Cited by 30Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Cognitive behavioral therapy for pediatric chronic pain: The problem, research, and practice

Noel, Melanie, Petter, Mark, Parker, Jennifer A., Chambers, Christine T.·2012·Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to outline the rationale and use of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for the treatment of pediatric chronic pain. The article begins by demonstrating the scope and impact of the problem of pediatric chronic pain. It then provides an overview of the framework of CBT for pediatric chronic pain and standard treatment components are outlined. A summary of the current state of research and its efficacy is provided. The article concludes by presenting outcome data from a specific example of a CBT group for pediatric recurrent abdominal pain. Future directions for research in this area are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/0889-8391.26.2.143

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 6-session CBT group facilitated reductions in pediatric abdominal pain, improved parent confidence to empower their children to use pain coping skills, and increased adaptive behavioral responses among parents themselves.

    “A 6-session CBT group facilitated reductions in pediatric abdominal pain, improved parent confidence to empower their children to use pain coping skills, and increased adaptive behavioral responses among parents themselves [8].”
  • Previous studies have included 6 group CBT sessions, 8 individual ACT sessions, and 14 youth and 4 parent group ACT sessions.

    “Previous studies have included 6 group CBT sessions [8], 8 individual ACT sessions [9], and 14 youth and 4 parent group ACT sessions [10].”
  • Noel et al. did not address impact of families meeting as a group.

    “Similarly, youth and parent groups met briefly at the end of sessions to review materials, but Noel et al. [8] did not address impact of families meeting as a group.”

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noel, M., Petter, M., Parker, J. A., & Chambers, C. T.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre (CA)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2012
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
143-156
ISSN
  • 0889-8391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-887X
OpenAlex
W2086052995
Cited by
30
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, pediatric chronic pain, recurrent abdominal pain, treatment efficacy, pediatric pain management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review