Cited by 206Reproductive System and PregnancyPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesCell death mechanisms and regulation

Trophoblasts express Fas ligand: a proposed mechanism for immune privilege in placenta and maternal invasion

Uckan, D·1997·Molecular Human Reproduction

Abstract

Cross-linking of Fas (CD95, APO-1) and Fas ligand (FasL; CD95L) induces apoptosis of Fas-bearing cells. Recent evidence suggests that FasL. expression plays an important role in maintenance of immune privilege in murine testis and eye and in tumour escape from immune rejection in colon cancer, melanoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Bcl-2 is a membrane protein that suppresses apoptosis in response to a variety of stimuli. In this paper we describe abundant expression of FasL protein and mRNA transcripts within the immune privileged environment of the placenta by immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription in-situ polymerase chain reaction methods. The syncytiotrophoblast layer, the main site of feto-maternal interface, and extravillous trophoblasts, demonstrated consistent immunoreactivity for FasL in term placentae. Co-occurrence of Fas and Bcl-2 were detected with a similar pattern of distribution with FasL. The TUNEL method revealed evidence of apoptosis in the placental tissues. We speculate that abundant presence of FasL in the trophoblast contributes to immune privilege in this unique environment, perhaps by fostering apoptosis of activated Fas-expressing lymphocytes of maternal origin. An apoptotic process mediated by FasL may also play a role in placental invasion during implantation and underscores similarities between the trophoblast and neoplastic cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molehr/3.8.655

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uckan, D.
Venue
Molecular Human Reproduction
Published
1997-08-01
Volume
3
Issue
8
Pages
655-662
ISSN
  • 1360-9947 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2407
OpenAlex
W2104330540
Cited by
206
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • McMaster University
  • U.S. Public Health Service (05628-13)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
Keywords
Fas ligand, trophoblast, immune privilege, placenta, syncytiotrophoblast, extravillous trophoblast, Bcl-2, apoptosis, maternal-fetal interface, maternal-fetal immune tolerance, implantation, tumor immune evasion
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Membrane Glycoproteins, Placenta, Pregnancy, RNA, Messenger, Transcription, Genetic, Trophoblasts, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Apoptosis, fas Receptor, Fas Ligand Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review