The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A combined analysis of the H 0 late time direct measurements and the impact on the Dark Energy sector
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT We combine 23 Hubble constant measurements based on Cepheids-SN Ia, TRGB-SN Ia, Miras-SN Ia, Masers, Tully Fisher, Surface Brightness Fluctuations, SN II, Time-delay Lensing, Standard Sirens and γ-ray Attenuation, obtaining our best optimistic H0 estimate, that is H0 = 72.94 ± 0.75 km s–1 Mpc–1 at 68 per cent CL. This is in 5.9σ tension with the ΛCDM model, therefore we evaluate its impact on the extended Dark Energy cosmological models that can alleviate the tension. We find more than 4.9σ evidence for a phantom Dark Energy equation of state in the wCDM scenario, the cosmological constant ruled out at more than 3σ in a w0waCDM model and more than 5.7σ evidence for a coupling between Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the IDE scenario. Finally, we check the robustness of our results; and we quote two additional combinations of the Hubble constant. The ultra-conservative estimate, H0 = 72.7 ± 1.1 km s–1 Mpc–1 at 68 per cent CL, is obtained removing the Cepheids-SN Ia and the Time-Delay Lensing based measurements, and confirms the evidence for new physics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136 · Cited by 16,627
Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 · Cited by 14,258
Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach
Lewis, A., & Bridle, S. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.103511 · Cited by 3,495
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parametersPreprint
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.06209 · Cited by 3,364
NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: FINAL MAPS AND RESULTS
Bennett, C. L., Larson, D., Weiland, J. L., Jarosik, N., Hinshaw, G., Odegard, N., Smith, K. M., Hill, R. S., Gold, B., Halpern, M., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20 · Cited by 2,639
Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe
Linder, E. V. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.091301 · Cited by 2,526
ACCELERATING UNIVERSES WITH SCALING DARK MATTER
CHEVALLIER, M., & POLARSKI, D. (2001) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271801000822 · Cited by 2,490
Riess, A. G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., Macri, L. M., & Scolnic, D. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1422 · Cited by 2,201 · cited 2×
“Cepheids-SN Ia: we average the H0 measurements from Riess et al. 2019 [4], H0 = 74.03± 1.42 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, Burns et al. 2018 [77], H0 = 73.2 ± 2.3 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, Freedman et al. 2012 [78], H0 = 74.3 ± 2.1 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, and we use the smallest error bar of the ar X iv :2 01 1.”
InfluentialTensions between the early and late Universe
Verde, L., Treu, T., & Riess, A. G. (2019) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0 · Cited by 1,380 · cited 1×
“…± 2.50 Reid, Pesce, Riess 2019 [82] 71.1 ± 1.9 Huang et al. 2019 [83] 73.3 ± 4.0 Pesce et al. 2019 [84] 73.9 ± 3.0 Kourkchi et al. 2020 [85] 76.00 ± 2.55 Schombert et al. 2020 [86] 75.1 ± 2.75 Verde et al. 2019 [5] 75.4 ± 4.0 Khetan et al. 2020 [87] 70.5 ± 4.1 de Jaeger et al. 2020 [88]…”
InfluentialA gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. M. C., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24471 · Cited by 1,201
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Aiola, 2020, JCAP, 33
- Freedman, 2020, ApJ, 33
- Green, 2019, BAAS, 51, 159
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–136 of 136
Explaining JWST star formation history at z∼17 by modifying ΛCDM
Sokoliuk, O. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553903 · Cited by 7
Mass-varying dark matter from a phase transition
Mandal, S., & Sehgal, N. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.123003 · Cited by 7
Forconi, M., & Valentino, E. D. (2025) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101904 · Cited by 7
ΛsCDM cosmology from a type-II minimally modified gravity
Akarsu, Ö., Felice, A. D., Valentino, E. D., Kumar, S., Nunes, R. C., Özülker, E., Vazquez, J. A., & Yadav, A. (2026) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 5
Challenges to a sharp change in G as a solution to the Hubble tension
Banik, I., Desmond, H., & Samaras, N. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf567 · Cited by 5
A varying dark energy effective speed of sound parameter in the phantom Universe
Albarran, I., Bouhmadi-López, M., & Marto, J. (2021) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09546-2 · Cited by 5
High-redshift galaxies from JWST observations in more realistic dark matter halo models
Fakhry, S., Salmani, R. V., & Firouzjaee, J. T. (2025) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/9cmb-kf3x · Cited by 4
Wave correlations and quantum noise in cosmology
Leonhardt, U. (2023) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/acb027 · Cited by 4
“The theory [5, 6, 7] is still mostly a hypothesis, but it appears to agree with astronomical data [7] and seems to resolve [7] a major inconsistency in the conventional interpretation of that data [35]: the 5σ tension between the directly measured Hubble constant [36] and the Hubble constant inferred from the Cosmic M…”
BackgroundHong, W., Jiao, K., Wang, Y.-C., Zhang, T., & Zhang, T.-J. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acf654 · Cited by 4
Mimetic Weyl geometric gravity
Vișa, D.-I., Harko, T., & Shahidi, S. (2024) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101720 · Cited by 3
Copernican Paradigm beyond FLRW
Krishnan, C., Mondol, R., & Sheikh-Jabbari, M. M. (2023) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym15020428 · Cited by 3
Thompson, R. I. (2023) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe9040172 · Cited by 3
Wang, H., & Yun-song Piao, A. (2024) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138914 · Cited by 3
Pal, S., & Saha, R. (2024) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ad804d · Cited by 3
“The density parameters estimated by ParamANN indicate the spatially flat ΛCDM Universe which is consistent with the results of Planck collaboration [1].”
BackgroundResultMercier, C. (2021) · Journal of Modern Physics · doi:10.4236/jmp.2021.1212098 · Cited by 3
The Dark Sector and the Standard Model from a Local Generalisation of Extra DimensionsPreprint
Jackson, D. J. (2021) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202109.0512.v1 · Cited by 3
“9σ evidence for a phantom dark energy equation of state’ in a manner that considerably alleviates the Hubble tension [89].”
BackgroundThe state of the dark energy equation of state circa 2023Preprint
Escamilla, L. A., Giarè, W., Valentino, E. D., Nunes, R. C., & Vagnozzi, S. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.14802 · Cited by 3
“[232] and tables II–VI in ref.”
Liu, W., Wu, Y., Pan, S., & Yang, W. (2025) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100403 · Cited by 2
Schiavone, T., Angelis, M. D., Escamilla, L. A., Montani, G., & Valentino, E. D. (2026) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/bqwg-ff57 · Cited by 2
A Review on Resolving the Hubble Tension via Late-Universe Physics
Jia, X.-D., Dai, X.-Y., Yang, Y., & Wang, F. Y. (2026) · Galaxies · doi:10.3390/galaxies14030055 · Cited by 2
Observational constraints of diffusive dark-fluid cosmology
Sahlu, S., Mukhopadhyay, U., Mekuria, R. R., & Abebe, A. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1921 · Cited by 6
Nieuwenhuizen, T. M., Limousin, M., & Morandi, A. (2021) · The European Physical Journal Special Topics · doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00101-4 · Cited by 2
On model independent cosmic determinations of $H_0$Preprint
Colgáin, E. Ó., & Sheikh-Jabbari, M. M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 2
Exploring the Growth Index $γ_L$: Insights from Different CMB Dataset Combinations and ApproachesPreprint
Specogna, E., Valentino, E. D., Said, J. L., & Nguyen, N.-M. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.16865 · Cited by 2
Observed Hubble constant is consistent with physics of the quantum vacuumPreprint
Leonhardt, U., & Berechya, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 2
A double take on early and interacting dark energy from JWSTPreprint
Forconi, M., Giarè, W., Mena, O., Ruchika, R., Valentino, E. D., MELCHIORRI, A., & Nunes, R. C. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.11074
Early Galaxy Formation and the Hubble Constant Tension
McGaugh, S. (2023) · doi:10.59350/tcypx-cjr90
The Hubble Tension, Book Prologue: A Perspective Along Several Axes
Riess, A. G. (2024) · Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-0177-7_1
(Introduction to the Second Part of the Book) What About the Solutions?
Valentino, E. D. (2024) · Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-0177-7_20
An Analytical Model for Cosmology with a Single Input, the Redshift
Mostaghel, N. (2024) · American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.11648/j.ajaa.20241102.12
Cosmological dynamics of FRW universe in presence of tachyonic field
Singha, A. K., Sardar, A., Debnath, U., & Pradhan, A. (2024) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ad9e3b
Unifying early and late dark energy: dynamical requirements and obstructions
Giarè, W., & Sakstein, J. (2026) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/09/096 · Cited by 1
Crunching, bouncing, and cyclical cosmologies from dark sector interactions
van der Westhuizen, M. A., & Abebe, A. (2026) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ae849d
Ćirković, M. M., & Perović, S. (2026) · The European Physical Journal H · doi:10.1140/epjh/s13129-026-00122-4
“These circumstances reveal another important motivation for studying q 0 : our very much alive quest to understand dark energy or what is occasionally and somewhat pompously called “the dark energy sector” of cosmology (e.g., Turner 2018; Di Valentino 2021; Menci et al. 2024).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Di Valentino, E.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-01-22
- Volume
- 502
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 2065-2073
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W3097756562
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27
- FWCI
- 14.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Institute of Advanced Study, Durham University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Keywords
- Hubble constant, Hubble tension, dark energy, masers, Tully-Fisher relation, surface brightness fluctuations, Type II supernovae, standard sirens, gamma-ray attenuation, phantom dark energy, wCDM model, w0waCDM, interacting dark energy, cosmological constant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
