, Bywater, Tracey, Donnelly, Michael·2021·Prevention Science

Abstract

The adoption and effective delivery of evidence-based interventions within "real-world" community-based, primary health care service settings are of crucial importance. In this paper, we explore the successes and challenges of implementing a new complex, group-based, early parenting intervention called the Parent and Infant (PIN) programme. This study involved a systematic analysis of the processes and factors that influence the implementation of the PIN programme; the analysis was guided and informed by the Implementation Outcome Framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A documentary review, alongside a series of one-to-one interviews and small group discussions with a range of stakeholders (n = 44), and 7 focus groups (n = 24) were used as data sources. Factors that promoted programme adoption, acceptability, and implementation feasibility included programme characteristics and stakeholder attitudes, as well as organisational and systems factors (e.g. leadership and collaboration). Key challenges to implementation success included engagement and adoption barriers. This research provides a useful and important example of real-world, theory-driven implementation research which helped to identify interrelated processes, factors, and contexts which shape and influence the implementation of early intervention and prevention programmes, removed for blind review.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11121-020-01170-y

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [37]37. Metz, A. (2013). Implementation science: defining the new frontier. In T. Halle, A. Metz, & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Applying implementation science in early childhood programs and systems (pp. 1-4). Baltimore: Paul Brooks.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hickey, G., McGilloway, S., Leckey, Y., Stokes, A., Bywater, T., & Donnelly, M.
Affiliations
  • National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE)
  • University of York (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Hickey, Gráinne
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2020-10-15
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
113-129
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W3093469878
Cited by
15
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University) (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Health Research Board (CARG/2012/2017)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
implementation research, community-based primary care, implementation barriers, stakeholder engagement, organizational factors, group intervention, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
MeSH terms
Humans, Parents, Primary Health Care, Primary Prevention, Parenting, Focus Groups, Early Intervention, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review