Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The electromagnetic signals of compact binary mergers

Open access
Piran, T., Nakar, E., Rosswog, S.·2013·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Compact binary mergers are prime sources of gravitational waves (GWs), targeted by current and next generation detectors. The question ‘what is the observable electromagnetic (EM) signature of a compact binary merger?’ is an intriguing one with crucial consequences to the quest for GWs. We present a large set of numerical simulations that focus on the EM signals that emerge from the dynamically ejected subrelativistic material. These outflows produce on a time-scale of a day macronovae – short-lived infrared (IR) to ultraviolet (UV) signals powered by radioactive decay. Like in regular supernovae the interaction of this outflow with the surrounding matter inevitably leads to a long-lasting remnant. We calculate the expected radio signals of these remnants on time-scales longer than a year, when the subrelativistic ejecta dominate the emission. We discuss their detectability in 1.4 GHz and 150 MHz and compare it with an updated estimate of the detectability of short gamma-ray bursts’ orphan afterglows (which are produced by a different component of this outflow). We find that mergers with characteristics similar to those of the Galactic neutron star binary population (similar masses and typical circummerger Galactic disc density of ∼1 cm−3) that take place at the detection horizon of advanced GW detectors (300 Mpc) yield 1.4 GHz [150 MHz] signals of ∼50 [300] μJy, for several years. The signal on time-scales of weeks is dominated by the mildly and/or ultrarelativistic outflow, which is not accounted for by our simulations, and is expected to be even brighter. Upcoming all sky surveys are expected to detect a few dozen, and possibly more, merger remnants at any given time thereby providing robust lower limits to the mergers rate even before the advanced GW detectors become operational. The macronovae signals from the same distance peak in the IR to UV range at an observed magnitude that may be as bright as 22–23 about 10 h after the merger but dimmer, redder and longer if the opacity is larger.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stt037

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Piran, T., Nakar, E., & Rosswog, S.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2013-02-14
Volume
430
Issue
3
Pages
2121-2136
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2050838288
Cited by
280
References
3
FWCI
19.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The electromagnetic signals of compact binary mergers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stt037
The paper
Piran, T., Nakar, E., & Rosswog, S. (2013). The electromagnetic signals of compact binary mergers. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt037

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.