Cited by 67Epilepsy research and treatmentCancer survivorship and careNursing care and research

A psychosocial self-management program for epilepsy: A randomized pilot study in adults

Pramuka, Michael, Hendrickson, Rick, Zinski, Anne, Van Cott, Anne C.·2007·Epilepsy & Behavior

Abstract

Objective The goal of the work described here was to develop and pilot a theoretically based self-management intervention in adults with epilepsy.Methods A randomized, controlled trial examined intervention effectiveness of a 6-week psychosocial intervention designed to improve self-efficacy and quality of life for 61 adults with diagnosed epilepsy. Measures included the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-89 inventory (QOLIE-89), the Washington Psychosocial Seizure Inventory (WPSI), a locus of control scale (LOC), and the Epilepsy Self-Efficacy Scale-2000 (ESES). Group differences were examined between groups using analysis of covariance.Results There was a significant improvement in the QOLIE-89 Role Limitations-Emotional score in the treatment group at follow-up, but no significant differences in overall quality of life. Strong and significant correlations were observed between outcome measures.Conclusion Although the intervention had little effect on improving overall quality of life, we observed promising trends in postintervention group comparisons linking self-efficacy and other psychosocial factors with quality of life. Intervention material can be modified for stage-based behavior change and retested in another study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.06.013

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pramuka, M., Hendrickson, R., Zinski, A., & Van Cott, A. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Pramuka, Michael
Venue
Epilepsy & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
533-545
ISSN
1525-5050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075814175
Cited by
67
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epilepsy & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Epilepsy Foundation
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • U.S. Public Health Service (U48/CCU320171)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
epilepsy, psychosocial interventions, self-management, self-efficacy, quality of life, locus of control, adults with epilepsy, behavior change
MeSH terms
Adult, Emotions, Epilepsy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Psychotherapy, Group, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Adjustment, Statistics as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Sickness Impact Profile, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review