Cited by 63Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

Community case management for former jail inmates: Its impacts on rearrest, drug use, and HIV risk

Open access
Needels, K.·2005·Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine

Abstract

Dramatically increasing incarceration rates in the United States have led to large concentrations of formerly imprisoned people in poverty-stricken urban areas. Therefore, identifying ways to help inmates who exhibit multiple, serious problems and who are at great risk of experiencing poor postrelease outcomes is especially important to urban communities, as well as to service providers and policymakers concerned about these communities. Our research provides evidence about the effectiveness of one strategy, called Health Link, which recruited adult women and adolescent men while they were incarcerated in a New York City jail and offered case management services during the especially challenging first year after release. About 1,400 participants who enrolled during a 3-year period were randomly assigned either to a group that was eligible for intensive discharge planning services and community-based case management services or to a group eligible for less-intensive discharge planning and no community-based services. We investigated whether the availability of these services reduced rates of drug use, HIV risk, and rearrest. Using data from interviews and hair analysis to measure impacts during a 1-year follow-up period after clients' release from jail, we detected increased participation in drug treatment programs and weak evidence for reduced drug use. However, we did not observe reductions in rearrest rates or in activities with high risk of HIV infection. We conclude that a well-executed case management program can make modest differences in a few short-term outcomes of former inmates. However, the intervention did not lead to the hoped-for changes across a range of outcomes that would clearly indicate greater success in community reintegration or improved health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jurban/jti092

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research and other studies suggest that interventions while individuals are in jail or in the days and weeks after release have the potential to be cost-effective, achieve high retention rates, and protect adolescents from returning to drug use, crime, or HIV risk behavior.

    “Our previous research [13,14,15], as well as other studies [16,17], suggest that interventions while individuals are in jail – or in the days and weeks after they are released – have the potential to be cost-effective, achieve high retention rates, and protect adolescents from returning to drug use, crime, or HIV risk behavior.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rhodes W, Smith C. Bias in Self-Reporting by Birth Cohorts Over Time as Reflected in the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, Inc; 1993. Working Paper.
  2. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Workshop Summary: Scientific Evidence on Condom Effectiveness for Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Prevention, June 12-13, 2000, Herndon, Virginia. 2001.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Needels, K.
Affiliations
Mathematica Policy Research (US)
Corresponding author
Needels, K.
Venue
Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
Published
2005-07-06
Volume
82
Issue
3
Pages
420-433
ISSN
  • 0028-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-3460
  • 1468-2869
OpenAlex
W2038492252
Cited by
63
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
17.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Urban Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
community case management, post-release outcomes, rearrest, drug use, HIV risk, discharge planning, incarceration, urban poverty, community reintegration, hair analysis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Community Health Services, Female, Humans, Male, Poverty Areas, Prisons, Risk-Taking, United States, Urban Health, Urban Population, Health Behavior, HIV Infections, Case Management, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review