Cited by 17Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

The Concentration–Mass relation of massive, dynamically relaxed galaxy clusters: agreement between observations and ΛCDM simulations

Open access
Darragh-Ford, Elise, Mantz, Adam B, Rasia, Elena, Allen, Steven W, Morris, R Glenn, Foster, Jack, Schmidt, Robert W, Wenrich, Guillermo·2023·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

The relationship linking a galaxy cluster’s total mass with the concentration of its mass profile and its redshift is a fundamental prediction of the Cold Dark Matter (CDM) paradigm of cosmic structure formation. However, confronting those predictions with observations is complicated by the fact that simulated clusters are not representative of observed samples where detailed mass profile constraints are possible. In this work, we calculate the symmetry-peakiness-alignment (SPA) morphology metrics for maps of X-ray emissivity from the three hundred project hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters at four redshifts, and thereby select a sample of morphologically relaxed, simulated clusters, using observational criteria. These clusters have on average earlier formation times than the full sample, confirming that they are both morphologically and dynamically more relaxed than typical. We constrain the concentration–mass–redshift relation of both the relaxed and complete sample of simulated clusters, assuming power-law dependences on mass (κm) and 1 + z (κζ), finding κm = −0.12 ± 0.07 and κζ = −0.27 ± 0.19 for the relaxed subsample. From an equivalently selected sample of massive, relaxed clusters observed with Chandra, we find κm = −0.12 ± 0.08 and κζ = −0.48 ± 0.19, in good agreement with the simulation predictions. The simulated and observed samples also agree well on the average concentration at a pivot mass and redshift providing further validation of the ΛCDM paradigm in the properties of the largest gravitationally collapsed structures observed. This also represents the first clear detection of decreasing concentration with redshift, a longstanding prediction of simulations in data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stad585

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Amodeo S., Ettori S., Capasso R., Sereno M., 2016, A&A, 590, A126 · DOI
  2. Ansarifard S., et al., 2020, A&A, 634, A113 · DOI
  3. Asplund M., Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., Scott P., 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Buote D. A., Tsai J. C., 1995, ApJ, 452, 522 · DOI
  5. Campitiello M. G., et al., 2022, A&A, 665, A117 · DOI
  6. Cao K., Barnes D. J., Vogelsberger M., 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 503, 3394-3413 · DOI
  7. H. L., Habib S., Heitmann K., Frontiere N., Finkel H., Pope A., Morozov V., 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 859, 55 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Cui W., et al., 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480, 2898-2915 · DOI
  9. De Luca F., De Petris M., Yepes G., Cui W., Knebe A., Rasia E., 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 504, 5383-5400 · DOI
  10. Dolag K., Hansen F. K., Roncarelli M., Moscardini L., 2005, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 363, 29-39 · DOI
  11. Du W., Fan Z., Shan H., Zhao G.-B., Covone G., Fu L., Kneib J.-P., 2015, ApJ, 814, 120 · DOI
  12. Dutton A. A., Macciò A. V., 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 441, 3359 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gao L., Navarro J. F., Cole S., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., Springel V., Jenkins A., Neto A. F., 2008, MNRAS, 387, 536 · DOI
  14. Jeltema T. E., Canizares C. R., Bautz M. W., Buote D. A., 2005, ApJ, 624, 606 · DOI
  15. Klypin A., Yepes G., Gottlöber S., Prada F., Heß S., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 4340 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Li Q., et al., 2020, MNRAS, 495, 2930 · DOI
  17. Ludlow A. D., Navarro J. F., Li M., Angulo R. E., Boylan-Kolchin M., Bett P. E., 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1322 · DOI
  18. Mantz A. B., Allen S. W., Morris R. G., Rapetti D. A., Applegate D. E., Kelly P. L., von der Linden A., Schmidt R. W., 2014, MNRAS, 440, 2077 · DOI
  19. Mantz A. B., Allen S. W., Morris R. G., Schmidt R. W., von der Linden A., Urban O., 2015, MNRAS, 449, 199 · DOI
  20. Mantz A. B., Allen S. W., Morris R. G., Schmidt R. W., 2016a, MNRAS, 456, 4020 · DOI
  21. Mantz A. B., Allen S. W., Morris R. G., 2016b, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 462, 681 · DOI
  22. Mantz A. B., et al., 2022, MNRAS, 510, 131 · DOI
  23. McDonald M., et al., 2017, ApJ, 843, 28 · DOI
  24. Meneghetti M., et al., 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 797, 34 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Merten J., et al., 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 806, 4 · DOI
  26. Mohr J. J., Fabricant D. G., Geller M. J., 1993, ApJ, 413, 492 · DOI
  27. Navarro J. F., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1997, ApJ, 490, 493 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Navarro J. F., et al., 2004, MNRAS, 349, 1039 · DOI
  29. Nurgaliev D., McDonald M., Benson B. A., Miller E. D., Stubbs C. W., Vikhlinin A., 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 779, 112 · DOI
  30. Okabe N., Smith G. P., Umetsu K., Takada M., Futamase T., 2013, ApJ, 769, L35 · DOI
  31. Rasia E., Meneghetti M., Ettori S., 2013, The Astronomical Review, 8, 40 · DOI
  32. Rossetti M., Gastaldello F., Eckert D., Torre M. D., Pantiri G., Cazzoletti P., Molendi S., 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 468, 1917 · DOI
  33. Santos J. S., Rosati P., Tozzi P., Böhringer H., Ettori S., Bignamini A., 2008, A&A, 483, 35-47 · DOI
  34. Sayers J., Mantz A. B., Rasia E., Allen S. W., Cui W., Golwala S. R., Mor- ris R. G., Wan J. T., 2022, The Evolution and Mass Dependence of Galaxy Cluster Pressure Profiles at 0.05 ≤ 𝑧 ≤ 0.60 and 4 × 10 14 M ≤ M 500 ≤ 30 × 10 14 M , doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2206.00091, https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.00091 · DOI
  35. Schmidt R. W., Allen S. W., 2007, MNRAS, 379, 209 · DOI
  36. Shan H., et al., 2017, ApJ, 840, 104 · DOI
  37. Vikhlinin A., Kravtsov A., Forman W., Jones C., Markevitch M., Murray S. S., Van Speybroeck L., 2006, ApJ, 640, 691 · DOI
  38. Vikhlinin A., Burenin R., Forman W. R., Jones C., Hornstrup A., Murray S. S., Quintana H., 2007, in Böhringer H., Pratt G. W., Finoguenov A., Schuecker P., eds, Heating versus Cooling in Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies. p. 48 (arXiv:astro-ph/0611438), doi:10.1007/978-3-540- 73484-0_9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Darragh-Ford, E., Mantz, A. B., Rasia, E., Allen, S. W., Morris, R. G., Foster, J., Schmidt, R. W., & Wenrich, G.
Affiliations
  • SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
  • Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (US)
  • Trieste Astronomical Observatory (IT)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Darragh-Ford, Elise
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2023-02-23
Volume
521
Issue
1
Pages
790-799
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W4321605036
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS8-03060)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-76SF00515)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
galaxy clusters, concentration-mass relation, cluster mass profiles, Chandra X-ray observations, fluid simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review