Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The abundance of (not just) dark matter haloes

Open access
Sawala, Till, Frenk, Carlos S., Crain, Robert A., Jenkins, Adrian, Schaye, Joop, Theuns, Tom, Zavala, Jesus·2013·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We study the effect of baryons on the abundance of structures and substructures in a Λ cold dark matter (CDM) cosmology, using a pair of high-resolution cosmological simulations from the Galaxies-Intergalactic Medium Interaction Calculation project. Both simulations use identical initial conditions, but while one contains only dark matter, the other also includes baryons. We find that gas pressure, reionization, supernova feedback, stripping and truncated accretion systematically reduce the total mass and the abundance of structures below ∼1012 M⊙ compared to the pure dark matter simulation. Taking this into account and adopting an appropriate detection threshold lower the abundance of observed galaxies with maximum circular velocities vmax < 100 km s−1, significantly reducing the reported discrepancy between ΛCDM and the measured H i velocity function of the Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA survey. We also show that the stellar-to-total mass ratios of galaxies with stellar masses of ∼105–107 M⊙ inferred from abundance matching of the (sub)halo mass function to the observed galaxy mass function increase by a factor of ∼2. In addition, we find that an important fraction of low-mass subhaloes are completely devoid of stars. Accounting for the presence of dark subhaloes below 1010 M⊙ further reduces the abundance of observable objects and leads to an additional increase in the inferred stellar-to-total mass ratio by factors of 2–10 for galaxies in haloes of 109–1010 M⊙. This largely reconciles the abundance matching results with the kinematics of individual dwarf galaxies in ΛCDM. We propose approximate corrections to the masses of objects derived from pure dark matter calculations to account for baryonic effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stt259

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Sawala, T., Frenk, C. S., Crain, R. A., Jenkins, A., Schaye, J., Theuns, T., & Zavala, J.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2013-03-09
Volume
431
Issue
2
Pages
1366-1382
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2117264301
Cited by
161
References
7
FWCI
11.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The abundance of (not just) dark matter haloes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stt259
The paper
Sawala, T., Frenk, C. S., Crain, R. A., Jenkins, A., Schaye, J., Theuns, T., & Zavala, J. (2013). The abundance of (not just) dark matter haloes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt259

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.