CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,745Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z=0.15

Open access
Ross, Ashley J., Samushia, Lado, Howlett, Cullan, Percival, Will J., Burden, Angela, Manera, Marc·2015·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
DOI 10.1093/mnras/stv154
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We create a sample of spectroscopically identified galaxies with z < 0.2 from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 7 (DR7), covering 6813 deg2. Galaxies are chosen to sample the highest mass haloes, with an effective bias of 1.5, allowing us to construct 1000 mock galaxy catalogues (described in Paper II), which we use to estimate statistical errors and test our methods. We use an estimate of the gravitational potential to ‘reconstruct’ the linear density fluctuations, enhancing the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) signal in the measured correlation function and power spectrum. Fitting to these measurements, we determine DV(zeff = 0.15) = (664 ± 25)(rd/rd, fid) Mpc; this is a better than 4 per cent distance measurement. This ‘fills the gap’ in BAO distance ladder between previously measured local and higher redshift measurements, and affords significant improvement in constraining the properties of dark energy. Combining our measurement with other BAO measurements from Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey and 6-degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey galaxy samples provides a 15 per cent improvement in the determination of the equation of state of dark energy and the value of the Hubble parameter at z = 0 (H0). Our measurement is fully consistent with the Planck results and the Λ cold dark matter concordance cosmology, but increases the tension between Planck+BAO H0 determinations and direct H0 measurements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stv154

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 76 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Howlett, 2014, MNRAS

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 1,005

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ross, A. J., Samushia, L., Howlett, C., Percival, W. J., Burden, A., & Manera, M.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Ilia State University (GE)
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Ross, Ashley J.
ORCID
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2015-03-19
Volume
449
Issue
1
Pages
835-847
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
DOI
10.1093/mnras/stv154
OpenAlex
W2170967203
Cited by
1,745
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 152 · 2024: 209 · 2023: 179 · 2022: 185 · 2021: 195 · 2020: 206 · 2019: 172 · 2018: 144 · 2017: 117 · 2016: 94 · 2015: 30
FWCI
73.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Princeton University
  • University of Chicago
  • University of Washington
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University of Portsmouth
  • New Mexico State University
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik
  • South East Physics Network
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/J500665/1, ST/K0090X/1, ST/K502248/1, ST/K00090X/1)
  • U.S. Naval Observatory
  • Fermilab
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic distance scale, dark energy equation of state, Hubble parameter, galaxy clustering, mock galaxy catalogues, Hubble tension, cosmological constraints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review