Self-consistent modelling of the Milky Way’s nuclear stellar disc
Open accessAbstract
The nuclear stellar disc (NSD) is a flattened high-density stellar structure that dominates the gravitational field of the Milky Way at Galactocentric radius $30\, {\rm pc}\lesssim R\lesssim 300\, {\rm pc}$. We construct axisymmetric self-consistent equilibrium dynamical models of the NSD in which the distribution function is an analytic function of the action variables. We fit the models to the normalized kinematic distributions (line-of-sight velocities + VIRAC2 proper motions) of stars in the NSD survey of Fritz et al., taking the foreground contamination due to the Galactic Bar explicitly into account using an N-body model. The posterior marginalized probability distributions give a total mass of $M_{\rm NSD} = 10.5^{+1.1}_{-1.0} \times 10^8 \, \, \rm M_\odot$, roughly exponential radial and vertical scale lengths of $R_{\rm disc} = 88.6^{+9.2}_{-6.9} \, {\rm pc}$ and $H_{\rm disc}=28.4^{+5.5}_{-5.5} \, {\rm pc}$, respectively, and a velocity dispersion $\sigma \simeq 70\, {\rm km\, s^{-1}}$ that decreases with radius. We find that the assumption that the NSD is axisymmetric provides a good representation of the data. We quantify contamination from the Galactic Bar in the sample, which is substantial in most observed fields. Our models provide the full 6D (position + velocity) distribution function of the NSD, which can be used to generate predictions for future surveys. We make the models publicly available as part of the software package agama.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This rate of star formation and time scale are consistent with the expected amplitude and periodicity of star formation at the CMZ.
“Note that this rate of star formation and the time scale are consistent with the expected amplitude and periodicity of star formation at the CMZ (Krumholz et al. 2017; Armillotta et al. 2019, 2020; Sormani et al. 2022).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Sormani et al. 2022
Cites
Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition
Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. (2008) · doi:10.1515/9781400828722 · Cited by 4,375 · see citing works
The existence and shapes of dust lanes in galactic bars
Athanassoula, E. (1992) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/259.2.345 · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
THE GALACTIC CENTER ENVIRONMENT
Morris, M., & Serabyn, E. (1996) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.645 · Cited by 930 · see citing works
Portail, M., Gerhard, O., Wegg, C., & Ness, M. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2819 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Self-citationMolinari, S., Bally, J., Noriega-Crespo, A., Compiègne, M., Bernard, J. P., Paradis, D., Martin, P., Testi, L., Barlow, M., Moore, T., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/735/2/l33 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
What controls star formation in the central 500 pc of the Galaxy?
Kruijssen, J. M. D., Longmore, S. N., Elmegreen, B. G., Murray, N., Bally, J., Testi, L., & Kennicutt, R. C. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu494 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Fritz, T. K., Battaglia, G., Pawlowski, M. S., Kallivayalil, N., van der Marel, R., Sohn, S. T., Brook, C., & Besla, G. (2018) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833343 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Self-citationStar formation rates and efficiencies in the Galactic Centre
Barnes, A. T., Longmore, S. N., Battersby, C., Bally, J., Kruijssen, J. M. D., Henshaw, J. D., & Walker, D. L. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx941 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
A review of action estimation methods for galactic dynamics
Sanders, J. L., & Binney, J. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw106 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way
Sarkar, K. C. (2024) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00152-1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Note that this rate of star formation and the time scale are consistent with the expected amplitude and periodicity of star formation at the CMZ (Krumholz et al. 2017; Armillotta et al. 2019, 2020; Sormani et al. 2022).”
Result
- Authors
- Sormani, M. C., Sanders, J. L., Fritz, T. K., Smith, L. C., Gerhard, O., Schödel, R., Magorrian, J., Neumayer, N., Nogueras-Lara, F., Feldmeier-Krause, A., Mastrobuono-Battisti, A., Schultheis, M., Shahzamanian, B., Vasiliev, E., Klessen, R. S., Lucas, P., & Minniti, D.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (DE)
- Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia (CSIC), Glorieta de la Astronomia s/n, E-18008 Granada, Spain
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (ES)
- University of Hertfordshire (GB)
- Universidad Andrés Bello (CL)
- Corresponding author
- Sormani, Mattia C
- ORCID
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-03-22
- Volume
- 512
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1857-1884
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W3217713482
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- IrInSubria (University of Insubria) (submittedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- ERC (855130)
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/S000488/I)
- DFG (INST 35/1134-1 FUGG)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Keywords
- nuclear stellar disc, Milky Way, axisymmetric equilibrium, kinematic distributions, proper motions, radial velocity, N-body simulations, disk mass, scale length, velocity dispersion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review