The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Programmed cell death in plants: distinguishing between different modes
Open accessAbstract
Programmed cell death (PCD) in plants is a crucial component of development and defence mechanisms. In animals, different types of cell death (apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis) have been distinguished morphologically and discussed in these morphological terms. PCD is largely used to describe the processes of apoptosis and autophagy (although some use PCD and apoptosis interchangeably) while necrosis is generally described as a chaotic and uncontrolled mode of death. In plants, the term PCD is widely used to describe most instances of death observed. At present, there is a vast array of plant cell culture models and developmental systems being studied by different research groups and it is clear from what is described in this mass of literature that, as with animals, there does not appear to be just one type of PCD in plants. It is fundamentally important to be able to distinguish between different types of cell death for several reasons. For example, it is clear that, in cell culture systems, the window of time in which 'PCD' is studied by different groups varies hugely and this can have profound effects on the interpretation of data and complicates attempts to compare different researcher's data. In addition, different types of PCD will probably have different regulators and modes of death. For this reason, in plant cell cultures an apoptotic-like PCD (AL-PCD) has been identified that is fairly rapid and results in a distinct corpse morphology which is visible 4-6 h after release of cytochrome c and other apoptogenic proteins. This type of morphology, distinct from autophagy and from necrosis, has also been observed in examples of plant development. In this review, our model system and how it is used to distinguish specifically between AL-PCD and necrosis will be discussed. The different types of PCD observed in plants will also be discussed and the importance of distinguishing between different forms of cell death will be highlighted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Apoptosis: A Basic Biological Phenomenon with Wideranging Implications in Tissue Kinetics
Kerr, J. F. R., Wyllie, A. H., & Currie, A. R. (1972) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1972.33 · Cited by 15,725
Green, D. R., & Reed, J. C. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5381.1309 · Cited by 8,965
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 2,381
Shimizu, S., Narita, M., Tsujimoto, Y., & Tsujimoto, Y. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/20959 · Cited by 2,178
Lemasters, J. J., Nieminen, A.-L., Qian, T., Trost, L. C., Elmore, S. P., Nishimura, Y., Crowe, R. A., Cascio, W. E., Bradham, C. A., Brenner, D. A., et al. (1998) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/s0005-2728(98)00112-1 · Cited by 1,387
Cell death by necrosis: towards a molecular definition
Golstein, P., & Kroemer, G. (2007) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2006.11.001 · Cited by 1,044
Lockshin, R. A., & Beaulaton, J. (1974) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/0024-3205(74)90321-x · Cited by 952
Suicidal Tendencies: Apoptotic Cell Death by Caspase Family Proteinases
Wolf, B. B., & Green, D. R. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.29.20049 · Cited by 942
Programmed Cell Death in Plants.
Pennell, R. I., & Lamb, C. (1997) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.9.7.1157 · Cited by 852
Dose‐dependent induction of apoptosis in human tumour cell lines by widely diverging stimuli
Lennon, S. V., Martin, S. J., & Cotter, T. G. (1991) · Cell Proliferation · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2184.1991.tb01150.x · Cited by 812
Cited by
Hypersensitivity to DNA damage in plant stem cell niches
Fulcher, N., & Sablowski, R. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0909218106 · Cited by 277
Salt stress-induced cell death in the unicellular green alga Micrasterias denticulata
Affenzeller, M. J., Darehshouri, A., Andosch, A., Lutz, C., & Lutz-Meindl, U. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ern348 · Cited by 263
Tewari, R. K., Hadacek, F., Sassmann, S., & Lang, I. (2013) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.03.006 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Reape, T. J., Molony, E. M., & McCabe, P. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 435-444
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2130454895
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Programmed cell death in plants: distinguishing between different modes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erm258
- The paper
- Reape, T. J., Molony, E. M., & McCabe, P. F. (2008). Programmed cell death in plants: distinguishing between different modes. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm258
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.