Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The halo mass function through the cosmic ages

Open access
Watson, William A., Iliev, Ilian T., D’Aloisio, Anson, Knebe, Alexander, Shapiro, Paul R., Yepes, Gustavo·2013·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate how the dark matter halo mass function evolves with redshift, based on a suite of very large (with Np = 30723-60003 particles) cosmological N-body simulations. Our halo catalogue data span a redshift range of z = 0–30, allowing us to probe the mass function from the Dark Ages to the present. We utilize both the friends-of-friends (FOF) and spherical overdensity (SO) halo-finding methods to directly compare the mass function derived using these commonly used halo definitions. The mass function from SO haloes exhibits a clear evolution with redshift, especially during the recent era of dark energy dominance (z < 1). We provide a redshift-parametrized fit for the SO mass function valid for the entire redshift range to within ∼20 per cent as well as a scheme to calculate the mass function for haloes with arbitrary overdensities. The FOF mass function displays a weaker evolution with redshift. We provide a ‘universal’ fit for the FOF mass function, fitted to data across the entire redshift range simultaneously, and observe redshift evolution in our data versus this fit. The relative evolution of the mass functions derived via the two methods is compared. For an SO halo defined via an overdensity of 178 versus the background matter density and an FOF halo defined via a linking length of 0.2 times the mean interparticle separation we find that the mass functions most closely match at z = 0. The disparity at z = 0 between the FOF and SO mass functions resides in their high-mass tails where the collapsed fraction of mass in SO haloes is ∼80 per cent of that in FOF haloes. This difference grows with redshift so that, by z > 20, the SO algorithm finds a ∼50–80 per cent lower collapsed fraction in high-mass haloes than the FOF algorithm.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stt791

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Watson, W. A., Iliev, I. T., D’Aloisio, A., Knebe, A., Shapiro, P. R., & Yepes, G.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2013-06-04
Volume
433
Issue
2
Pages
1230-1245
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W1986299038
Cited by
287
References
4
FWCI
13.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The halo mass function through the cosmic ages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stt791
The paper
Watson, W. A., Iliev, I. T., D’Aloisio, A., Knebe, A., Shapiro, P. R., & Yepes, G. (2013). The halo mass function through the cosmic ages. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt791

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.