The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Empirical Codon Model for Protein Sequence Evolution
Open accessAbstract
In the past, 2 kinds of Markov models have been considered to describe protein sequence evolution. Codon-level models have been mechanistic with a small number of parameters designed to take into account features, such as transition-transversion bias, codon frequency bias, and synonymous-nonsynonymous amino acid substitution bias. Amino acid models have been empirical, attempting to summarize the replacement patterns observed in large quantities of data and not explicitly considering the distinct factors that shape protein evolution. We have estimated the first empirical codon model (ECM). Previous codon models assume that protein evolution proceeds only by successive single nucleotide substitutions, but our results indicate that model accuracy is significantly improved by incorporating instantaneous doublet and triplet changes. We also find that the affiliations between codons, the amino acid each encodes and the physicochemical properties of the amino acids are main factors driving the process of codon evolution. Neither multiple nucleotide changes nor the strong influence of the genetic code nor amino acids' physicochemical properties form a part of standard mechanistic models and their views of how codon evolution proceeds. We have implemented the ECM for likelihood-based phylogenetic analysis, and an assessment of its ability to describe protein evolution shows that it consistently outperforms comparable mechanistic codon models. We point out the biological interpretation of our ECM and possible consequences for studies of selection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
The International HapMap Project
†The International HapMap Consortium, Genotyping centres: Baylor College of Medicine and ParAllele BioScience, Gibbs, R. A., Belmont, J. W., Hardenbol, P., Willis, T. D., Yu, F., Chinese HapMap Consortium, Yang, H., Ch'ang, L.-Y., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02168 · Cited by 6,057
Yang, Z. (1994) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00160154 · Cited by 2,960
Whelan, S., & Goldman, N. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003851 · Cited by 2,849
Self-citationA codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences.
(1994) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040153 · Cited by 1,960
Self-citationYang, Z., & Nielsen, R. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004148 · Cited by 1,374
Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution
Yang, Z. (1994) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00178256 · Cited by 1,076
(1994) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040152 · Cited by 920
Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution
Goldman, N. (1993) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00166252 · Cited by 736 · cited 2×
“The LRT offers a very powerful way of comparing models (Silvey 1970), widely used in phylogenetics (Goldman 1993; Felsenstein 2004).”
BackgroundMethodAssessing the Impact of Secondary Structure and Solvent Accessibility on Protein Evolution
Goldman, N., Thorne, J. L., & Jones, D. T. (1998) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/149.1.445 · Cited by 281
Self-citation
Cited by
An Improved General Amino Acid Replacement Matrix
Le, S. Q., & Gascuel, O. (2008) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msn067 · Cited by 3,127
Extensive and coordinated transcription of noncoding RNAs within cell-cycle promoters
Hung, T., Wang, Y., Lin, M. F., Koegel, A. K., Kotake, Y., Grant, G. D., Horlings, H. M., Shah, N., Umbricht, C., Wang, P., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.848 · Cited by 1,163
PhyloCSF: a comparative genomics method to distinguish protein-coding and non-coding regions
Lin, M., Jungreis, I., & Kellis, M. (2010) · Nature Precedings · doi:10.1038/npre.2010.4784.1 · Cited by 1,016
Gene-Wide Identification of Episodic Selection
Murrell, B., Weaver, S., Smith, M. D., Wertheim, J. O., Murrell, S., Aylward, A., Eren, K., Pollner, T., Martin, D. P., Smith, D. M., et al. (2015) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msv035 · Cited by 656
INDELible: A Flexible Simulator of Biological Sequence Evolution
Fletcher, W., & Yang, Z. (2009) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp098 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Kosiol, C., Holmes, I., & Goldman, N.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-03-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1464-1479
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2126371317
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Empirical Codon Model for Protein Sequence Evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molbev/msm064
- The paper
- Kosiol, C., Holmes, I., & Goldman, N. (2007). An Empirical Codon Model for Protein Sequence Evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.