Cited by 25Genetic diversity and population structureMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchCoral and Marine Ecosystems Studies

Restricted gene flow among western Indian Ocean populations of the mangrove whelk Terebralia palustris (Linnaeus, 1767) (Caenogastropoda: Potamididae)

Open access
Ratsimbazafy, Hajaniaina Andrianavalonarivo, Kochzius, Marc·2018·Journal of Molluscan Studies

Abstract

To investigate gene-flow patterns in the western Indian Ocean (WIO), tissue samples of Terebralia palustris were collected along the coasts of East Africa and Madagascar. A fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was sequenced in 308 individuals from 18 sites. Based on a COI fragment of 624 base pairs, 43 haplotypes were identified. The two most abundant haplotypes were shared among all sample sites, but 20.9% of the haplotypes were restricted to the sites in southern Mozambique. Population expansion was found and confirmed by moderate haplotype diversity, low nucleotide diversity and the analysis of demographic history. Analysis of molecular variances (AMOVA) revealed significant genetic differentiation among populations (φst = 0.10, P ≤ 0.001). Pairwise φst and a hierarchical AMOVA (φct = 0.04, P = 0.01) suggest significant genetic differentiation among five regions: (1) northern Kenya, (2) Kenya, Tanzania and western Madagascar, (3) northeastern Madagascar, (4) southern Madagascar and (5) southern Mozambique. Since the analysis of isolation by distance did not show a significant correlation between geographic distance and genetic differentiation, even though the maximum distance between sites is about 3,050 km (Z = 7,513.89, r = 0.12, P = 0.08), the complex oceanography in the WIO could be the main factor that restricts gene flow.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mollus/eyy001

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. BARNES, D., CORRIE, A., WHITTINGTON, M., CARVALHO, M. & GELL, F. 1998. Coastal shellfish resource use in the Quirimba Archipelago, Mozambique. Journal of Shellfish Research, 17: 51-58.
  2. BOSIRE, J., LANG'AT, J., KIRUI, B., KAIRO, J., MUGI, L. & HAMZA, A. 2016b. Mangrove of Kenya. In: Mangroves of the Western Indian Ocean: status and management (J. Bosire, M. Mangora, S. Bandeira, A. Rajkaran, R. Ratsimbazafy, C. Appadoo & J. Kairo, eds), pp. 15-30.
  3. MACAMO, C., BANDEIRA, S., MUANDO, S., ABREU, D. & MABILANA, H. 2016. Mangroves of Mozambique. In: Mangroves of the Western Indian Ocean: status and management (J. Bosire, M. Mangora, S. Bandeira, A. Rajkaran, R. Ratsimbazafy, C. Appadoo & J. Kairo, eds), pp. 51-73. WIOMSA, Zanzibar.
  4. MANGORA, M., LUGENDO, B., SHALLI, M. & SAMESI, S. 2016. Mangrove of Tanzania. In: Mangroves of the Western Indian Ocean: status and man- agement (J. Bosire, M. Mangora, S. Bandeira, A. Rajkaran, R. Ratsimbazafy, C. Appadoo & J. Kairo, eds), pp. 33-49. WIOMSA, Zanzibar.
  5. RATSIMBAZAFY, R., RANDRIAMANANTENA, D., RAKOTONDRAZAFY, J., RAKOTOMALALA, H., RAMAHERY, V., ROGER, E., RAZAKANIRINA, H., RABARISON, H., LAVITRA, T., MAHAFINA, J., RAVAOARINOROTSIHOARANA, L., CRIPPS, G., ENGLAND, K., CARRO, A., JONES, T., GLASS, L., TAYLOR, B. & DANHAIVE, L. 2016. Mangroves of Madagascar. In: Mangroves of the Western Indian Ocean: status and management (J. Bosire, M. Mangora, S. Bandeira, A. Rajkaran, R. Ratsimbazafy, C. Appadoo & J. Kairo, eds), pp. 95-112.
  6. SCHELTEMA, R. & WILLIAMS, I. 1983. Long-distance dispersal of planktonic larvae and the biogeography and evolution of some Polynesian and western Pacific molluscs. Bulletin of Marine Science, 33: 545-565.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ratsimbazafy, H. A., & Kochzius, M.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Corresponding author
Ratsimbazafy, Hajaniaina Andrianavalonarivo
Venue
Journal of Molluscan Studies
Published
2018-02-08
Volume
84
Issue
2
Pages
163-169
ISSN
  • 0260-1230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3766
OpenAlex
W2789705455
Cited by
25
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Molluscan Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Flanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Keywords
Terebralia palustris, gene flow, population structure, mitochondrial COI haplotypes, genetic differentiation, population growth, isolation by distance, oceanographic barriers, Western Indian Ocean, Madagascar, East Africa, Mozambique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review