Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 157 of the 157 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simulating cosmic structure formation with the gadget-4 code

Open access
Springel, Volker, Pakmor, Rüdiger, Zier, Oliver, Reinecke, Martin·2021·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Numerical methods have become a powerful tool for research in astrophysics, but their utility depends critically on the availability of suitable simulation codes. This calls for continuous efforts in code development, which is necessitated also by the rapidly evolving technology underlying today’s computing hardware. Here, we discuss recent methodological progress in the gadget code, which has been widely applied in cosmic structure formation over the past two decades. The new version offers improvements in force accuracy, in time-stepping, in adaptivity to a large dynamic range in time-scales, in computational efficiency, and in parallel scalability through a special MPI/shared-memory parallelization and communication strategy, and a more-sophisticated domain decomposition algorithm. A manifestly momentum conserving fast multipole method (FMM) can be employed as an alternative to the one-sided TreePM gravity solver introduced in earlier versions. Two different flavours of smoothed particle hydrodynamics, a classic entropy-conserving formulation and a pressure-based approach, are supported for dealing with gaseous flows. The code is able to cope with very large problem sizes, thus allowing accurate predictions for cosmic structure formation in support of future precision tests of cosmology, and at the same time is well adapted to high dynamic range zoom-calculations with extreme variability of the particle number density in the simulated volume. The gadget-4 code is publicly released to the community and contains infrastructure for on-the-fly group and substructure finding and tracking, as well as merger tree building, a simple model for radiative cooling and star formation, a high dynamic range power spectrum estimator, and an initial condition generator based on second-order Lagrangian perturbation theory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stab1855

Cites

157 of 157 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 157 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Almgren, 2013, ApJ, 765, 39, 10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/39 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/765/1/39
  2. Barnes, 1990, J. Comput. Phys., 87, 161, 10.1016/0021-9991(90)90232-P · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(90)90232-p
  3. Borrow, 2018, Proceedings of the 13th SPHERIC International Workshop, 44
  4. Capuzzo-Dolcetta, 1998, J. Comput. Phys., 143, 29, 10.1006/jcph.1998.5949 · doi:10.1006/jcph.1998.5949
  5. Coles, 2020, Comput. Phys. Commun., 251, 107081, 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.107081 · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2019.107081
  6. Creasey, 2018, Astron. Comput., 25, 159, 10.1016/j.ascom.2018.09.010 · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2018.09.010
  7. Gaburov, 2011, MNRAS, 414, 129, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18313.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18313.x
  8. Glimm, 1965, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 18, 697, 10.1002/cpa.3160180408 · doi:10.1002/cpa.3160180408
  9. Heß, 2010, MNRAS, 406, 2289, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16892.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16892.x
  10. Hosono, 2016, ApJS, 224, 32, 10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/32 · doi:10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/32
  11. Huang, 2019, MNRAS, 484, 2021, 10.1093/mnras/stz057 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz057
  12. Huang, 2018, MNRAS, 478, 5063, 10.1093/mnras/sty1329 · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1329
  13. Hunter, 1972, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 4, 219, 10.1146/annurev.fl.04.010172.001251 · doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.04.010172.001251
  14. Ishiyama, 2020, MNRAS
  15. Ishiyama, 2012, Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC ’12
  16. Kodama, 2019, PASJ, 71, 35, 10.1093/pasj/psy151 · doi:10.1093/pasj/psy151
  17. Ledoux, 1951, Ann. Astrophys., 14, 438
  18. Maciejewski, 2009, MNRAS, 393, 703, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14121.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14121.x
  19. McNally, 2012, ApJS, 200, 7, 10.1088/0067-0049/200/1/7 · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/200/1/7
  20. Murante, 2011, MNRAS, 417, 136, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19021.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19021.x
  21. Roy, 2014, A&A, 564, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322555 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322555
  22. Schmidt, 2018, MNRAS, 479, 162, 10.1093/mnras/sty1430 · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1430
  23. Schuchart, 2018, Hpc Asia’18: Proceedings of Workshops of Hpc Asia, Vol. 21
  24. Scoccimarro, 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 85, 083002
  25. Sembolini, 2016, MNRAS, 457, 4063, 10.1093/mnras/stw250 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw250
  26. Skory, 2010, ApJS, 191, 43, 10.1088/0067-0049/191/1/43 · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/191/1/43
  27. Tanikawa, 2012, New Astron., 17, 82, 10.1016/j.newast.2011.07.001 · doi:10.1016/j.newast.2011.07.001
  28. Tanikawa, 2013, New Astron., 19, 74, 10.1016/j.newast.2012.08.009 · doi:10.1016/j.newast.2012.08.009
  29. Thiébaut, 2008, MNRAS, 387, 397, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13250.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13250.x
  30. Valdarnini, 2012, A&A, 546, A45, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219715 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219715
  31. Vazza, 2011, MNRAS, 410, 461, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17455.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17455.x
  32. White, 1996, Cosmology and Large Scale Structure, Proceedings of the Les Houches Summer School, 349
  33. Williams, 2012, C++ Concurrency in Action: Practical Multithreading
  34. Winkel, 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun., 183, 880, 10.1016/j.cpc.2011.12.013 · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2011.12.013
  35. Yoshikawa, 2018, Res. Notes AAS, 2, 231, 10.3847/2515-5172/aaf7a2 · doi:10.3847/2515-5172/aaf7a2
  36. Yu, 2018, ApJS, 237, 24, 10.3847/1538-4365/aac830 · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aac830
  37. Zhang, 2018, Phys. Rev. D, 98, 103530
  38. Zhu, 2015, ApJ, 800, 6, 10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/6 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/800/1/6

Cited by

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Springel, V., Pakmor, R., Zier, O., & Reinecke, M.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2021-07-01
Volume
506
Issue
2
Pages
2871-2949
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W3092395542
Cited by
422
References
157
FWCI
33.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Funders
European Research Council (EXAGAL-308037)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulating cosmic structure formation with the gadget-4 code. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stab1855
The paper
Springel, V., Pakmor, R., Zier, O., & Reinecke, M. (2021). Simulating cosmic structure formation with the gadget-4 code. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1855

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.