Cited by 450SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in Qatar

Open access
Tang, Patrick, Hasan, Mohammad R., Chemaitelly, Hiam, Yassine, Hadi M., Benslimane, Fatiha M., Al Khatib, Hebah A., AlMukdad, Sawsan, Coyle, Peter +16 more·2021·Nature Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

With the global expansion of the highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 Delta (B.1.617.2) variant, we conducted a matched test-negative case-control study to assess the real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 messenger RNA vaccines against infection with Delta in Qatar's population. BNT162b2 effectiveness against any, symptomatic or asymptomatic, Delta infection was 45.3% (95% CI, 22.0-61.6%) ≥14 d after the first vaccine dose, but only 51.9% (95% CI, 47.0-56.4%) ≥14 d after the second dose, with 50% of fully vaccinated individuals receiving their second dose before 11 May 2021. Corresponding mRNA-1273 effectiveness ≥14 d after the first or second dose was 73.7% (95% CI, 58.1-83.5%) and 73.1% (95% CI, 67.5-77.8%), respectively. Notably, effectiveness against Delta-induced severe, critical or fatal disease was 93.4% (95% CI, 85.4-97.0%) for BNT162b2 and 96.1% (95% CI, 71.6-99.5%) for mRNA-1273 ≥ 14 d after the second dose. Our findings show robust effectiveness for both BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 in preventing Delta hospitalization and death in Qatar's population, despite lower effectiveness in preventing infection, particularly for the BNT162b2 vaccine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-021-01583-4

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Real-world studies performed a few months into COVID-19 vaccination campaigns showed high effectiveness of these vaccines.

    “Real-world setting studies performed, few months into vaccination campaigns, showed high effectiveness of these vaccines [1-8].”

    From Vaccine effectiveness and duration of protection of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines against Delta and Omicron BA.1 symptomatic and severe COVID-19 outcomes in adults aged 50 years and over in France (2023) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports robust effectiveness of both vaccines against Delta-related hospitalization and death. It also reports only 53.5% effectiveness for BNT162b2 against any Delta infection after two doses, so the unqualified claim of high effectiveness overstates this study's findings. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Real-world data from Qatar indicated that the BNT162b2 vaccine had 51.9% effectiveness against the Delta variant, significantly lower than 75.0% against Beta and 89.5% against Alpha.

    “Real-world data from Qatar indicated that the BNT162b2 vaccine had only 51.9% effectiveness against the Delta variant, which was significantly lower compared to 75.0% and 89.5% effectiveness conferred by the vaccine against Beta and Alpha variants, respectively.102”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [102]

  • Real-world data showed mRNA-1273 effectiveness against Alpha was 100%, against Beta 96.4%, and against Delta 73.1%.

    “Real-world data showed that effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against Alpha and Beta variants was 100% and 96.4%, respectively,417,418 whereas effectiveness against Delta was slightly lower (73.1%).102”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [102]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Israel, A., et al. Elapsed time since BNT162b2 vaccine and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large cohort. medRxiv, 2021.2008.2003.21261496 (2021).
  2. Thomas, S.J., et al. Six Month Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine. medRxiv, 2021.2007.2028.21261159 (2021).
  3. Rothman, K.J., Greenland, S. & Lash, T.L. Modern epidemiology, (Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2008).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, P., Hasan, M. R., Chemaitelly, H., Yassine, H. M., Benslimane, F. M., Al Khatib, H. A., AlMukdad, S., Coyle, P., Ayoub, H. H., Al Kanaani, Z., Al Kuwari, E., Jeremijenko, A., Kaleeckal, A. H., Latif, A. N., Shaik, R. M., Abdul Rahim, H. F., Nasrallah, G. K., Al Kuwari, M. G., Al Romaihi, H. E., Butt, A. A., Al-Thani, M. H., Al Khal, A., Bertollini, R., & Abu-Raddad, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Sidra Medical and Research Center (QA)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Qatar University (QA)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Hamad Medical Corporation (QA)
  • Ministry of Public Health (QA)
Corresponding author
Abu-Raddad, Laith J.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2021-11-02
Volume
27
Issue
12
Pages
2136-2143
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W3210921815
Cited by
450
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 251 · 2021: 44 · 2013: 1
FWCI
32.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Biomedical Research Program and the Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Biomathematics Research Core, both at Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar
  • Hamad Medical Corporation
  • Ministry of Public Health Qatar
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, COVID-19 vaccines, Delta variant, vaccine effectiveness, real-world effectiveness, asymptomatic infection, symptomatic infection, hospitalization prevention, mortality prevention, test-negative case-control, Qatar
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Vaccine Efficacy, BNT162 Vaccine, 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273, Breakthrough Infections, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Qatar, Severity of Illness Index, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review