Reducing drug use, human immunodeficiency virus risk, and recidivism among young men leaving jail: Evaluation of the REAL MEN re-entry program
Open accessAbstract
Purpose This study assesses the impact of REAL MEN (Returning Educated African-American and Latino Men to Enriched Neighborhoods), an intervention designed to reduce drug use, risky sexual behavior and criminal activity among 16-18-year-old males leaving New York City jails. Methods Participants (N = 552) were recruited in city jails and randomly assigned to receive an intensive 30-hour jail/community-based intervention or a single jail-based discharge planning session. All participants were also referred to optional services at a community-based organization (CBO). One year after release from jail, 397 (72%) participants completed a follow-up interview. Logistic and ordinary least squares regression was used to evaluate the impact of the intervention on drug use, risky sexual behavior, criminal justice involvement, and school/work involvement post release. Results Assignment to REAL MEN and, independently, use of CBO services, significantly reduced the odds of substance dependence (odds ratio [OR] = .52, p ≤ .05; OR = .41, p ≤ .05, respectively) 1 year after release. Those assigned to the intervention spent 29 fewer days in jail compared with the comparison group (p ≤ .05). Compared to non-CBO visitors, those who visited the CBO were more likely to have attended school or found work in the year after release (OR = 2.02, p ≤ .01). Conclusions Jail and community services reduced drug dependence 1 year after release and the number of days spent in jail after the index arrest. While these findings suggest that multifaceted interventions can improve outcomes for young men leaving jail, rates of drug use, risky sexual behavior, and recidivism remained high for all participants after release from jail, suggesting the need for additional policy and programmatic interventions.
Verified 2026-10-09 · 1 reference not checked yet
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
REAL MEN, a 30-hour jail-and-community reentry intervention for 16–18-year-old males leaving New York City jails, was evaluated in a randomized trial with 552 participants and 397 (72%) followed one year after release. Assignment to REAL MEN and/or use of community-based organization (CBO) services was associated with reduced substance dependence, fewer days in jail, and greater school/work involvement, though drug use, risky sex, and recidivism remained high overall.
Key findings
- Assignment to REAL MEN significantly reduced the odds of substance dependence one year after release (OR=.52, p≤.05); independently, at least one CBO visit also reduced substance dependence (OR=.41, p≤.05). For those attending four or more REAL MEN sessions, the effect was stronger (OR=.401, p≤.05).
- REAL MEN assignment reduced hard drug use after release (OR=.166, p≤.05), though only 5% of the sample reported such use in the 90 days before follow-up; it did not significantly affect daily marijuana smoking, reported by 32% at follow-up.
- Participants who used both REAL MEN and CBO services were one-third as likely to engage in sexual risk behaviors post-release (OR=.33, p≤.05), and CBO visitors were more than twice as likely to have been in school or worked for at least seven months after release (OR=2.02, p≤.01); those in both components had even higher constructive outcomes (OR=2.68, p≤.05).
- Among those incarcerated after the index incarceration, REAL MEN-assigned participants spent about 29 fewer days in jail (p≤.05); the paper estimates this could yield savings up to $7,308 per person based on a 2003 New York City jail cost of $252/day, while cautioning that days in jail were self-reported.
Methods
- Randomized trial: 552 male adolescents aged at least 16 but under 19 were recruited in New York City jails (2003–2007) and randomly assigned to a 30-hour jail/community psychosocial educational intervention or a single jail-based discharge planning session; all were referred to optional CBO services.
- Follow-up interviews were conducted approximately 12 months after release; 397 participants (72%) completed follow-up. Logistic regression tested outcomes in substance use, sexual risk, criminal justice, and school/work domains, and OLS regression examined days incarcerated.
- Analyses compared random assignment groups, participation in four or more REAL MEN sessions, any CBO visit, and mutually exclusive treatment combinations, controlling for baseline characteristics.
Limitations
- The paper states that it relies on self-reported drug and sexual behavior and self-reported days incarcerated, all subject to memory lapses and social biases; attrition may have biased results despite controls; the sample may differ on unmeasured dimensions and was recruited from one city, limiting generalizability; no participants identified as gay, bisexual, or transgender or reported sexual contact with other young men, so their needs are not addressed; and no cost-benefit analysis was conducted.
- Evident from the text: CBO participation was not randomly assigned and reflects self-selection, so CBO-related findings may be confounded by unmeasured differences between those who did and did not attend.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 16 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Participants who visited the CBO were more than twice as likely to have been either in school or have worked for at least seven months after release compared with those who did not seek CBO services (OR=2.02, p≤.01).
“Finally, participants who visited the CBO were more than twice as likely (OR=2.02, p≤.01) to have been either in school or have worked for at least seven months after release, compared to those who did not seek services from the CBO.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported measures of drug use, sexual behavior, and days incarcerated are sufficiently accurate to detect intervention effects despite memory lapses and social biases.
- Rests on an assumption: Attrition from the original sample did not bias results after controlling for identified variables.
- Rests on an assumption: CBO participation effects are not entirely due to self-selection.
- Findingown data
The offer of more intensive services and active outreach increased overall post-release CBO participation rates almost three-fold (45% vs. 17%, p≤.001).
“Thus, the offer of more intensive services and active outreach increased overall post-release participation rates almost three-fold (45% vs. 17%, p≤.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CBO participation effects are not entirely due to self-selection.
- Findingown data
The REAL MEN intervention did not have a significant effect on post-release daily marijuana smoking.
“However, the REAL MEN intervention did not have a significant effect on post-release daily marijuana smoking, reported by 32% of the sample in the follow-up interview.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported measures of drug use, sexual behavior, and days incarcerated are sufficiently accurate to detect intervention effects despite memory lapses and social biases.
- Rests on an assumption: Attrition from the original sample did not bias results after controlling for identified variables.
- Findingown data
Participants who participated in both REAL MEN and the CBO were one-third as likely to engage in sexual risk behaviors post-release as those who attended only REAL MEN sessions and did not visit the CBO (OR=.33, p≤.05).
“Those who participated in both were one-third as likely to engage in sexual risk behaviors (OR=.33, p≤.05) post-release as those who attended only REAL MEN sessions but did not visit the CBO.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported measures of drug use, sexual behavior, and days incarcerated are sufficiently accurate to detect intervention effects despite memory lapses and social biases.
- Rests on an assumption: Attrition from the original sample did not bias results after controlling for identified variables.
- Rests on an assumption: CBO participation effects are not entirely due to self-selection.
- Findingown data
Among participants assigned to REAL MEN, attending four or more educational sessions was associated with a more pronounced reduction in the odds of alcohol or drug dependence at follow-up (OR=.401, p≤.05).
“For those participants who attended four or more sessions, the effect was more pronounced (OR= .401, p≤.05)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported measures of drug use, sexual behavior, and days incarcerated are sufficiently accurate to detect intervention effects despite memory lapses and social biases.
- Rests on an assumption: Attrition from the original sample did not bias results after controlling for identified variables.
- Findingown data
Participants who participated in both the REAL MEN intervention and the CBO experienced higher levels of constructive outcomes after leaving jail (OR=2.68, p≤.05).
“As discussed earlier, those who participated in both the REAL MEN intervention and the CBO experienced even higher levels of constructive outcomes after leaving jail (OR=2.68, p≤.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported measures of drug use, sexual behavior, and days incarcerated are sufficiently accurate to detect intervention effects despite memory lapses and social biases.
- Rests on an assumption: Attrition from the original sample did not bias results after controlling for identified variables.
- Rests on an assumption: CBO participation effects are not entirely due to self-selection.
- Findingown data
Among participants assigned to REAL MEN who were incarcerated after the index incarceration, the intervention was associated with about 29 fewer days spent in jail in the year after release compared with the jail-based session only group (p≤.05).
“Compared to the group assigned to the jail-based session only, participants assigned to the REAL MEN intervention who were incarcerated after the index incarceration spent about 29 fewer days in jail (p≤.05).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Finally, of those incarcerated for at least one day after release, the participants assigned to REAL MEN reported on average 29 fewer days in jail in the year after their release compared to those who only received services while in jail.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported measures of drug use, sexual behavior, and days incarcerated are sufficiently accurate to detect intervention effects despite memory lapses and social biases.
- Rests on an assumption: Attrition from the original sample did not bias results after controlling for identified variables.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
Of the 275 individuals assigned to the group that received only jail-based services, 17% made at least one visit to the CBO.
“Of the 275 individuals assigned to the group that received only jail-based services, 17% made at least one visit to the CBO.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CBO participation effects are not entirely due to self-selection.
- Findingown data
Assignment to the REAL MEN group reduced the likelihood of hard drug use after release (OR=.166, p≤.05).
“Assignment to the REAL MEN group also reduced the likelihood that jailed adolescents would engage in hard drug use after release (OR=.166, p≤.05), although only 5% of the sample reported such use in the 90 days prior to the follow-up interview.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported measures of drug use, sexual behavior, and days incarcerated are sufficiently accurate to detect intervention effects despite memory lapses and social biases.
- Rests on an assumption: Attrition from the original sample did not bias results after controlling for identified variables.
- Findingown data
Making at least one visit to the CBO significantly reduced the odds of alcohol or drug dependence at the one-year follow-up compared with making no CBO visits (OR=.412, p≤.05).
“as was the case for those who made at least one visit to the CBO (OR=.412, p≤.05) compared to those who did not make any CBO visits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported measures of drug use, sexual behavior, and days incarcerated are sufficiently accurate to detect intervention effects despite memory lapses and social biases.
- Rests on an assumption: Attrition from the original sample did not bias results after controlling for identified variables.
- Rests on an assumption: CBO participation effects are not entirely due to self-selection.
- Findingown data
Assignment to the REAL MEN intervention significantly reduced the odds of alcohol or drug dependence at the one-year follow-up compared with the comparison group (OR=.519, p≤.05).
“Participants assigned to the REAL MEN intervention were less likely (OR=.519, p≤.05) than the comparison group to report alcohol or drug dependence at the time of the follow-up interview.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported measures of drug use, sexual behavior, and days incarcerated are sufficiently accurate to detect intervention effects despite memory lapses and social biases.
- Rests on an assumption: Attrition from the original sample did not bias results after controlling for identified variables.
- Interpretationreasoning
The difference of 29 fewer days in jail could yield savings of as much as $7,308 per person, based on a 2003 estimate of $252 per day in jail in New York City.
“Given that a 2003 estimate of the full cost of a day in jail in New York City was $252 [27], this difference could yield a savings of as much as $7,308 per person.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported measures of drug use, sexual behavior, and days incarcerated are sufficiently accurate to detect intervention effects despite memory lapses and social biases.
- Interpretationown data
The study showed that it is possible to recruit, engage, and retain jailed male adolescents in multi-faceted interventions to reduce recidivism and improve post-release prospects.
“In conclusion, our study showed that it is possible to recruit, engage, and retain jailed male adolescents in multi-faceted interventions to reduce recidivism and improve post-release prospects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Some adolescents in New York City who have experienced incarceration are eager to explore alternative pathways.
“Still, our findings show that some adolescents in New York City who have experienced incarceration are eager to explore alternative pathways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The majority of adolescents are rearrested within a year.
“The majority is rearrested within a year [3,12].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Freudenberg, 2008, Coming home from jail: The social and health consequences of community reentry for women, male adolescents, and their families and communities, Am J Public Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Fagan, 1996, The comparative advantage of juvenile versus criminal court sanctions on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders, Law Policy source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
These findings demonstrate the feasibility of conducting randomized intervention trials that follow incarcerated people after release.
“These findings demonstrate the feasibility of conducting randomized intervention trials that follow incarcerated people after release.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Between adolescence and the early adult years, both HIV/STI risk and drug use increase significantly among the incarcerated.
“Between adolescence and the early adult years, both HIV/STI risk and drug use increase significantly among the incarcerated [1, 11]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Freudenberg, 2007, Comparison of health and social characteristics of people leaving New York City jails by age, gender, and race/ethnicity: Implications for public health interventions, Public Health Rep source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Robertson, 2005, Predictors of infection with Chlamydia or gonorrhea in incarcerated adolescents, Sex Transm Dis source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Adolescents in jail have higher rates of HIV risk behaviors and sexually transmitted infections than comparable non-jailed populations.
“Adolescents in jail have higher rates of HIV risk behaviors and sexually transmitted infections than comparable non-jailed populations [7, 8, 9, 10].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] DiClemente, 1991, Comparison of AIDS knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors among incarcerated adolescents and a public school sample in San Francisco, Am J Public Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Golzari, 2006, The health status of youth in juvenile detention facilities, J Adolesc Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Morris, 1998, Variations in HIV risk behaviors of incarcerated juveniles during a four-year period: 1989–1992, J Adolesc Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Since individuals were not randomly assigned to the CBO, their participation reflects self-selection.
“Since individuals were not randomly assigned to the CBO, their participation reflects self-selection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The study relies on self-reported data on drug and sexual behavior and on the number of days spent incarcerated, which are subject to memory lapses and social biases.
“It relies on self-reported data on drug and sexual behavior and on the number of days spent incarcerated – all subject to memory lapses and social biases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The sample was recruited entirely from one city, limiting generalizability to other jurisdictions.
“Similarly, our sample was recruited entirely from one city, limiting generalizability to other jurisdictions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 14
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 5
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe REAL MEN project demonstrated the capacity to recruit and engage male adolescents to voluntarily participate in services while in jail and after release, and to maintain contact with them after release.
“In summary, the REAL MEN project demonstrated the capacity to recruit and engage male adolescents to voluntarily participate in services while in jail and after their release, as well as the ability to maintain contact with them after release.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeither assignment to the REAL MEN intervention alone nor participation in the CBO alone reduced risky sexual behaviors.
“While neither assignment to the REAL MEN intervention alone nor participation in the CBO alone reduced risky sexual behaviors, the combined impact of these services did.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported measures of drug use, sexual behavior, and days incarcerated are sufficiently accurate to detect intervention effects despite memory lapses and social biases.
- Rests on an assumption: Attrition from the original sample did not bias results after controlling for identified variables.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipation in either the REAL MEN intervention or visits to the CBO did not appear to affect criminal justice outcomes post-release.
“As Table 2 shows, participation in either the REAL MEN intervention or visits to the CBO did not appear to affect criminal justice outcomes post-release.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported measures of drug use, sexual behavior, and days incarcerated are sufficiently accurate to detect intervention effects despite memory lapses and social biases.
- Rests on an assumption: Attrition from the original sample did not bias results after controlling for identified variables.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the 277 male adolescents assigned to jail and community services, 177 (64%) participated in at least four educational sessions, 125 (45%) made at least one visit to the CBO, and 111 (40%) participated in four or more educational sessions and made a visit to the CBO.
“Of the 277 male adolescents assigned to jail and community services, 177 (64%) participated in at least four educational sessions, 125 (45%) made at least one visit to the CBO, and 111 (40%) participated in four or more educational sessions and made a visit to the CBO.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRates of drug use, risky sexual behavior, and recidivism remained high for all participants after release from jail.
“rates of drug use, risky sexual behavior, and recidivism remained high for all participants after release from jail”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“the levels of marijuana and alcohol use, risky sexual behavior, and recidivism remained high for all groups at the time of the second interview”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported measures of drug use, sexual behavior, and days incarcerated are sufficiently accurate to detect intervention effects despite memory lapses and social biases.
- Rests on an assumption: Attrition from the original sample did not bias results after controlling for identified variables.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany incarcerated youth struggle with drug and alcohol problems, as well as educational and psychological difficulties.
“many incarcerated youth struggle with drug and alcohol problems [3,4], as well as educational [3,5] and psychological difficulties [4,6]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [3] Freudenberg, 2008, Coming home from jail: The social and health consequences of community reentry for women, male adolescents, and their families and communities, Am J Public Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Lader, 2003, Psychiatric morbidity among young offenders in England and Wales, Int Rev Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Ramchand, 2009, Seven-year life outcomes of adolescent offenders in Los Angeles, Am J Public Health source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMany adolescents are incarcerated on drug use or sales charges.
“Many adolescents are incarcerated on drug use or sales charges [1,2]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Freudenberg, 2007, Comparison of health and social characteristics of people leaving New York City jails by age, gender, and race/ethnicity: Implications for public health interventions, Public Health Rep source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Levine, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious research and other studies suggest that interventions while individuals are in jail or in the days and weeks after release have the potential to be cost-effective, achieve high retention rates, and protect adolescents from returning to drug use, crime, or HIV risk behavior.
“Our previous research [13,14,15], as well as other studies [16,17], suggest that interventions while individuals are in jail – or in the days and weeks after they are released – have the potential to be cost-effective, achieve high retention rates, and protect adolescents from returning to drug use, crime, or HIV risk behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [13] Needels, 2005, Community case management for former jail inmates: Its impacts on rearrest, drug use, and HIV risk, J Urban Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Freudenberg, 1998, Linking women in jail to community services: Factors associated with rearrest and retention of drug-using women following release from jail, J Am Med Womens Assoc
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Health link program provided health and community services to current and former inmates of New York City's Rikers Island jail. Available at: http://www.rwjf.org/pr/product.jsp?id=16734. Accessed July 22, 2009.
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataParticipants were randomly assigned to receive a single jail-based discharge planning session or a 30-hour psychosocial educational group-based intervention that began in jail and continued in the community after release.
“After the interview, participants were randomly assigned to receive a single jail-based discharge planning session or a 30-hour psychosocial educational group-based intervention that began in jail and continued in the community after release.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe sample resembles the larger population of adolescent males leaving New York City jails on basic demographic characteristics but may differ on other unmeasured dimensions, limiting generalizability.
“While our sample resembles the larger population of adolescent males leaving New York City jails on basic demographic characteristics, it may differ on other unmeasured dimensions, which limits our ability to make generalizations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFollow-up completers differed from non-completers on several baseline indicators, and all models controlled for these factors.
“The participants who completed the follow-up interview (N=397) were different from those who did not (N=155) on a few indicators”
- Also stated in: § Participants · plain
“All models in this evaluation controlled for these factors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Participants · plain
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataParticipants randomly assigned to the intervention differed from comparison participants on baseline indicators, suggesting the intervention group was at a slight disadvantage, and multivariate analyses controlled for these baseline characteristics.
“In multivariate analyses of treatment effectiveness, we controlled for these baseline characteristics, along with several other baseline controls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe Time 2 follow-up interview was completed by 397 participants, a follow-up rate of 72%.
“The Time 2 interview was completed by 397 participants – a follow-up rate of 72%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study did not conduct a cost-benefit analysis, so it could not assess whether the benefits of this approach exceed its costs.
“Finally, we did not conduct a cost-benefit analysis, and were thus not able to assess whether the benefits of this approach exceed its costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataNone of the participants identified as gay, bisexual or transgendered, or reported any sexual contact with other young men, so the findings do not address the special needs of jailed adolescents who identify as gay.
“In addition, none of the participants enrolled in the study identified as gay, bisexual or transgendered, or reported any sexual contact with other young men, perhaps reflecting both the powerful social desirability of heteronormativity and the danger of such a disclosure within a jail. Thus, findings reported here do not address the special needs of jailed adolescents who identify as gay.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAttrition from the original sample may have biased results, although the study controlled for relevant variables it was able to identify.
“In addition, it is possible that attrition from the original sample may have biased results, although we controlled for relevant variables we were able to identify.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Most adolescents are released from jail within a few weeks of arrest, usually without access to community services.
“Most adolescents are released from jail within a few weeks of arrest, usually without access to community services.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Self-reported measures of drug use, sexual behavior, and days incarcerated are sufficiently accurate to detect intervention effects despite memory lapses and social biases.
“It relies on self-reported data on drug and sexual behavior and on the number of days spent incarcerated – all subject to memory lapses and social biases.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Attrition from the original sample did not bias results after controlling for identified variables.
“In addition, it is possible that attrition from the original sample may have biased results, although we controlled for relevant variables we were able to identify.”
The paper relies on this without support.
CBO participation effects are not entirely due to self-selection.
“Since individuals were not randomly assigned to the CBO, their participation reflects self-selection.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a study of 16 to 18 year old African American and Latino males being released from jail, those who received an eight session, 30-hour educational program that included building racial pride had spent fewer days in jail, were more likely to have attended school and found work, and had reduced odds of substance abuse one year after release.
“The study found that one year after release, those who had received the comprehensive intervention had spent fewer days in jail, were more likely to have attended school and found work, and had reduced odds of substance abuse [123].”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [123]
Cites
Task Force on Community Preventive Services
(2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195151091.002.0004 · Cited by 1,162 · see citing works
Fazel, S., Doll, H., & Långström, N. (2008) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/chi.obo13e31817eecf3 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
From Prison to Home - The Dimensions and Consequences of Prisoner Reentry
Travis, J., Solomon, A. L., & Waul, M. (2001) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e720982011-001 · Cited by 568 · see citing works
Freudenberg, N., Daniels, J., Crum, M., Perkins, T., & Richie, B. E. (2005) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2004.056325 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Self-citationGender, Race, Class and Health: Intersectional Approaches
Schulz, A. J., & Mullings, L. (2010) · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Multisystemic Treatment: A Meta-Analysis of Outcome Studies.
Curtis, N. M., Ronan, K. R., & Borduin, C. M. (2004) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/0893-3200.18.3.411 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Logistic Regression: Description, Examples, and Comparisons
Morgan, S. P., & Teachman, J. D. (1988) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352104 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Teplin, L. A., Elkington, K. S., McClelland, G. M., Abram, K. M., Mericle, A. A., & Washburn, J. J. (2005) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.56.7.823 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Psychiatric morbidity among young offenders in England and Wales
Lader, D., Singleton, N., & Meltzer, H. (2003) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/0954026021000046074 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
The health status of youth in juvenile detention facilities
GOLZARI, M., HUNT, S., & ANOSHIRAVANI, A. (2006) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.06.008 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
FAGAN, J. (1996) · Law & Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.1996.tb00165.x · Cited by 160 · see citing works
DiClemente, R. J., Lanier, M. M., Horan, P. F., & Lodico, M. (1991) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.81.5.628 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Regression analysis for social sciences
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3372 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Juvenile transfer laws: An effective deterrent to delinquency?
Redding, R. E. (2008) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e479412008-001 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Regression Analysis for Social Sciences
von Eye, A., & Schuster, C. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Freudenberg, N., Moseley, J., Labriola, M., Daniels, J., & Murrill, C. (2007) · Public Health Reports® · doi:10.1177/003335490712200605 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationEmpirical Risk Factors for Delinquency and Best Treatments: Where do we go from here?
Zagar, R. J., Busch, K. G., & Hughes, J. R. (2009) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.104.1.279-308 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Variations in HIV risk behaviors of incarcerated juveniles during a four-year period: 1989–1992
Morris, R. E., Baker, C. J., Valentine, M., & Pennisi, A. J. (1998) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s1054-139x(97)00268-1 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Freudenberg, N., Daniels, J., Crum, M., Perkins, T., & Richie, B. E. (2008) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.98.supplement_1.s191 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationMcGowan, A., Hahn, R., Liberman, A., Crosby, A., Fullilove, M., Johnson, R., Moscicki, E., Price, L., Snyder, S., Tuma, F., et al. (2007) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.12.003 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Predictors of infection with Chlamydia or gonorrhea in incarcerated adolescents
Robertson, A. A., Thomas, C. B., St. Lawrence, J. S., & Pack, R. (2005) · Sexually Transmitted Diseases · doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000151419.11934.1b · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement Databook
Sickmund, M. (2000) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e381232004-001 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Community case management for former jail inmates: Its impacts on rearrest, drug use, and HIV risk
Needels, K. (2005) · Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jurban/jti092 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Seven-year life outcomes of adolescent offenders in Los Angeles
Ramchand, R., Morral, A. R., & Becker, K. (2009) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2008.142281 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Freudenberg, N., Wilets, I. F., Greene, M. B., & Richie, B. E. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationReducing Out-of-Community Placement and Recidivism
Sullivan, C. J., Veysey, B. M., Hamilton, Z. K., & Grillo, M. (2007) · International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x06296237 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Daniels, J., Crum, M., Ramaswamy, M., & Freudenberg, N. (2009) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839909331910 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationDembo, R., Wothke, W., Livingston, S., & Schmeidler, J. (2002) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1081/ja-120014082 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Project: HIV Prevention for Incarcerated Youth in Indiana
Schlapman, N., & Cass, P. S. (2000) · Journal of Community Health Nursing · doi:10.1207/s15327655jchn1703_03 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
AIDS AND DRUG USE PREVENTION INTERVENTION FOR CONFINED YOUTHFUL OFFENDERS
Shelton, D. (2001) · Issues in Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1080/01612840120509 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Interventions to Reduce Sexual Risk for Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Adolescents
Johnson, B. T., Carey, M. P., Marsh, K. L., Levin, K. D., & Scott‐Sheldon, L. A. J. (2003) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.4.381 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Blechman, E. A., & Vryan, K. D. (2000) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1359-1789(98)00013-5 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lowenkamp, 2005, Developing successful reentry programs: Lessons from the ‘what works’ research, Correct Today, 71
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Public Health and the Epidemic of Incarceration
Dumont, D. M., Brockmann, B., Dickman, S., Alexander, N. E., & Rich, J. D. (2012) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124614 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action
Williams, D. R., & Cooper, L. A. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16040606 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Community Organizing and Community Building for Health and Welfare
Minkler, M. (2019) · Rutgers University Press eBooks · doi:10.36019/9780813553146 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
MacArthur, G. J., Caldwell, D. M., Redmore, J., Watkins, S., Kipping, R., White, J., Chittleborough, C., Langford, R. M., Er, V., Lingam, R., et al. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009927.pub2 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Kouyoumdjian, F. G., McIsaac, K. E., Liauw, J., Green, S., Karachiwalla, F., Siu, W., Burkholder, K., Binswanger, I. A., Kiefer, L., Kinner, S. A., et al. (2015) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2014.302498 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Pharmacological interventions for drug-using offenders
Perry, A., Neilson, M., James, M. M., Glanville, J., Woodhouse, R., Godfrey, C., & Hewitt, C. E. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010862.pub2 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Ramaswamy, M., Unruh, E., & Comfort, M. L. (2018) · Women s Reproductive Health · doi:10.1080/23293691.2018.1429373 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationGroot, E., Kouyoumdjian, F. G., Kiefer, L., Madadi, P., Gross, J., Prevost, B., Jhirad, R., Huyer, D., Snowdon, V., & Persaud, N. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157512 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Tinner, L., Caldwell, D. M., Hickman, M., MacArthur, G. J., Gottfredson, D. C., Lana, A., Moberg, D. P., Wolfe, D. A., & Campbell, R. M. (2018) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-018-6042-0 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Spittal, M. J., Forsyth, S. J., Borschmann, R., Young, J. T., & Kinner, S. A. (2017) · Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences · doi:10.1017/s2045796017000506 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Khan, M. R., Golin, C. E., Friedman, S. R., Scheidell, J. D., Adimora, A. A., Judon-Monk, S., Hobbs, M. M., Dockery, G., Griffin, S. C., Oza, K. K., et al. (2015) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-015-1062-6 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Ramaswamy, M., & Kelly, P. J. (2015) · Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved · doi:10.1353/hpu.2015.0130 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Development of a Brief Jail-Based Cervical Health Promotion Intervention
Ramaswamy, M., Simmons, R., & Kelly, P. J. (2014) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839914541658 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationBoutrin, M., & Williams, D. R. (2021) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare9060673 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Interventions for female drug-using offenders
Perry, A., Neilson, M., James, M. M., Glanville, J., Woodhouse, R., & Hewitt, C. E. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010910.pub2 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Strayhorn, T. L., Johnson, & Barrett (2013) · Spectrum A Journal on Black Men · doi:10.2979/spectrum.2.1.73 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Pharmacological interventions for drug-using offenders
Perry, A., Neilson, M., James, M. M., Glanville, J., McCool, R., Duffy, S., Godfrey, C., & Hewitt, C. E. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010862 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Interventions for drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental illness
Perry, A., Neilson, M., James, M. M., Glanville, J., Woodhouse, R., Godfrey, C., & Hewitt, C. E. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010901.pub2 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Perry, A., Woodhouse, R., Neilson, M., Martyn St James, M., Glanville, J., Hewitt, C., & Trépel, D. (2016) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph13100966 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Ramaswamy, M., & Freudenberg, N. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-689 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationAn Empirical Ethics Agenda for Psychiatric Research Involving Prisoners
Christopher, P. P., Candilis, P. J., Rich, J. D., & Lidz, C. W. (2011) · AJOB Primary Research · doi:10.1080/21507716.2011.627082 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Panuccio, E. A., & Christian, J. (2017) · Race and Justice · doi:10.1177/2153368717705419 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
HIV Prevention and Education in State Prison Systems
Lyons, T. P., Osunkoya, E., Anguh, I., Adefuye, A. S., & Balogun, J. A. (2014) · Journal of Correctional Health Care · doi:10.1177/1078345813518630 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Ramaswamy, M., Faseru, B., Cropsey, K. L., Jones, M. D., Deculus, K., & Freudenberg, N. (2013) · Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy · doi:10.1186/1747-597x-8-37 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationMarcell, A. V., Allan, E., Clay, E. A., Watson, C., & Sonenstein, F. L. (2013) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/4503313 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Ramaswamy, M., & Freudenberg, N. (2012) · Journal of Poverty · doi:10.1080/10875549.2011.639862 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationInterventions for drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental illness
Perry, A., Neilson, M., James, M. M., Glanville, J., McCool, R., Duffy, S., Godfrey, C., & Hewitt, C. E. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010901 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
SDG commentary: services from institutions that offer fair and sustainable living for all humans
Gordon, R., & Vink, J. (2023) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-05-2023-0182 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Upadhyayula, S., Ramaswamy, M., Chalise, P., Daniels, J., & Freudenberg, N. (2017) · Youth & Society · doi:10.1177/0044118x15576736 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Barnert, E. S., Sun, A., Abrams, L. S., & Chung, P. J. (2019) · BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health · doi:10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200386 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Arcaya, M. C., & Briggs, X. D. S. (2011) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0778 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
McNeill-Johnson, A. D., Glenn, J. E., Daniel, N. I., Menon, M., Aboul-Enein, B. H., Kelly, P. J., & Ramaswamy, M. (2025) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.12.012 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationCoatsworth, A. M., Scheidell, J. D., Wohl, D. A., Whitehead, N. E., Golin, C. E., Judon-Monk, S., & Khan, M. R. (2017) · Journal of Urban Health · doi:10.1007/s11524-016-0120-3 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Interventions for female drug-using offenders
Perry, A., Neilson, M., James, M. M., Glanville, J., McCool, R., Duffy, S., Godfrey, C., & Hewitt, C. E. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010910 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Sexual health interventions for young people in state care: a systematic review
Hammarström, S., Stenqvist, K., & Lindroth, M. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/1403494818783077 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
HEALTH INTERVENTIONS FOR PRISONERS Update of the literature since 2007
Schwitters, A. M. (2014) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
s ysteMatiC review of y outh CriMe Prevention interventions
Manuel, C. (2012) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Applegarth, D. M., Jones, P., & Holliday, S. B. (2023) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/rra1663-2 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Gerchow, C. (2015) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Delaney, D. J., Stein, L. A. R., Bassett, S. S., & Clarke, J. G. (2021) · Psychological Services · doi:10.1037/ser0000552 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Reducing Antisocial Behavior and Promoting Healthy Outcomes for Incarcerated Adolescents
Jenson, J. M. (2010) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.025 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Moe, C., Titzler, B., Johnson-Gross, M., Conley, D., Blankenberger, E., Richardson, K., Owen, B., Griffen, C., Kuka, A., Stanton, G. C., et al. (2015) · ISU Red - Research and eData (Illinois State University)
Kouyoumdjian, F. G., McIsaac, K. E., Liauw, J., Green, S., Karachiwalla, F., Siu, W., Burkholder, K., Binswanger, I. A., Kiefer, L., Kinner, S. A., et al. (2015)
Brown, A. L. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/88jt-3a33
(2010) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s1054-139x(10)00452-0
Brown, A. L., Powell, W., Doherty, I. A., Barringnton, C., & Eng, G. (2022) · Annals of LGBTQ Public and Population Health · doi:10.1891/lgbtq-2020-0067
(2024) · American Psychiatric Association Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9798894550725.lg09
Mizelle, D. L., Wheeler, P. B., Peterson, R. L., Malone, N. J., Smith, A., & Stevens-Watkins, D. J. (2026) · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs · doi:10.1080/02791072.2026.2696254
- Authors
- Freudenberg, N., Ramaswamy, M., Daniels, J., Crum, M., Ompad, D. C., & Vlahov, D.
- Affiliations
- City University of New York (US)
- University of Kansas (US)
- The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
- New York Academy of Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Freudenberg, Nicholas
- Venue
- Journal of Adolescent Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 448-455
- ISSN
- 1054-139X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2963792
- OpenAlex
- W1992714001
- Semantic Scholar
- cd53c6fd85bb1b6b924b91773cc8589975b233f8
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 12.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- New York Academy of Medicine
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA014725)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- young men, drug use, HIV risk, sexual risk behavior, recidivism, substance dependence, community organizations, discharge planning, African American men, Hispanic men, school attendance, employment, adolescent boys, New York City jails
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Humans, Male, New York City, Prisoners, Sexual Behavior, Program Evaluation, HIV Infections, Community Networks, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review