Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SZ effects in the Magneticum Pathfinder simulation: comparison with the Planck, SPT, and ACT results

Open access
Dolag, K., Komatsu, E., Sunyaev, R.·2016·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We calculate the one-point probability density distribution functions (PDF) and the power spectra of the thermal and kinetic Sunyaev–Zeldovich (tSZ and kSZ) effects and the mean Compton Y parameter using the Magneticum Pathfinder simulations, state-of-the-art cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of a large cosmological volume of (896 Mpc h−1)3. These simulations follow in detail the thermal and chemical evolution of the intracluster medium as well as the evolution of supermassive black holes and their associated feedback processes. We construct full-sky maps of tSZ and kSZ from the light-cones out to z = 0.17, and one realization of 8|$_{.}^{\circ}$|8 × 8|$_{.}^{\circ}$|8 deep light-cone out to z = 5.2. The local universe at z < 0.027 is simulated by a constrained realization. The tail of the one-point PDF of tSZ from the deep light-cone follows a power-law shape with an index of −3.2. Once convolved with the effective beam of Planck, it agrees with the PDF measured by Planck. The predicted tSZ power spectrum agrees with that of the Planck data at all multipoles up to l ≈ 1000, once the calculations are scaled to the Planck 2015 cosmological parameters with Ωm = 0.308 and σ8 = 0.8149. Consistent with the results in the literature, however, we continue to find the tSZ power spectrum at l = 3000 that is significantly larger than that estimated from the high-resolution ground-based data. The simulation predicts the mean fluctuating Compton Y value of |$\bar{Y}=1.18\times 10^{-6}$| for Ωm = 0.272 and σ8 = 0.809. Nearly half (≈5 × 10−7) of the signal comes from haloes below a virial mass of 1013 M⊙ h−1. Scaling this to the Planck 2015 parameters, we find |$\bar{Y}=1.57\times {}10^{-6}$|⁠.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stw2035

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Dolag, K., Komatsu, E., & Sunyaev, R.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2016-08-16
Volume
463
Issue
2
Pages
1797-1811
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2177551589
Cited by
210
References
6
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SZ effects in the Magneticum Pathfinder simulation: comparison with the Planck, SPT, and ACT results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stw2035
The paper
Dolag, K., Komatsu, E., & Sunyaev, R. (2016). SZ effects in the Magneticum Pathfinder simulation: comparison with the Planck, SPT, and ACT results. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2035

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.