Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Black holes on FIRE: stellar feedback limits early feeding of galactic nuclei

Open access
Anglés-Alcázar, Daniel, Faucher-Giguère, Claude-André, Quataert, Eliot, Hopkins, Philip F., Feldmann, Robert, Torrey, Paul, Wetzel, Andrew, Kereš, Dušan·2017·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters

Abstract

We introduce massive black holes (BHs) in the Feedback In Realistic Environments (FIRE) project and perform high-resolution cosmological hydrodynamic simulations of quasar-mass haloes [Mhalo(z = 2) ≈ 1012.5 M⊙] down to z = 1. These simulations model stellar feedback by supernovae, stellar winds and radiation, and BH growth using a gravitational torque-based prescription tied to the resolved properties of galactic nuclei. We do not include BH feedback. We show that early BH growth occurs through short (≲1 Myr) accretion episodes that can reach or even exceed the Eddington rate. In this regime, BH growth is limited by bursty stellar feedback continuously evacuating gas from galactic nuclei, and BHs remain undermassive in low-mass galaxies relative to the local MBH–Mbulgerelation. BH growth is more efficient at later times, when the nuclear stellar potential retains a significant gas reservoir, star formation becomes less bursty and galaxies settle into a more ordered state. BHs rapidly converge on to the observed scaling relations when the host reaches Mbulge ∼ 1010 M⊙. We show that resolving the effects of stellar feedback on the gas supply in the inner ∼100 pc of galaxies is necessary to accurately capture the growth of central BHs. Our simulations imply that bursty stellar feedback has important implications for BH–galaxy relations, AGN demographics and time variability, the formation of early quasars and massive BH mergers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnrasl/slx161

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Anglés-Alcázar, D., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Quataert, E., Hopkins, P. F., Feldmann, R., Torrey, P., Wetzel, A., & Kereš, D.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters
Published
2017-10-05
Volume
472
Issue
1
Pages
L109-L114
ISSN
  • 1745-3925 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-3933
OpenAlex
W2735520393
Cited by
264
References
72
FWCI
12.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Black holes on FIRE: stellar feedback limits early feeding of galactic nuclei. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnrasl/slx161
The paper
Anglés-Alcázar, D., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Quataert, E., Hopkins, P. F., Feldmann, R., Torrey, P., Wetzel, A., & Kereš, D. (2017). Black holes on FIRE: stellar feedback limits early feeding of galactic nuclei. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slx161

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.