Cited by 77Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

Self-consistent modelling of the Milky Way’s nuclear stellar disc

Open access
Sormani, Mattia C, Sanders, Jason L, Fritz, Tobias K, Smith, Leigh C, Gerhard, Ortwin, Schödel, Rainer, Magorrian, John, Neumayer, Nadine +9 more·2022·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

The nuclear stellar disc (NSD) is a flattened high-density stellar structure that dominates the gravitational field of the Milky Way at Galactocentric radius $30\, {\rm pc}\lesssim R\lesssim 300\, {\rm pc}$. We construct axisymmetric self-consistent equilibrium dynamical models of the NSD in which the distribution function is an analytic function of the action variables. We fit the models to the normalized kinematic distributions (line-of-sight velocities + VIRAC2 proper motions) of stars in the NSD survey of Fritz et al., taking the foreground contamination due to the Galactic Bar explicitly into account using an N-body model. The posterior marginalized probability distributions give a total mass of $M_{\rm NSD} = 10.5^{+1.1}_{-1.0} \times 10^8 \, \, \rm M_\odot$, roughly exponential radial and vertical scale lengths of $R_{\rm disc} = 88.6^{+9.2}_{-6.9} \, {\rm pc}$ and $H_{\rm disc}=28.4^{+5.5}_{-5.5} \, {\rm pc}$, respectively, and a velocity dispersion $\sigma \simeq 70\, {\rm km\, s^{-1}}$ that decreases with radius. We find that the assumption that the NSD is axisymmetric provides a good representation of the data. We quantify contamination from the Galactic Bar in the sample, which is substantial in most observed fields. Our models provide the full 6D (position + velocity) distribution function of the NSD, which can be used to generate predictions for future surveys. We make the models publicly available as part of the software package agama.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stac639

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This rate of star formation and time scale are consistent with the expected amplitude and periodicity of star formation at the CMZ.

    “Note that this rate of star formation and the time scale are consistent with the expected amplitude and periodicity of star formation at the CMZ (Krumholz et al. 2017; Armillotta et al. 2019, 2020; Sormani et al. 2022).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Sormani et al. 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sormani, M. C., Sanders, J. L., Fritz, T. K., Smith, L. C., Gerhard, O., Schödel, R., Magorrian, J., Neumayer, N., Nogueras-Lara, F., Feldmeier-Krause, A., Mastrobuono-Battisti, A., Schultheis, M., Shahzamanian, B., Vasiliev, E., Klessen, R. S., Lucas, P., & Minniti, D.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (DE)
  • Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia (CSIC), Glorieta de la Astronomia s/n, E-18008 Granada, Spain
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (ES)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
  • Universidad Andrés Bello (CL)
Corresponding author
Sormani, Mattia C
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2022-03-22
Volume
512
Issue
2
Pages
1857-1884
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W3217713482
Cited by
77
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • IrInSubria (University of Insubria) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • ERC (855130)
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/S000488/I)
  • DFG (INST 35/1134-1 FUGG)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
nuclear stellar disc, Milky Way, axisymmetric equilibrium, kinematic distributions, proper motions, radial velocity, N-body simulations, disk mass, scale length, velocity dispersion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review