Cited by 76SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine protection against variants of concern after one versus two doses

Open access
Abu-Raddad, Laith J, Chemaitelly, Hiam, Yassine, Hadi M, Benslimane, Fatiha M, Al Khatib, Hebah A, Tang, Patrick, Malek, Joel A, Coyle, Peter +15 more·2021·Journal of Travel Medicine

Abstract

Strategies for rolling out vaccination against Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) varied across countries. A key question is whether delaying administration of the second vaccine dose to vaccinate the largest number of people in the shortest time, in situations of limited vaccine supplies and high incidence, could avert more disease cases, hospitalizations and deaths than the current protocol of a second dose shortly after the first dose. The messenger RNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) effectiveness against infection and against disease in the weeks following the first dose. Error bars indicate the 95% confidence intervals for vaccine effectiveness estimates. The messenger RNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) effectiveness against infection and against disease in the weeks following vaccination with the first dose aVaccine effectiveness was estimated using the test-negative, case–control study design.2 Cases and controls were matched one-to-one by age, sex, nationality, and reason for PCR testing. Vaccine effectiveness is given by2 |$\mathrm{Vaccine}\ \mathrm{effectiveness}=1-\frac{\mathrm{vaccinated}\ \mathrm{among}\ \mathrm{cases}\times \mathrm{unvaccinated}\ \mathrm{among}\ \mathrm{controls}}{\mathrm{vaccinated}\ \mathrm{among}\ \mathrm{controls}\times \mathrm{unvaccinated}\ \mathrm{among}\ \mathrm{cases}}$|⁠. bAny B.1.1.7 PCR-confirmed infection. A B.1.1.7 infection is proxied as an S-gene ‘target failure’ case using the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kit platform (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), applying the criterion of PCR cycle threshold value ≤ 30 for both the N and ORF1ab genes, but a negative outcome for the S-gene. The median date of vaccination was March 1 2021 for the cases and February 28 2021 for their matched controls. cAny B.1.351 PCR-confirmed infection. With only B.1.351 and B.1.1.7 cases identified in the viral genome sequencing after 7 March 2021, a B.1.351 infection is proxied as the complement of the B.1.1.7 criterion, that is any infection with a Ct value ≤ 30 for the N, ORF1ab and S genes between March 8 and 31 2021. The median date of vaccination was March 7 2021 for the cases and March 1 2021 for their matched controls. dAny B.1.1.7 PCR-confirmed infection that led to severe, critical or fatal disease. Severe disease, critical disease and COVID-19 death were defined based on the World Health Organization criteria for classifying SARS-CoV-2 infection severity3 and COVID-19-related death.4 eAny B.1.351 PCR-confirmed infection that led to severe, critical or fatal disease. Severe disease, critical disease and COVID-19 death were defined based on the World Health Organization criteria for classifying SARS-CoV-2 infection severity3 and COVID-19-related death.4 fAny PCR-confirmed infection that led to severe, critical or fatal disease. With the dominance of both B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants during the study period, this effectiveness is a combined measure against both of these variants. Severe disease, critical disease and COVID-19 death were defined based on the World Health Organization criteria for classifying SARS-CoV-2 infection severity3 and COVID-19-related death.4 BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine effectiveness against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Qatar was recently reported with focus on individuals who completed 14 days after the second dose.1 Here, we provide a follow-up analysis of how vaccine protection develops week-by-week after the first dose. Data for SARS-CoV-2 were extracted from Qatar’s nationwide digital-health information platform. The platform hosts the national centralized SARS-CoV-2 databases that captured all vaccination records, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, and COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths since epidemic start.1 The study was conducted from 1 February to 31 March 2021, the period of rapid mass vaccination scale-up. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated using the test-negative case–control study design.2 Cases and controls were matched one-to-one by age, sex, nationality and reason for PCR testing. Effectiveness was estimated against documented infection with the B.1.1.7 or B.1.351 variants, as well as against severe, critical or fatal disease due to any SARS-CoV-2 infection. Classification of COVID-19 case severity (acute-care hospitalizations),3 criticality (ICU hospitalizations)3 and fatality4 followed the World Health Organization guidelines. Further details on study methods can be found in our previous publication.1 Between 1 February and 31 March 2021, 333 764 individuals received at least one BNT162b2 vaccine dose, of whom 250 619 completed two doses. Two-thirds (60.8%) of those vaccinated were men, and the median age was 40 years. Median time elapsed between the first and second doses was 21 days, and 98.4% of individuals received their second dose ≤ 25 days after the first dose. Effectiveness against infection with B.1.1.7 or B.1.351 was negligible for 2 weeks after the first dose (Figure 1). E

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jtm/taab083

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Matching on sex, age, nationality, and calendar week was previously shown to adequately control for differences in SARS-CoV-2 exposure risk in Qatar.

    “Matching according to these factors was previously shown to provide adequate control of differences in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in studies of different designs, all of which involved control groups, such as test-negative, case–control studies.”
  • Matching was not possible for coexisting conditions, but matching on sex, age, and nationality provided demonstrable control of bias in earlier studies.

    “Although matching was performed according to sex, age, and nationality, matching was not possible for other factors, such as coexisting conditions. However, matching according to these factors provided demonstrable control of bias in our earlier studies.11,12,15,21,22”
  • Matching by sex, age, and nationality provided demonstrable control of bias in studies of different epidemiologic designs that used control groups in Qatar.

    “However, matching by these factors provided demonstrable control of bias in studies of different epidemiologic designs and that used control groups in Qatar13,14,35–37.”
  • The low effectiveness of BNT162b2 against Delta could be due to measurement several months after the second dose, whereas Beta effectiveness was measured shortly after vaccination.

    “The effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine against the Beta variant was measured shortly after the population of Qatar had been vaccinated, whereas the effectiveness of BNT162b2 against the Delta variant was conducted several months after the second dose, which could be one of the reasons for low effectiveness of BNT162b2 against the Delta variant.404,405”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [404]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abu-Raddad, L. J., Chemaitelly, H., Yassine, H. M., Benslimane, F. M., Al Khatib, H. A., Tang, P., Malek, J. A., Coyle, P., Ayoub, H. H., Al Kanaani, Z., Al Kuwari, E., Jeremijenko, A., Kaleeckal, A. H., Latif, A. N., Shaik, R. M., Abdul Rahim, H. F., Nasrallah, G. K., Al Kuwari, M. G., Al Romaihi, H. E., Al-Thani, M. H., Al Khal, A., Butt, A. A., & Bertollini, R.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Qatar University (QA)
  • Biomedical Research Center, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
  • Sidra Medical and Research Center (QA)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
  • Hamad Medical Corporation (QA)
  • College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
  • Primary Health Care Corporation, Doha, Qatar
  • Ministry of Public Health, Doha, Qatar
  • Ministry of Public Health (QA)
Corresponding author
Abu-Raddad, Laith J
Venue
Journal of Travel Medicine
Published
2021-05-28
Volume
28
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 1195-1982 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-8305
OpenAlex
W3164094536
Cited by
76
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 14
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Travel Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Qatar Foundation
  • Ministry of Public Health
  • Weill Cornell
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
BNT162b2, mRNA vaccines, COVID-19 vaccines, SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, Alpha variant, Beta variant, vaccine effectiveness, second dose timing, test-negative case-control, S-gene target failure, hospitalization, limited vaccine supply, SARS-CoV-2 genome
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, BNT162 Vaccine, Humans, RNA, Messenger

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review