The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TPZ: photometric redshift PDFs and ancillary information by using prediction trees and random forests
Open accessAbstract
With the growth of large photometric surveys, accurately estimating photometric redshifts, preferably as a probability density function (PDF), and fully understanding the implicit systematic uncertainties in this process, has become increasingly important. In this paper, we present a new, publicly available, parallel, machine learning algorithm that generates photometric redshift PDFs by using prediction trees and random forest techniques, which we have named TPZ.1 This new algorithm incorporates measurement errors into the calculation while also dealing efficiently with missing values in the data. In addition, our implementation of this algorithm provides supplementary information regarding the data being analysed, including unbiased estimates of the accuracy of the technique without resorting to a validation data set, identification of poor photometric redshift areas within the parameter space occupied by the spectroscopic training data, a quantification of the relative importance of the variables used to construct the PDF, and a robust identification of outliers. This extra information can be used to optimally target new spectroscopic observations and to improve the overall efficacy of the redshift estimation. We have tested TPZ on galaxy samples drawn from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) main galaxy sample and from the Deep Extragalactic Evolutionary Probe-2 (DEEP2) survey, obtaining excellent results in each case. We also have tested our implementation by participating in the PHAT1 project, which is a blind photometric redshift contest, finding that TPZ performs comparable to if not better than other empirical photometric redshift algorithms. Finally, we discuss the various parameters that control the operation of TPZ, the specific limitations of this approach and an application of photometric redshift PDFs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003
Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x · Cited by 10,500
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, Jr., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., Bakken, J. A., Barkhouser, R., Bastian, S., Berman, E., et al. (2000) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/301513 · Cited by 10,366
Self-citationProceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08
(2008) · doi:10.1145/1390156 · Cited by 6,680
THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY
Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., Allam, S. S., Prieto, C. A., An, D., Anderson, K. S. J., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 · Cited by 5,341
Self-citationBoosting the margin: a new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods
Bartlett, P., Freund, Y., Lee, W. S., & Schapire, R. E. (1998) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1024691352 · Cited by 2,306
The Keck Low-Resolution Imaging Spectrometer
Oke, J. B., Cohen, J. G., Carr, M., Cromer, J., Dingizian, A., Harris, F. H., Labrecque, S., Lucinio, R., Schaal, W., Epps, H., et al. (1995) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/133562 · Cited by 2,099
Spectroscopic Target Selection in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The Main Galaxy Sample
Strauss, M. A., Weinberg, D. H., Lupton, R. H., Narayanan, V. K., Annis, J., Bernardi, M., Blanton, M., Burles, S., Connolly, A. J., Dalcanton, J., et al. (2002) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/342343 · Cited by 1,909
Accurate photometric redshifts for the CFHT legacy survey calibrated using the VIMOS VLT deep survey
Ilbert, O., Arnouts, S., McCracken, H. J., Bolzonella, M., Bertin, E., Le Fèvre, O., Mellier, Y., Zamorani, G., Pellò, R., Iovino, A., et al. (2006) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065138 · Cited by 1,683
Cited by
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview
(2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 · Cited by 1,019
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Catalog: Sixteenth Data Release
Lyke, B. W., Higley, A. N., McLane, J. N., Schurhammer, D. P., Myers, A. D., Ross, A. J., Dawson, K., Chabanier, S., Martini, P., Busca, N. G., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aba623 · Cited by 537
Di Valentino, E., Said, J. L., Riess, A., Pollo, A., Poulin, V., Gómez-Valent, A., Weltman, A., Palmese, A., Huang, C. D., Bruck, C. V. D., et al. (2025) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965 · Cited by 319
The many flavours of photometric redshifts
Salvato, M., Ilbert, O., & Hoyle, B. (2018) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0478-0 · Cited by 234
Star–galaxy classification using deep convolutional neural networks
Kim, E. J., & Brunner, R. J. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2672 · Cited by 221
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Carrasco Kind, M., & Brunner, R. J.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-05-01
- Volume
- 432
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1483-1501
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2015990127
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 11.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TPZ: photometric redshift PDFs and ancillary information by using prediction trees and random forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stt574
- The paper
- Carrasco Kind, M., & Brunner, R. J. (2013). TPZ: photometric redshift PDFs and ancillary information by using prediction trees and random forests. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt574
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
