Community case management for former jail inmates: Its impacts on rearrest, drug use, and HIV risk
Open accessAbstract
Dramatically increasing incarceration rates in the United States have led to large concentrations of formerly imprisoned people in poverty-stricken urban areas. Therefore, identifying ways to help inmates who exhibit multiple, serious problems and who are at great risk of experiencing poor postrelease outcomes is especially important to urban communities, as well as to service providers and policymakers concerned about these communities. Our research provides evidence about the effectiveness of one strategy, called Health Link, which recruited adult women and adolescent men while they were incarcerated in a New York City jail and offered case management services during the especially challenging first year after release. About 1,400 participants who enrolled during a 3-year period were randomly assigned either to a group that was eligible for intensive discharge planning services and community-based case management services or to a group eligible for less-intensive discharge planning and no community-based services. We investigated whether the availability of these services reduced rates of drug use, HIV risk, and rearrest. Using data from interviews and hair analysis to measure impacts during a 1-year follow-up period after clients' release from jail, we detected increased participation in drug treatment programs and weak evidence for reduced drug use. However, we did not observe reductions in rearrest rates or in activities with high risk of HIV infection. We conclude that a well-executed case management program can make modest differences in a few short-term outcomes of former inmates. However, the intervention did not lead to the hoped-for changes across a range of outcomes that would clearly indicate greater success in community reintegration or improved health.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research and other studies suggest that interventions while individuals are in jail or in the days and weeks after release have the potential to be cost-effective, achieve high retention rates, and protect adolescents from returning to drug use, crime, or HIV risk behavior.
“Our previous research [13,14,15], as well as other studies [16,17], suggest that interventions while individuals are in jail – or in the days and weeks after they are released – have the potential to be cost-effective, achieve high retention rates, and protect adolescents from returning to drug use, crime, or HIV risk behavior.”
From Reducing drug use, human immunodeficiency virus risk, and recidivism among young men leaving jail: Evaluation of the REAL MEN re-entry program (2010) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42sup-0669 · Cited by 833 · see citing works
Freudenberg, N. (2001) · Journal of urban health · doi:10.1093/jurban/78.2.214 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics, 1979
Strange, M. (1981) · Government Publications Review Part A · doi:10.1016/0196-335x(81)90128-x · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Incarceration and the Community: The Problem of Removing and Returning Offenders
Clear, T. R., Rose, D. R., & Ryder, J. A. (2001) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0011128701047003003 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Rawson, R. A., Huber, A., McCann, M., SHOPTAW, S. J., Farabee, D. J., Reiber, C., & Ling, W. W. (2002) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.59.9.817 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37sup-681 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Pharmacological treatment of cocaine dependence: a systematic review
de Lima, M. S., Soares, B. G. D. O., Reisser, A. A. L., & Farrell, M. (2002) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00209.x · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Adverse effects of US jail and prison policies on the health and well-being of women of color.
Freudenberg, N. (2002) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.92.12.1895 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Reintegrating women leaving jail into urban communities: a description of a model program
Richie, B. E. (2001) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jurban/78.2.290 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Josi, D. A., & Sechrest, D. K. (1999) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418829900094051 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
An expensive policy: the impact of inadequate funding for substance abuse treatment.
Amaro, H. D. L. A. (1999) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.89.5.657 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Case Management Outcomes for Drug-Involved Offenders
Martin, S. S., & Inciardi, J. A. (1997) · The Prison Journal · doi:10.1177/0032855597077002004 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The Nokomis Challenge Program Evaluation
Deschenes, E. P., Greenwood, P. W., & Marshall, G. N. (1996) · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Effects of Case Management on Drug Users' Risky Sex
Longshore, D. L., Turner, S. F., & Anglin, M. D. (1998) · The Prison Journal · doi:10.1177/0032855598078001002 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Rhodes W, Smith C. Bias in Self-Reporting by Birth Cohorts Over Time as Reflected in the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, Inc; 1993. Working Paper.
- US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Workshop Summary: Scientific Evidence on Condom Effectiveness for Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Prevention, June 12-13, 2000, Herndon, Virginia. 2001.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Freudenberg, N., Moseley, J., Labriola, M., Daniels, J., & Murrill, C. (2007) · Public Health Reports® · doi:10.1177/003335490712200605 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Freudenberg, N., Ramaswamy, M., Daniels, J., Crum, M., Ompad, D. C., & Vlahov, D. (2010) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.01.008 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- Needels, K.
- Affiliations
- Mathematica Policy Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Needels, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
- Published
- 2005-07-06
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 420-433
- ISSN
- 0028-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-3460
- 1468-2869
- PMC
- PMC3456061
- OpenAlex
- W2038492252
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 17.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Urban Health (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
- Keywords
- community case management, post-release outcomes, rearrest, drug use, HIV risk, discharge planning, incarceration, urban poverty, community reintegration, hair analysis
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Community Health Services, Female, Humans, Male, Poverty Areas, Prisons, Risk-Taking, United States, Urban Health, Urban Population, Health Behavior, HIV Infections, Case Management, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review