Stellar haloes of simulated Milky-Way-like galaxies: chemical and kinematic properties
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the chemical and kinematic properties of the diffuse stellar haloes of six simulated Milky-Way-like galaxies from the Aquarius Project. Binding energy criteria are adopted to define two dynamically distinct stellar populations: the diffuse inner and outer haloes, which comprise different stellar subpopulations with particular chemical and kinematic characteristics. Our simulated inner- and outer-halo stellar populations have received contributions from debris stars (formed in subgalactic systems while they were outside the virial radius of the main progenitor galaxies) and endo-debris stars (those formed in gas-rich subgalactic systems inside the dark matter haloes of the main progenitor galaxy). The inner haloes possess an additional contribution from disc-heated stars, in the range ∼3–30 per cent, with a mean of ∼20 per cent. Disc-heated stars might exhibit signatures of kinematical support, in particular among the youngest ones. Endo-debris plus disc-heated stars define the so-called in situ stellar populations. In both the inner- and outer-halo stellar populations, we detect contributions from stars with moderate to low [α/Fe] ratios, mainly associated with the endo-debris or disc-heated subpopulations. The observed abundance gradients in the inner-halo regions are influenced by both the level of chemical enrichment and the relative contributions from each stellar subpopulation. Steeper abundance gradients in the inner-halo regions are related to contributions from the disc-heated and endo-debris stars, which tend to be found at lower binding energies than debris stars. In the case of the outer-halo regions, although [Fe/H] gradients are relatively mild, the steeper profiles arise primarily due to contributions from stars formed in more massive satellites, which sink farther into the main halo system, and tend to have higher levels of chemical enrichment and lower energies. Our findings support the existence of (at least) two distinct diffuse stellar halo populations, as suggested by a number of recent observations in the Milky Way and M31. Our results also indicate that a comparison of the range of predicted kinematics, abundance gradients and frequency of [α/Fe]-deficient stars with observations of these quantities in the Milky Way, M31 and other large spirals can both provide clues to improve the modelling of baryonic physics, and reveal detailed information about their likely history of formation and evolution.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
What Norris called the contracted halo is actually largely heated proto-thick disk, formed mostly in situ but in a disk that was heavily dynamically perturbed during a merger.
“We now know from the Gaia DR2 data that what Norris (1994) called the contracted halo is actually largely heated (proto-)thick disk.So it was indeed formed mostly in situ; however, the stars did not form during a collapse but in a disk that was heavily dynamically perturbed during a merger, as in the simulations of Zolotov et al. (2009) and Tissera et al. (2013).”
From Streams, Substructures, and the Early History of the Milky Way (2020) · cites this paper as Tissera et al. 2013
Section 2.2 describes stars formed in a simulated galaxy’s disc and later heated into its inner halo, supporting the in-situ disc-heating part of the comparison. It does not say that a merger caused that heating; disc-heated stars account for about 3–30% of the simulated inner-halo populations, not most of them. The citing authors’ identification of Norris’s population using Gaia data is their own framing, rather than a finding attributed to this 2013 simulation. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Two stellar components in the halo of the Milky Way
Carollo, D., Beers, T. C., Lee, Y. S., Chiba, M., Norris, J. E., Wilhelm, R., Sivarani, T., Marsteller, B., Munn, J. A., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06460 · Cited by 626 · see citing works
Self-citationTHE DUAL ORIGIN OF STELLAR HALOS
Zolotov, A., Willman, B., Brooks, A. M., Governato, F., Brook, C. B., Hogg, D. W., Quinn, T., & Stinson, G. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/702/2/1058 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bland-Hawthorn J., Freeman K. C., 2003, in Perez E., Gonzalez Delgado R. M., Tenorio-Tagle G., eds, ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 297, Star Formation Through Time. Astron. Soc. Pac., San Francisco, p. 457
- Schaye J., 2011, in Galaxy Formation: An International Conference, avail- able at: http://astro.dur.ac.uk/Gal2011
- Thielemann F., Nomoto K., Hashimoto M., 1993, in Prantzos N., Vangioni- Flam E., Casse M., eds, Origin and Evolution of the Elements. Cam- bridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, p. 297
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Galaxy in Context: Structural, Kinematic, and Integrated Properties
Bland-Hawthorn, J., & Gerhard, O. (2016) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441 · Cited by 1,656 · see citing works
Streams, Substructures, and the Early History of the Milky Way
Helmi, A. (2020) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021917 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
The shape of the Galactic halo with<i>Gaia</i>DR2 RR Lyrae. Anatomy of an ancient major merger
Iorio, G., & Belokurov, V. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2806 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“G A ] 1 5 O ct (Benson et al. 2004; Zolotov et al. 2009; McCarthy et al. 2012; Tissera et al. 2013; Cooper et al. 2015).”
Fernández-Alvar, E., Carigi, L., Schuster, W. J., Hayes, C. R., Ávila-Vergara, N., Majewski, S. R., Allende Prieto, C., Beers, T. C., Sánchez, S. F., Zamora, O., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9ced · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Tissera, P. B., Scannapieco, C., Beers, T. C., & Carollo, D.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- University of Potsdam (DE)
- Kitt Peak National Observatory (US)
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-05-17
- Volume
- 432
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3391-3400
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2059976011
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 8.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0822648, 0216783)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- stellar haloes, Milky Way-like galaxies, Aquarius Project, binding energy, alpha-element abundances, abundance gradients, halo kinematics, satellite galaxy accretion, chemical enrichment, Milky Way, M31
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review