Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,147

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.

Handbook of Psychotherapy Integration

·2005·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

Abstract This online resource is a good overview of the growth of psychotherapy integration into a mature, empirically supported, and international movement. It provides a state-of-the-art, comprehensive description of psychotherapy and its clinical practices by leading proponents. It covers topics such as cognitive-analytic therapy, integrative psychotherapy with culturally diverse clients, cognitive-behavioural analysis system, and blending spirituality with psychotherapy. It also addresses assimilative integration, reviews the empirical research on integrative and eclectic treatments, provides guidelines that facilitate comparative analyses and ensure comprehensiveness, and includes a summary outline to help readers compare the integrative approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1093/med/9780195165791.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2015-01
OpenAlex
W1863372081
Cited by
1,147
References
0
FWCI
54.19
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.