The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Light sheet microscopy reveals more gradual light attenuation in light-green versus dark-green soybean leaves.
Open accessAbstract
Light wavelengths preferentially absorbed by chlorophyll (chl) often display steep absorption gradients. This over-saturates photosynthesis in upper chloroplasts and deprives lower chloroplasts of blue and red light. Reducing chl content could create a more even leaf light distribution and thereby increase leaf light-use efficiency and overall canopy photosynthesis. This was tested on soybean cultivar 'Clark' (WT) and a near-isogenic chl b deficient mutant, Y11y11, grown in controlled environment chambers and in the field. Light attenuation was quantified using a novel approach involving light sheet microscopy. Leaf adaxial and abaxial surfaces were illuminated separately with blue, red, and green wavelengths, and chl fluorescence was detected orthogonally to the illumination plane. Relative fluorescence was significantly greater in deeper layers of the Y11y11 mesophyll than in WT, with the greatest differences in blue, then red, and finally green light when illuminated from the adaxial surface. Modeled relative photosynthesis based on chlorophyll profiles and Beer's Law predicted less steep gradients in mutant relative photosynthesis rates compared to WT. Although photosynthetic light-use efficiency was greater in the field-grown mutant with ~50% lower chl, light-use efficiency was lower in the mutant when grown in chambers where chl was ~80% reduced. This difference is probably due to pleiotropic effects of the mutation that accompany very severe reductions in chlorophyll and may warrant further testing in other low-chl lines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In soybean, greater rates of Aleaf on an absorbed photon basis were evident in light-green soybean leaves, and the increase in Aleaf correlated with a more even light distribution among chloroplasts within leaves.
“In soybean, greater rates of Aleaf on an absorbed photon basis were evident in light-green soybean leaves, and the increase in Aleaf correlated with a more even light distribution among chloroplasts within leaves (Slattery et al., 2016).”
From Photosynthesis, Light Use Efficiency, and Yield of Reduced-Chlorophyll Soybean Mutants in Field Conditions (2017) · cites this paper as Slattery et al., 2016
The Results and Discussion report greater photosynthetic rates per absorbed photon in field-grown light-green mutants, alongside more evenly distributed light within their leaves. But chamber-grown mutants had lower photosynthetic efficiency, and the Conclusions say mutation-related effects prevented a definitive relationship between light distribution and efficiency. The claim omits those limits and presents the association as established. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLight sheet microscopy analyses revealed more gradual PPFD attenuation in light-green soybean leaves compared to dark-green leaves, resulting in significantly more red and blue light reaching the spongy mesophyll chloroplasts of the light-green leaves, which correlated with greater photosynthetic light use efficiency.
“Light sheet microscopy analyses revealed more gradual PPFD attenuation in light-green soybean leaves compared to dark-green leaves. This resulted in significantly more red and blue light reaching the spongy mesophyll chloroplasts of the light-green leaves, which correlated with greater photosynthetic light use efficiency (Slattery et al., 2016).”
From Photosynthesis, Light Use Efficiency, and Yield of Reduced-Chlorophyll Soybean Mutants in Field Conditions (2017) · cites this paper as Slattery et al., 2016
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSimilar responses to severe reductions in chl content (>80%) seen in y9y9 have been reported in Y11y11 when grown in controlled environment chambers at lower than field light levels.
“Similar responses to severe reductions in chl content (>80%) seen in y9y9 have been reported in Y11y11 when grown in controlled environment chambers at lower than field light levels (Xu et al., 1993; Slattery et al., 2016).”
From Photosynthesis, Light Use Efficiency, and Yield of Reduced-Chlorophyll Soybean Mutants in Field Conditions (2017) · cites this paper as Slattery et al., 2016
The Results and Discussion report that chamber-grown Y11y11 plants had inhibited photosynthetic capacity and quantum efficiency under light levels lower than in the field. But the reported chlorophyll reduction was almost 80%, not greater than 80%. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe 22% reduction in leafabs is less than the reduction predicted by Beer's law.
“Benefits to Aleaf were seen only when chl content in Y11y11 was reduced to 30–40% of WT (Figures 2C,D), which corresponded to a 22% reduction in leafabs (Figure 3) that is less than the reduction predicted by Beer’s law (Slattery et al., 2016).”
From Photosynthesis, Light Use Efficiency, and Yield of Reduced-Chlorophyll Soybean Mutants in Field Conditions (2017) · cites this paper as Slattery et al., 2016
In dark-green leaves, the majority of light absorption occurs in the uppermost adaxial chloroplasts, causing light limitation in lower chloroplasts.
“In dark-green leaves, the majority of light absorption occurs in the uppermost adaxial chloroplasts, causing light limitation in lower chloroplasts (Vogelmann and Evans, 2002; Evans and Vogelmann, 2003; Slattery et al., 2016).”
From Photosynthesis, Light Use Efficiency, and Yield of Reduced-Chlorophyll Soybean Mutants in Field Conditions (2017) · cites this paper as Slattery et al., 2016
Leaf thickness did not change in a previous study on the same soybean genotypes, even when SLW was significantly different.
“Although leaf thickness was not directly measured in this study, leaf thickness did not change in a previous study on the same soybean genotypes, even when SLW was significantly different (Slattery et al., 2016).”
From Photosynthesis, Light Use Efficiency, and Yield of Reduced-Chlorophyll Soybean Mutants in Field Conditions (2017) · cites this paper as Slattery et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield.
Zhu, X.-G., Long, S. P., & Ort, D. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112206 · Cited by 1,902
Self-citationOptimizing antenna size to maximize photosynthetic efficiency.
Ort, D. R., Zhu, X., (朱新广), & Melis, A. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.110.165886 · Cited by 338
Self-citationTsuzuki, T., Takahashi, K., Inoue, S.-I., Okigaki, Y., Tomiyama, M., Hossain, M. A., Shimazaki, K.-I., Murata, Y., & Kinoshita, T. (2011) · Journal of Plant Research · doi:10.1007/s10265-011-0426-x · Cited by 83 · cited 1×
“2015) that results in ABA insensitivity (Tsuzuki et al., 2011; Du et al., 2012) independently of chl concentration (Du et al.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02010-6 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759 · DOI
- Campbell, 2015, Identical substitutions in magnesium chelatase paralogs result in chlorophyll deficient soybean mutants, Genes|Genomes|Genetics, 5, 123, 10.1534/g3.114.015255 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01519.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s11103-012-9965-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-3002(56)90380-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1071/PP9950865 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00440.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00985.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0005-2728(88)90147-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00439.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1100035 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1005824706653 · DOI
- Kok, 1948, A critical consideration of the quantum yield of Chlorella photosynthesis, Enzymologia, 13, 1
- 10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/jxb/erg262 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1990.tb01705.x · DOI
- 10.1105/tpc.5.8.953 · DOI
- Ogren, 1993, Photosynthetic light-response curves I. The influence of CO2 partial pressure and leaf inversion, Planta, 189, 182, 10.1007/BF00195075 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03669.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1104/pp.125.1.29 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1424031112 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80347-0 · DOI
- 10.1369/0022155410394857 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00017758 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029298 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00271.x · DOI
- 10.1093/aob/mci049 · DOI
- 10.1093/pcp/pcp034 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00623.x · DOI
- Terashima, 1984, Comparative photosynthetic properties of palisade tissue chloroplasts and spongy tissue chloroplasts of Camellia japonica L.: Functional adjustment of the photosynthetic apparatus to light environment within a leaf, Plant and Cell Physiology, 25, 555
- Terashima, 1985, Vertical gradient in photosynthetic properties of spinach chloroplasts dependent on intra-leaf light environment, Plant and Cell Physiology, 26, 781, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076971 · DOI
- Terashima, 1985, Palisade tissue chloroplasts and spongy tissue chloroplasts in spinach: biochemical and ultrastructural differences, Plant and Cell Physiology, 26, 63
- Terashima, 1983, Light environment within a leaf I. Optical properties of paradermal sections of Camellia leaves with special reference to differences in the optical properties of palisade and spongy tissues, Plant and Cell Physiology, 24, 1493, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076672 · DOI
- 10.1093/aob/ · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.pp.44.060193.001311 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00910.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0065-2296(08)60024-5 · DOI
- Weber M Mickoleit M Huisken J . 2014. Light sheet microscopy. In: Waters JC Wittman T , eds. Quantitative imaging in cell biology . San Diego, CA, USA: Elsevier Academic Press, Inc., 193–215. · DOI
- Xu, 1993, Leaf photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in a chlorophyll-deficient soybean mutant, Photosynthetica, 29, 103
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Slattery, R. A., VanLoocke, A., Bernacchi, C. J., Zhu, X.-G., & Ort, D. R. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00549 · Cited by 153
“F) for clarity. that is less than the reduction predicted by Beer’s law (Slattery et al., 2016).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Slattery, R. A., Grennan, A. K., Sivaguru, M., Sozzani, R., & Ort, D. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- North Carolina State University (US)
- United States Department of Agriculture (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ort, Donald R.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-06-20
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 4697-4709
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- PMC
- PMC4973739
- OpenAlex
- W2475229147
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Botany (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Soybean genetics and cultivation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
- Keywords
- chlorophyll b deficiency, soybean, light attenuation, chlorophyll fluorescence, light-sheet microscopy, photosynthetic light-use efficiency, Beer-Lambert law
- MeSH terms
- Chlorophyll, Chloroplasts, Color, Light, Microscopy, Glycine max, Plant Leaves
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review