Cited by 251Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Colours and luminosities of z = 0.1 galaxies in the eagle simulation

Open access

Abstract

We calculate the colours and luminosities of redshift z = 0.1 galaxies from the EAGLE simulation suite using the GALAXEV population synthesis models. We take into account obscuration by dust in birth clouds and diffuse ISM using a two-component screen model, following the prescription of Charlot and Fall. We compare models in which the dust optical depth is constant to models where it depends on gas metallicity, gas fraction and orientation. The colours of EAGLE galaxies for the more sophisticated models are in broad agreement with those of observed galaxies. In particular, EAGLE produces a red sequence of passive galaxies and a blue cloud of star forming galaxies, with approximately the correct fraction of galaxies in each population and with g-r colours within 0.1 magnitudes of those observed. Luminosity functions from UV to NIR wavelengths differ from observations at a level comparable to systematic shifts resulting from a choice between Petrosian and Kron photometric apertures. Despite the generally good agreement there are clear discrepancies with observations. The blue cloud of EAGLE galaxies extends to somewhat higher luminosities than in the data, consistent with the modest underestimate of the passive fraction in massive EAGLE galaxies. There is also a moderate excess of bright blue galaxies compared to observations. The overall level of agreement with the observed colour distribution suggests that EAGLE galaxies at z = 0.1 have ages, metallicities and levels of obscuration that are comparable to those of observed galaxies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stv1461

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 114 references

2 of the 114 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Baldry, 2010, MNRAS, 404, 86
  2. Bressan, 1993, A&AS, 100, 647
  3. Hill, 2011, MNRAS, 412, 765
  4. Inoue A. K. 2012. preprint (arXiv:1202.2932). · arXiv
  5. Loveday J. 1998. preprint (arXiv:astro-ph/9805255). · arXiv
  6. Rahmati A. Schaye J. Bower R. G. Crain R. A. Furlong M. Schaller M. Theuns T. 2015. preprint (arXiv:1503.05553). · arXiv
  7. Rosas-Guevara Y. M. . 2013. preprint (arXiv:1312.0598). · arXiv
  8. Rosdahl J. Schaye J. Teyssier R. Agertz O. MNRAS 2015;451:4553.
  9. Sawala T. . 2014. preprint (arXiv:1406.6362). · arXiv
  10. Tully, 1977, A&A, 54, 661

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–250 of 250

Metadata

Authors
Trayford, J. W., Theuns, T., Bower, R. G., Schaye, J., Furlong, M., Schaller, M., Frenk, C. S., Crain, R. A., Vecchia, C. D., & McCarthy, I. G.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
  • Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
Corresponding author
Trayford, James W.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2015-07-29
Volume
452
Issue
3
Pages
2879-2896
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W1735913374
Cited by
251
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 7
FWCI
17.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Durham University (ST/K00042X/1, ST/K003267/1, ST/H008519/1)
  • Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (AP P7/08 CHARM)
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/I00162X/1, ST/H008519, ST/I004459/2, ST/K00042X/1, ST/M007006/1, ST/L00075X/1, ST/L00061X/1, ST/F001166/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/K003267/1, ST/I004459/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
galaxy color, galaxy luminosity function, EAGLE simulation, dust attenuation, red sequence, blue cloud, quiescent galaxies, star-forming galaxies, intermediate-redshift galaxies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review