The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feedback-regulated star formation in molecular clouds and galactic discs
Open accessAbstract
We present a two-zone theory for feedback-regulated star formation in galactic discs, consistently connecting the galaxy-averaged star formation law with star formation proceeding in giant molecular clouds (GMCs). Our focus is on galaxies with gas surface density Σg ≳ 100 M⊙ pc−2, where the interstellar medium (ISM) can be assumed to be fully molecular. This regime includes most star formation in the Universe and our basic framework can be extended to other galaxies. In our theory, the galactic disc consists of Toomre-mass GMCs embedded in a volume-filling ISM. Radiation pressure on dust disperses GMCs and most supernovae explode in the volume-filling medium. A galaxy-averaged star formation law is derived by balancing the momentum input from supernova feedback with the vertical gravitational weight of the disc gas. This star formation law is in good agreement with observations for a CO conversion factor depending continuously on Σg. We argue that the galaxy-averaged star formation efficiency per free-fall time, |$\epsilon _{\rm ff}^{\rm gal}$|, is only a weak function of the efficiency with which GMCs convert their gas into stars, |$\epsilon _{\rm int}^{\rm GMC}$|. This is possible because the rate limiting step for star formation is the rate at which GMCs form: for large efficiency of star formation in GMCs, the Toomre Q parameter obtains a value slightly above unity so that the GMC formation rate is consistent with the galaxy-averaged star formation law. We contrast our results with other theories of turbulence-regulated star formation and discuss predictions of our model. Using a compilation of data from the literature, we show that the galaxy-averaged star formation efficiency per free-fall time is non-universal and increases with increasing gas fraction, as predicted by our model. We also predict that the fraction of the disc gas mass in bound GMCs decreases for increasing values of the GMC star formation efficiency. This is qualitatively consistent with the smooth molecular gas distribution inferred in local ultraluminous infrared galaxies and the small mass fraction in giant clumps in high-redshift galaxies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Starburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126
On the Gravitational Stability of a Disk of Stars
Toomre, A. (1964) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/147861 · Cited by 3,349 · cited 1×
“(5) There is strong observational evidence that star-forming discs self-regulate to sustain a Toomre (1964) parameter Q = κcT πGΣg = 2σcT πGΣgr ∼ 1, (6) where κ ≡ √ 4Ω2 + dΩ2/d ln r = 2σ/r is the epicyclic frequency (e.g., Quirk 1972; Kennicutt 1989; Martin & Kennicutt 2001).”
BackgroundStar Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902 · cited 1×
“In contrast, the volume-filling factor of molecular clouds in the inner Galaxy is ∼ 0.005 (RomanDuval et al. 2010; Kennicutt & Evans 2012) and is much lower in the rest of the Milky Way.”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Physical Models of Galaxy Formation in a Cosmological Framework
Somerville, R. S., & Davé, R. (2015) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951 · Cited by 1,442
Dusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift
Casey, C. M., Narayanan, D., & Cooray, A. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.009 · Cited by 800
The cosmic baryon cycle and galaxy mass assembly in the FIRE simulations
Anglés-Alcázar, D., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Kereš, D., Hopkins, P. F., Quataert, E., & Murray, N. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1517 · Cited by 422
Self-citationRECONCILING THE STELLAR AND NEBULAR SPECTRA OF HIGH-REDSHIFT GALAXIES*
Steidel, C. C., Strom, A. L., Pettini, M., Rudie, G. C., Reddy, N. A., & Trainor, R. F. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/159 · Cited by 414
Krumholz, M. R. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.001 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Quataert, E., & Hopkins, P. F.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-06-12
- Volume
- 433
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1970-1990
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1983134497
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feedback-regulated star formation in molecular clouds and galactic discs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stt866
- The paper
- Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Quataert, E., & Hopkins, P. F. (2013). Feedback-regulated star formation in molecular clouds and galactic discs. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt866
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.