The Concentration–Mass relation of massive, dynamically relaxed galaxy clusters: agreement between observations and ΛCDM simulations
Open accessAbstract
The relationship linking a galaxy cluster’s total mass with the concentration of its mass profile and its redshift is a fundamental prediction of the Cold Dark Matter (CDM) paradigm of cosmic structure formation. However, confronting those predictions with observations is complicated by the fact that simulated clusters are not representative of observed samples where detailed mass profile constraints are possible. In this work, we calculate the symmetry-peakiness-alignment (SPA) morphology metrics for maps of X-ray emissivity from the three hundred project hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters at four redshifts, and thereby select a sample of morphologically relaxed, simulated clusters, using observational criteria. These clusters have on average earlier formation times than the full sample, confirming that they are both morphologically and dynamically more relaxed than typical. We constrain the concentration–mass–redshift relation of both the relaxed and complete sample of simulated clusters, assuming power-law dependences on mass (κm) and 1 + z (κζ), finding κm = −0.12 ± 0.07 and κζ = −0.27 ± 0.19 for the relaxed subsample. From an equivalently selected sample of massive, relaxed clusters observed with Chandra, we find κm = −0.12 ± 0.08 and κζ = −0.48 ± 0.19, in good agreement with the simulation predictions. The simulated and observed samples also agree well on the average concentration at a pivot mass and redshift providing further validation of the ΛCDM paradigm in the properties of the largest gravitationally collapsed structures observed. This also represents the first clear detection of decreasing concentration with redshift, a longstanding prediction of simulations in data.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dynamically relaxed halos are expected to have higher concentrations.
“Additionally, dynamically relaxed halos are expected to have higher concentrations [83-85]; our result on c 200m may be further evidence of MACSJ0138's relaxed state.”
From Constraint on dark matter self-interaction from combined strong lensing and stellar kinematics in MACS J0138-2155 (2026) · cites this paper as [85]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Amodeo S., Ettori S., Capasso R., Sereno M., 2016, A&A, 590, A126 · DOI
- Ansarifard S., et al., 2020, A&A, 634, A113 · DOI
- Asplund M., Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., Scott P., 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481 · DOI · Paper page
- Buote D. A., Tsai J. C., 1995, ApJ, 452, 522 · DOI
- Campitiello M. G., et al., 2022, A&A, 665, A117 · DOI
- Cao K., Barnes D. J., Vogelsberger M., 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 503, 3394-3413 · DOI
- H. L., Habib S., Heitmann K., Frontiere N., Finkel H., Pope A., Morozov V., 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 859, 55 · DOI · Paper page
- Cui W., et al., 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480, 2898-2915 · DOI
- De Luca F., De Petris M., Yepes G., Cui W., Knebe A., Rasia E., 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 504, 5383-5400 · DOI
- Dolag K., Hansen F. K., Roncarelli M., Moscardini L., 2005, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 363, 29-39 · DOI
- Du W., Fan Z., Shan H., Zhao G.-B., Covone G., Fu L., Kneib J.-P., 2015, ApJ, 814, 120 · DOI
- Dutton A. A., Macciò A. V., 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 441, 3359 · DOI · Paper page
- Gao L., Navarro J. F., Cole S., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., Springel V., Jenkins A., Neto A. F., 2008, MNRAS, 387, 536 · DOI
- Jeltema T. E., Canizares C. R., Bautz M. W., Buote D. A., 2005, ApJ, 624, 606 · DOI
- Klypin A., Yepes G., Gottlöber S., Prada F., Heß S., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 4340 · DOI · Paper page
- Li Q., et al., 2020, MNRAS, 495, 2930 · DOI
- Ludlow A. D., Navarro J. F., Li M., Angulo R. E., Boylan-Kolchin M., Bett P. E., 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1322 · DOI
- Mantz A. B., Allen S. W., Morris R. G., Rapetti D. A., Applegate D. E., Kelly P. L., von der Linden A., Schmidt R. W., 2014, MNRAS, 440, 2077 · DOI
- Mantz A. B., Allen S. W., Morris R. G., Schmidt R. W., von der Linden A., Urban O., 2015, MNRAS, 449, 199 · DOI
- Mantz A. B., Allen S. W., Morris R. G., Schmidt R. W., 2016a, MNRAS, 456, 4020 · DOI
- Mantz A. B., Allen S. W., Morris R. G., 2016b, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 462, 681 · DOI
- Mantz A. B., et al., 2022, MNRAS, 510, 131 · DOI
- McDonald M., et al., 2017, ApJ, 843, 28 · DOI
- Meneghetti M., et al., 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 797, 34 · DOI · Paper page
- Merten J., et al., 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 806, 4 · DOI
- Mohr J. J., Fabricant D. G., Geller M. J., 1993, ApJ, 413, 492 · DOI
- Navarro J. F., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1997, ApJ, 490, 493 · DOI · Paper page
- Navarro J. F., et al., 2004, MNRAS, 349, 1039 · DOI
- Nurgaliev D., McDonald M., Benson B. A., Miller E. D., Stubbs C. W., Vikhlinin A., 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 779, 112 · DOI
- Okabe N., Smith G. P., Umetsu K., Takada M., Futamase T., 2013, ApJ, 769, L35 · DOI
- Rasia E., Meneghetti M., Ettori S., 2013, The Astronomical Review, 8, 40 · DOI
- Rossetti M., Gastaldello F., Eckert D., Torre M. D., Pantiri G., Cazzoletti P., Molendi S., 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 468, 1917 · DOI
- Santos J. S., Rosati P., Tozzi P., Böhringer H., Ettori S., Bignamini A., 2008, A&A, 483, 35-47 · DOI
- Sayers J., Mantz A. B., Rasia E., Allen S. W., Cui W., Golwala S. R., Mor- ris R. G., Wan J. T., 2022, The Evolution and Mass Dependence of Galaxy Cluster Pressure Profiles at 0.05 ≤ 𝑧 ≤ 0.60 and 4 × 10 14 M ≤ M 500 ≤ 30 × 10 14 M , doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2206.00091, https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.00091 · DOI
- Schmidt R. W., Allen S. W., 2007, MNRAS, 379, 209 · DOI
- Shan H., et al., 2017, ApJ, 840, 104 · DOI
- Vikhlinin A., Kravtsov A., Forman W., Jones C., Markevitch M., Murray S. S., Van Speybroeck L., 2006, ApJ, 640, 691 · DOI
- Vikhlinin A., Burenin R., Forman W. R., Jones C., Hornstrup A., Murray S. S., Quintana H., 2007, in Böhringer H., Pratt G. W., Finoguenov A., Schuecker P., eds, Heating versus Cooling in Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies. p. 48 (arXiv:astro-ph/0611438), doi:10.1007/978-3-540- 73484-0_9 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
O’Donnell, J. H., Jeltema, T. E., Roberts, M. G., Nightingale, J., Flowers, A., & Aldas, D. (2026) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/hfgd-245k · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Darragh-Ford, E., Mantz, A. B., Rasia, E., Allen, S. W., Morris, R. G., Foster, J., Schmidt, R. W., & Wenrich, G.
- Affiliations
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
- Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (US)
- Trieste Astronomical Observatory (IT)
- Stanford University (US)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Darragh-Ford, Elise
- ORCID
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-02-23
- Volume
- 521
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 790-799
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W4321605036
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS8-03060)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-76SF00515)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- galaxy clusters, concentration-mass relation, cluster mass profiles, Chandra X-ray observations, fluid simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review