Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 768

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reconstructing the linear power spectrum of cosmological mass fluctuations

Open access
Peacock, J. A., Dodds, S. J.·1994·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We describe an attempt to reconstruct the initial conditions for the formation of cosmological large-scale structure, under the assumption of gravitational instability in a Gaussian density field. Information on the power spectrum of the primordial fluctuations is provided by a variety of autocorrelation and cross-correlation analyses on samples of different classes of galaxy and galaxy clusters. These results differ from the desired linear power spectrum because of three modifying effects: bias, non-linear evolution and redshift-space distortions. We show how the latter two effects can be corrected for analytically, allowing the linear mass spectrum to be recovered provided that the bias is independent of scale for a given class of galaxy. We argue that this is a good assumption for large scales, which is well verified in practice. We apply this method to eight independent data sets, and obtain excellent agreement in the estimated linear power spectra for wavelengths |$\lambda \gtrsim 10h^{-1}$| Mpc, given the following conditions. First, the relative bias factors for Abell clusters, radio galaxies, optical galaxies and IRAS galaxies must be in the ratios |$b_\text{A} : b_\text{R} : b_\text{O} : b_\text{I} = 4.5 : 1.9 : 1.3 :1$|⁠, to within 6 per cent rms. Secondly, the data require a significant degree of redshift-space distortion: |$\Omega^{0.6}/b_\text{I} = 1.0 \pm 0.2$|⁠. Thirdly, low values of Ω and bias are disfavoured because non-linear evolution would spoil the agreement in shape between galaxy and cluster power spectra. The amplitude of the preferred linear power spectrum is only weakly dependent on Ω and agrees well at large wavelengths with the normalization demanded by the COBE data for a scale-invariant primordial spectrum, provided that Ω = 1 and gravity-wave anisotropies are negligible. In this case, the shape of the spectrum is extremely well described by a CDM transfer function with an apparent value of the fitting parameter |$\Omega h = 0.25$|⁠. Tilted models, for which inflation requires a large gravity-wave contribution to the COBE data, predict too little power at 100-Mpc wavelengths.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/267.4.1020

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 768

Metadata

Authors
Peacock, J. A., & Dodds, S. J.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
1994-04-15
Volume
267
Issue
4
Pages
1020-1034
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W1982364216
Cited by
768
References
0
FWCI
39.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconstructing the linear power spectrum of cosmological mass fluctuations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/267.4.1020
The paper
Peacock, J. A., & Dodds, S. J. (1994). Reconstructing the linear power spectrum of cosmological mass fluctuations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/267.4.1020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.