Cited by 217Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesDigital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Online psychological treatment for pediatric recurrent pain: A randomized evaluation

Hicks, Carrie L., von Baeyer, Carl L., McGrath, Patrick J.·2006·Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a distance treatment delivered through Internet and telephone for pediatric recurrent pain. METHODS: Forty-seven participants (9-16 years of age) were randomly assigned to either an Internet-based treatment or a standard medical care waitlist. Treatment employed a Web-based manual for children and parents with weekly therapist contact by telephone or e-mail. At 1- and 3-month follow-ups, participants were assessed on the outcome variables of pain and quality of life. A 50% reduction in diary pain scores was considered clinically significant. RESULTS: Significant between-group differences were found: 71 and 72% of the treatment group achieved clinically significant improvement at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups, respectively, whereas only 19 and 14% of the control group achieved the criterion. No significant differences were found on the quality of life variable. CONCLUSIONS: Distance methods have considerable potential for making effective treatments more accessible with lower associated costs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jpepsy/jsj065

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings provide support for previous studies which demonstrated the efficacy of self-help type interventions with minimal therapist contact, for children with chronic headache and recurrent pain.

    “they provide support for previous studies which demonstrated the efficacy of self-help type interventions with minimal therapist contact, for children with chronic headache and recurrent pain 22, 23 .”
  • These bodily changes from relaxation have been found to reduce the experience of stress and anxiety.

    “These bodily changes have also been found to reduce the experience of stress and anxiety [74].”

    From Best-evidence for the rehabilitation of chronic pain part 1: Pediatric pain (2019) · cites this paper as [74]

    The Treatment Program describes relaxation and imagery techniques, and the Discussion reports reduced pain. Neither passage links bodily changes from relaxation to reduced stress or anxiety. Searches for relaxation, stress, anxiety, and physiological tension found no passage addressing that link. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Apley, J. (1975). The child with abdominal pains (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  2. Engstrom, I., & Lindquist, B. L. (1998). Gastrointestinal disorders. In R. Ammerman & J. Campo (Eds.), Handbook of pediatric psychology and psychiatry (pp. 206-223). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  3. Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivari- ate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hicks, C. L., von Baeyer, C. L., & McGrath, P. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Hicks, Carrie L.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Published
2006-08-01
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
724-736
ISSN
  • 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-735X
OpenAlex
W2122008385
Cited by
217
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • International Association for the Study of Pain
  • University of Saskatchewan
  • Canadian Pain Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
online therapy, telephone-delivered therapy, pain diary, quality of life, children and adolescents, treatment accessibility, cost reduction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Demography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Pain, Psychology, Quality of Life, Recurrence, Internet, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review