The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ARGOS – IV. The kinematics of the Milky Way bulge
Open accessAbstract
We present the kinematic results from our ARGOS spectroscopic survey of the Galactic bulge of the Milky Way. Our aim is to understand the formation of the Galactic bulge. We examine the kinematics of about 17 400 stars in the bulge located within 3.5 kpc of the Galactic Centre, identified from the 28 000 star ARGOS survey. We aim to determine if the formation of the bulge has been internally driven from disc instabilities as suggested by its boxy shape, or if mergers have played a significant role as expected from lambda cold dark matter simulations. From our velocity measurements across latitudes b = −5°, − 7|${^{\circ}_{.}}$|5 and −10° we find the bulge to be a cylindrically rotating system that transitions smoothly out into the disc. From observations of 3 fields at b = +10, the kinematics of the bulge show North-South symmetry about the major axis. Within the bulge, we find a kinematically distinct metal-poor population ([Fe/H] < −1.0) that is not rotating cylindrically. The 5 per cent of our stars with [Fe/H] < −1.0 are a slowly rotating spheroidal population, which we believe are stars of the metal-weak thick disc and halo which presently lie in the inner Galaxy. The kinematics of the two bulge components that we identified in ARGOS Paper III (mean [Fe/H] ≈ −0.25 and [Fe/H] ≈ +0.15, respectively) demonstrate that they are likely to share a common formation origin and are distinct from the more metal-poor populations of the thick disc and halo which are co-located inside the bulge. We do not exclude an underlying merger generated bulge component but our results favour bulge formation from instabilities in the early thin disc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Catalog of Parameters for Globular Clusters in the Milky Way
Harris, W. E. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/118116 · Cited by 4,500
Tumlinson, J. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/708/2/1398 · Cited by 223
Cited by
The Galaxy in Context: Structural, Kinematic, and Integrated Properties
Bland-Hawthorn, J., & Gerhard, O. (2016) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441 · Cited by 1,656
Self-citationCosmic structure as the quantum interference of a coherent dark wave
Schive, H.-Y., Chiueh, T., & Broadhurst, T. (2014) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2996 · Cited by 930
The gravitational force field of the Galaxy measured from the kinematics of RR Lyrae in Gaia
Wegg, C., Gerhard, O., & Bieth, M. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz572 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Ness, M., Freeman, K., Athanassoula, E., Wylie-de-Boer, E., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Asplund, M., Lewis, G. F., Yong, D., Lane, R. R., Kiss, L. L., & Ibata, R.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-05-14
- Volume
- 432
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2092-2103
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2107297926
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ARGOS – IV. The kinematics of the Milky Way bulge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stt533
- The paper
- Ness, M., Freeman, K., Athanassoula, E., Wylie-de-Boer, E., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Asplund, M., Lewis, G. F., Yong, D., Lane, R. R., Kiss, L. L., & Ibata, R. (2013). ARGOS – IV. The kinematics of the Milky Way bulge. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt533
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.