Population genetics of the brooding coral Seriatopora hystrix reveals patterns of strong genetic differentiation in the Western Indian Ocean
Open accessAbstract
Coral reefs provide essential goods and services but are degrading at an alarming rate due to local and global anthropogenic stressors. The main limitation that prevents the implementation of adequate conservation measures is that connectivity and genetic structure of populations are poorly known. Here, the genetic diversity and connectivity of the brooding scleractinian coral Seriatopora hystrix were assessed at two scales by genotyping ten microsatellite markers for 356 individual colonies. S. hystrix showed high differentiation, both at large scale between the Red Sea and the Western Indian Ocean (WIO), and at smaller scale along the coast of East Africa. As such high levels of differentiation might indicate the presence of more than one species, a haploweb analysis was conducted with the nuclear marker ITS2, confirming that the Red Sea populations are genetically distinct from the WIO ones. Based on microsatellite analyses three groups could be distinguished within the WIO: (1) northern Madagascar, (2) south-west Madagascar together with one site in northern Mozambique (Nacala) and (3) all other sites in northern Mozambique, Tanzania and Kenya. These patterns of restricted connectivity could be explained by the short pelagic larval duration of S. hystrix, and/or by oceanographic factors, such as eddies in the Mozambique Channel (causing larval retention in northern Madagascar but facilitating dispersal from northern Mozambique towards south-west Madagascar). This study provides an additional line of evidence supporting the conservation priority status of the Northern Mozambique Channel and should inform coral reef management decisions in the region.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study used ten microsatellites and nuclear ITS2 to assess genetic diversity and connectivity in the brooding coral *Seriatopora hystrix* across the Red Sea and Western Indian Ocean. It found strong differentiation at both large and regional scales, with Red Sea samples distinct from the WIO and three genetic groups within the WIO.
Key findings
- Red Sea sites were strongly differentiated from all WIO sites, with pairwise \(F_{ST}\) values of 0.377–0.614 for Ras Masturah and 0.391–0.589 for Shi’b Al Bayda; 94% of pairwise population comparisons were significant.
- Within the WIO, analyses distinguished three groups: northern Madagascar, south-west Madagascar together with Nacala in northern Mozambique, and the remaining sites in northern Mozambique, Tanzania and Kenya. STRUCTURE supported \(K=5\) clusters overall, while DAPC identified six clusters.
- ITS2 haploweb analysis separated Red Sea and WIO samples into two fields for recombination, suggesting a possible species boundary between them.
- Genetic diversity ranged from allelic richness 1.5–2.4, observed heterozygosity 0.166–0.367 and unbiased expected heterozygosity 0.198–0.409; NMC sites had higher allelic richness than EAC sites (2.0 vs 1.7, \(P<0.05\)), and Nacala had the most private alleles (7). No recent bottleneck was detected.
Methods
- A total of 356 *S. hystrix* colonies were sampled from two Red Sea locations in Saudi Arabia and 12 WIO locations in Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique and Madagascar; colonies were collected at least 2 m apart to reduce clone sampling.
- Samples were genotyped at ten microsatellite loci, and ITS2 was sequenced for 77 of 85 selected samples, yielding 124 sequences and 24 haplotypes of 566–572 bp.
- Population structure was assessed with pairwise \(F_{ST}\), \(D_{EST}\), Mantel tests, STRUCTURE, DAPC and haploweb analysis; diversity metrics included allelic richness, heterozygosity, private alleles, Hardy–Weinberg tests and bottleneck tests.
Limitations
- The paper states that the Red Sea–WIO species boundary is preliminary because no intermediate reefs were sampled, only ITS2 was used, and paralogs could not be ruled out; verification with morphology and multilocus approaches such as RADseq or ultraconserved elements is needed.
- The paper notes that no *S. hystrix* colonies were found south of Nacala despite predicted occurrence, so further sampling is required before conclusions about substructure along the full Mozambique coast.
- The paper states that only two SMC sites were analysed, so their allelic-richness results were not discussed; it also cautions that small sample sizes may have reduced statistical power and caused false negatives in bottleneck tests and some non-significant pairwise comparisons. Evident from the text: two loci had suspected null alleles at single sites, one locus was missing at Ramena, and haplowebs are single-locus methods that can be affected by selection, introgression or shared ancestral variation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 60 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
An ITS2 haploweb analysis confirms that Red Sea populations of S. hystrix are genetically distinct from Western Indian Ocean populations.
“a haploweb analysis was conducted with the nuclear marker ITS2, confirming that the Red Sea populations are genetically distinct from the WIO ones.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Seriatopora hystrix shows strong genetic differentiation along the East African coast at a smaller spatial scale.
“S. hystrix showed high differentiation, both at large scale between the Red Sea and the Western Indian Ocean (WIO), and at smaller scale along the coast of East Africa.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Seven identical multilocus genotypes were found at Toliara.
“Additionally, seven identical multilocus genotypes were found in sample site Toliara.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Seriatopora hystrix shows strong genetic differentiation between the Red Sea and the Western Indian Ocean.
“S. hystrix showed high differentiation, both at large scale between the Red Sea and the Western Indian Ocean (WIO), and at smaller scale along the coast of East Africa.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Bayesian clustering in STRUCTURE showed an optimum ΔK for K = 5, the most likely number of genetic clusters for all sample sites.
“The Bayesian clustering implemented in STRUC-TURE showed both a plateau for the log probability and an optimum ΔK for K = 5, the most likely number of genetic clusters for all sample sites (Appendix S8 and Fig. 1a, b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Microsatellite analyses distinguish three groups within the Western Indian Ocean: northern Madagascar; south-west Madagascar together with Nacala in northern Mozambique; and all other sites in northern Mozambique, Tanzania and Kenya.
“Based on microsatellite analyses three groups could be distinguished within the WIO: (1) northern Madagascar, (2) south-west Madagascar together with one site in northern Mozambique (Nacala) and (3) all other sites in northern Mozambique, Tanzania and Kenya.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The DAPC clusters were divided into four groups: Saudi Arabia; Kenya, Tanzania and some northern Mozambique individuals; northern Mozambique and south-west Madagascar; and northern Madagascar.
“These clusters could be divided into four groups: (1) Cluster I in Saudi Arabia (Ras Masturah, Shi'b Al Bayda); (2) Clusters II and III in Kenya, Tanzania and some individuals from northern Mozambique (Kisite, Misali, Zanzibar, Mafia, Mikindani, Vamizi, Pemba); transitioning to group (3) formed by Cluster IV and Cluster V in northern Mozambique and south-west Madagascar (Vamizi, Pemba, Nacala, Sal”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A Mantel test showed a significant correlation between population differentiation and geographical distance for all Western Indian Ocean sites.
“The Mantel test showed a significant correlation between population differentiation and geographical distance for all sites in the WIO (R 2 = 0.32, P = 0.02; Appendix S6)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within the Western Indian Ocean, allelic richness was significantly higher in the Northern Mozambique Channel than in the East African Coast, with values of 2.0 and 1.7, respectively.
“The one-sided comparisons of A r within the WIO showed significantly higher A r when comparing sites within the EAC and NMC, with A r = 1.7 and A r = 2.0, respectively (EAC < NMC, P < 0.05)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Analyses of distance intervals found significant values only for distances beyond 738 km.
“However, analyses of distance intervals showed that significant values were only found for distances beyond 738 km (loci Sh3-004, Sh4-001, Sh-009 and Sh4.28; Appendix S7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A Mantel test showed a significant correlation between population differentiation and geographical distance for sites in Kenya, Tanzania and northern Mozambique.
“as well as for sample sites from the region comprising Kenya, Tanzania and northern Mozambique (R 2 = 0.40, P = 0.0001; Appendix S6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When the Northern Mozambique Channel was considered without Madagascar, it still had higher allelic richness than the East African Coast, with a value of 2.0.
“When considering the NMC without Madagascar, the NMC region still had a higher A r (A r = 2.0, EAC < NMC mainland, P < 0.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Testing two groups, Western Indian Ocean below 4000 km and Red Sea above 4000 km, revealed significant contributions of stepwise mutations for two loci, Sh3-004 and Sh4-001.
“Additional testing of two groups, WIO (<4000 km) and Red Sea (>4000 km), revealed significant (P < 0.05) contributions of stepwise mutations for two loci (Sh3-004 and Sh4-001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pairwise FST values showed significant differentiation in 94% of population comparisons.
“The sample sites were highly differentiated according to pairwise F ST values, with significant differentiation found in 94% of the pairwise population comparisons (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Nine pairs of identical multilocus genotypes were found within sample sites: one pair at Shi'b Al Bayda, two at Kisite, three at Zanzibar, two at Nosy Be, and one at Toliara.
“Within the sample sites, nine pairs of identical multilocus genotypes were found: one pair at the sample site Shi'b Al Bayda, two pairs at Kisite, three pairs at Zanzibar, two pairs at Nosy Be, and one pair at Toliara.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Grouping populations by Red Sea, Madagascar and other sample sites revealed 2, 12 and 18 private alleles, respectively.
“A separate analysis after grouping the populations from the Red Sea, Madagascar and of the other sample sites revealed 2, 12 and 18 private alleles, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of 356 sampled colonies, 341 had unique multilocus genotypes.
“Of the 356 sampled colonies, 341 were found to harbour unique multilocus genotypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Allelic richness was higher in the Southern Mozambique Channel, with a value of 2.3, than in the East African Coast and Northern Mozambique Channel.
“and higher A r in the SMC (A r = 2.3, SMC > EAC, P < 0.05; SMC > NMC, P < 0.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No S. hystrix colonies were found in Mozambique south of Nacala, despite sampling at Vilanculos, Pembane, Tofo, Xai-Xai, Inhaca and Ponta do Ouro.
“It is important to note that in this study no S. hystrix colonies were found in Mozambique south of Nacala (for which the sampling campaign included Vilanculos, Pembane, Tofo, Xai-Xai, Inhaca and Ponta do Ouro).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The highest genetic differentiation was between the Red Sea sites Ras Masturah and Shi'b Al Bayda and all other sites.
“The highest genetic differentiation was found for the Red Sea sites Ras Masturah (0.377-0.614) and Shi'b Al Bayda (0.391-0.589) versus all other sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Analyses performed without the Red Sea samples gave similar results and interpretation.
“all analyses described above were also performed without the sample sites in the Red Sea, which provided similar results and interpretation (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The different analyses of this study did not identify definite genetic breaks along the East African Coast.
“However, when comparing the results of our different analyses, no definite genetic breaks were found, similarly to what was previously reported for a coral with a mixed reproduction strategy Pocillopora damicornis in Kenya (Souter et al. 2009), for the broadcast spawner Platygyra daedalea in Kenya (Souter and Grahn 2008), as well as for the broadcast spawner Acropora tenuis in Kenya and Tanzania (”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within FFR I, four haplotypes were found in ten individuals from two Red Sea locations.
“Within FFR I, four haplotypes were found in ten individuals from two locations in the Red Sea.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Individual-based cluster analyses confirm a degree of connectivity between northern Mozambique at Nacala and south-west Madagascar at Salary and Toliara.
“The individual-based cluster analyses, in which individuals from northern Mozambique are clustered with individuals from the south of Madagascar, confirm a degree of connectivity between northern Mozambique (NMC: Nacala) and south-west Madagascar (SMC: Salary and Toliara).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ITS2 analyses ruled out the occurrence of cryptic species in northern Madagascar, at Nosy Be and Ramena.
“While the ITS2 analyses ruled out the occurrence of cryptic species in northern Madagascar (Nosy Be and Ramena), a strong differentiation from all other sites in the WIO was detected using microsatellite markers, indicating a possible contemporary barrier for larval dispersal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
This study confirmed assumed connectivity within the East African Coast for S. hystrix.
“For instance, this study confirmed assumed connectivity within the EAC for S. hystrix.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
S. hystrix has a widespread Indo-Pacific distribution, including the Red Sea, Madagascar, Kenya, Tanzania and northern and southern Mozambique.
“S. hystrix (Pocilloporidae; Dana 1846) is an ideal species for such study as it has a widespread distribution in the Indo-Pacific, occurring, e.g., in the Red Sea, Madagascar, along the coast of East Africa in Kenya and Tanzania, as well as in the north and south of Mozambique (Veron 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Veron 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The strong microsatellite differentiation of northern Madagascar from all other Western Indian Ocean sites indicates a possible contemporary barrier to larval dispersal.
“a strong differentiation from all other sites in the WIO was detected using microsatellite markers, indicating a possible contemporary barrier for larval dispersal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Drifter experiments demonstrated potential connectivity between northern Mozambique and south-west Madagascar.
“Potential connectivity between northern Mozambique and south-west Madagascar was demonstrated in drifter experiments (Ramanantsoa et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ramanantsoa et al. 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The ITS2 haploweb result that Red Sea and Western Indian Ocean individuals belong to two distinct FFRs suggests they correspond to two different species under the criterion of mutual allelic exclusivity.
“In the ITS2 haploweb individuals from the Red Sea and WIO indeed belong to two distinct FFRs, suggesting that they correspond to two different species using the criterion of mutual allelic exclusivity (Flot et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Flot et al. 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Red Sea and Western Indian Ocean sample sites belong to two different marine provinces: the Red Sea/Gulf of Aden and the Western Indian Ocean.
“Sample sites in the Red Sea and the WIO belong to two different marine provinces (Spalding et al. 2007): the Red Sea/Gulf of Aden and the WIO.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Spalding et al. 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The lower differentiation in those corals may be due to life-history differences, including reproductive strategies with longer pelagic larval duration and greater connectivity among reefs.
“This could be explained by differences in life histories of these corals, such as reproductive strategies associated with longer PLD and subsequent increased connectivity among surrounding reefs (Crochelet et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Crochelet et al. 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Oceanographic conditions in the Northern Mozambique Channel, specifically cyclonic eddies generated and residing in front of the northwest coast of Madagascar, could play an important role in isolating these coral populations.
“Oceanographic conditions in the NMC could play an important role in isolating these coral populations, specifically the cyclonic eddies that are generated and reside in front of the northwest coast of Madagascar (Collins et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Collins et al. 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The presence of distinct FFRs suggests the occurrence of two different species.
“Because distinct FFRs suggest the occurrence of two different species, all analyses described above were also performed without the sample sites in the Red Sea, which provided similar results and interpretation (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The results are congruent with a larval dispersal model in which northern Mozambique and south-west Madagascar belong to two separate clusters with lower potential exchange of larvae.
“This is congruent with the results of a larvae dispersal model in the WIO by Crochelet et al. (2016), in which these sites were found to belong to two separate clusters with a lower potential exchange of larvae.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Crochelet et al. 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Northern sites may have been recolonised from unsampled source populations, such as reefs further north and deeper refugia or mesophotic reefs that can contribute larvae to shallower reefs.
“Subsequent recolonisation of northern sites may have come from various source populations not sampled in this study, such as reefs further north and deeper refugia or mesophotic reefs, which can potentially contribute larvae to shallower reefs (Prasetia et al. 2017;van Oppen et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
Successful exchange of coral larvae between northern Mozambique and south-west Madagascar is unlikely to be frequent, given the high differentiation found between them.
“However, successful exchange of coral larvae is unlikely to be frequent, considering the high differentiation found here between northern Mozambique and south-west Madagascar.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Larval dispersal between northern Mozambique and south-west Madagascar is likely influenced by anticyclonic eddies generated in the Comoros Basin that proceed southward into the Mozambique Channel.
“Larval dispersal is likely under influence of anticyclonic eddies, generated in the Comoros Basin, after which they proceed southward into the Mozambique Channel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Western Indian Ocean gradient may result from severe historic bleaching events that affected northern and southern sample sites differently.
“The aforementioned gradient may therefore be the result of severe historic bleaching events that have impacted the northern and southern sample sites differently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 17
- May combine two claims. 52
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataNo significant linkage disequilibrium was detected.
“No significant linkage disequilibrium was detected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFour sample sites, Misali, Vamizi, Pemba and Nosy Be, showed positive FIS values and significant departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, indicating heterozygote deficits.
“Four sample sites (Misali, Vamizi, Pemba and Nosy Be) showed positive F IS values and significant departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, indicating heterozygote deficits (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo loci, Sh3-009 and Sh4.28, were polymorphic at all sample sites, while the other loci were monomorphic at at least one site.
“Two loci (Sh3-009 and Sh4.28) were found to be polymorphic for all sample sites, whereas the other loci were monomorphic for at least one sample site (Appendix S5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo population showed evidence of a recent bottleneck, and all sample sites had a normal L-shaped distribution of allele frequencies.
“None of the populations showed evidence of a recent bottleneck and all sample sites showed normal L-shaped distribution of allele frequencies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDEST values were congruent with FST values, indicating that FST did not underestimate the level and pattern of differentiation.
“D EST was congruent with F ST values (Table 2), indicating that F ST did not underestimate the level and pattern of differentiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataThe ITS2 marker was successfully sequenced for 77 of 85 S. hystrix samples.
“The ITS2 marker was successfully sequenced for 77 out of 85 samples of S. hystrix.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPrivate alleles were more frequent in southern sites, with a maximum of seven at Nacala.
“Private alleles were found more frequently in the southern sites, with a maximum of seven in Nacala.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe ten microsatellite markers amplified for all 14 sample sites except locus Sh2-005 in Ramena.
“The ten microsatellite markers amplified for all 14 sample sites except for locus Sh2-005 in sample site Ramena.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningTwo pairwise comparisons were not significant: Ras Masturah versus Pemba and Ras Masturah versus Vamizi.
“Two comparisons were not significant, Ras Masturah versus Pemba and Ras Masturah versus Vamizi”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMicro-Checker found possible null alleles at Mikindani for locus Sh3-009 and at Vamizi for locus Sh2-005.
“Further analysis with Micro-Checker found that two sample sites, Mikindani (locus Sh3-009) and Vamizi (locus Sh2-005), possibly had null alleles (Appendix S4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe STRUCTURE patterns were confirmed by comparing different K values and by separate STRUCTURE analyses for the Western Indian Ocean and the African mainland.
“These patterns were confirmed comparing different K values (K = 1-14, Appendix S8) as well as with separate STRUCTURE analyses for the WIO and for the African mainland (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDAPC revealed six clusters of S. hystrix, corresponding to the five STRUCTURE clusters plus an additional cluster shared between northern Mozambique and south-west Madagascar.
“The DAPC revealed six clustes (Fig. 2, cluster I-VI) of S. hystrix, corresponding to the five clusters identified by STRUCTURE plus an additional cluster shared between northern Mozambique and south-west Madagascar.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the East African mainland, differentiation was lower in Kenya and northern Tanzania but higher in southern Tanzania and Mozambique, with Nacala highly differentiated from all other sites except adjacent reefs and south-west Madagascar sites.
“At the East African mainland, differentiation was lower in Kenya and northern Tanzania, but higher in southern Tanzania and in Mozambique, with Nacala showing high differentiation compared to all other sites, except to adjacent reefs (Pemba and Vamizi) and sites in south-west Madagascar (Salary and Toliara).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAllelic richness ranged from 1.5 to 2.4, observed heterozygosity from 0.166 to 0.367, and unbiased expected heterozygosity from 0.198 to 0.409.
“The allelic richness (A r ) ranged between 1.5 and 2.4, the observed heterozygosity (H O ) between 0.166 and 0.367 and the unbiased expected heterozygosity (uH E ) between 0.198 and 0.409 (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationProbability of identity values were low for all sites, except Zanzibar where PI was 0.014, and were adequate for population studies.
“PIs were low for all sites (PI < 0.01, except in Zanzibar PI = 0.014) and therefore adequate for population studies (Waits et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Waits et al. 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWithin the Western Indian Ocean, strong differentiation was observed between the East African mainland and Madagascar, especially for Nosy Be and Ramena versus all other sites, and for Salary and Toliara in south-west Madagascar.
“Within the WIO, a strong differentiation between the East African mainland and sites in Madagascar was observed, especially for Nosy Be (0.283-0.562) and Ramena (0.327-0.610) versus all other sites, as well as for Salary (0.097-0.369) and Toliara (0.097-0.428) in south-west Madagascar.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlong the East African Coast, coral reefs show substantial genetic subdivision, with high pairwise differentiation that is lower than among other Western Indian Ocean sites except Nacala.
“Substantial subdivision was also found amongst coral reefs along the EAC: pairwise differentiation was high, although lower than amongst other sites in the WIO (except Nacala, as discussed above).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenS. hystrix has limited dispersal capacity and high genetic differentiation both at a large scale between the Red Sea and the Western Indian Ocean (>6000 km) and at a smaller scale between sites along the coast of Tanzania and Kenya (Kisite and Misali; <65 km).
“In conclusion, the brooding stony coral S. hystrix shows a limited dispersal capacity and a high differentiation both at a large scale between the Red Sea and the WIO (>6000 km), and at smaller scale for sites along the coast of Tanzania and Kenya (Kisite and Misali; <65 km).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAllelic richness was significantly higher at Northern Mozambique Channel sites than at sites further north, both when including mainland and Madagascar sites and for mainland sites alone.
“Allelic richness was significantly higher at the sites in the NMC compared to sites further north, both when including mainland and Madagascar sites and for mainland sites alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBayesian analyses indicate a Western Indian Ocean gradient, with one cluster more dominant in the north (Kisite, Misali, Zanzibar) and one or two clusters more dominant in the south (Mafia, Mikindani, Vamizi, Pemba), although Mikindani resembles northern sites in the DAPC analysis.
“Based on the prevalence of clusters in the Bayesian analyses, there is an indication for a gradient in the WIO, with one cluster more dominant in the north (EAC: Kisite, Misali and Zanzibar) and one or two clusters more dominant in the south (NMC: Mafia, Mikindani, Vamizi and Pemba; Fig. 1a, b), although Mikindani shows more resemblance to the northern sites in the DAPC analysis (Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe haploweb analysis revealed two distinct fields for recombination: FFR I contained all Red Sea individuals and FFR II contained all Western Indian Ocean individuals.
“This analysis revealed two distinct FFRs: FFR I comprised all individuals collected in the Red Sea, whereas FFR II comprised all individuals collected in the WIO.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were 30 homozygous and 47 heterozygous individuals, yielding 124 sequences corresponding to 24 haplotypes of 566-572 bp.
“There were 30 homozygous individuals and 47 heterozygous individuals, hence a total of 124 sequences corresponding to 24 haplotypes 566-572 bp long (Fig. 1c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWithin FFR II, 20 haplotypes were found in 67 individuals from 12 Western Indian Ocean locations, with the most prevalent haplotype in 40 individuals from 11 locations.
“Within FFR II, 20 haplotypes were found in 67 individuals from 12 locations in the WIO, of which the most prevalent haplotype was found in 40 individuals from 11 different locations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWithin the Western Indian Ocean, three groups can be distinguished: (1) north of Madagascar, (2) south-west Madagascar together with Nacala in northern Mozambique, and (3) all other sites along the coast of northern Mozambique, Tanzania, and Kenya.
“Within the WIO, three groups can be distinguished inhabiting (1) the north of Madagascar, (2) the south-west of Madagascar together with one site in northern Mozambique (Nacala) and (3) all other sites along the coast of northern Mozambique, Tanzania and Kenya.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThis study showed that the Northern Mozambique Channel region is split by contemporary dispersal barriers, probably caused by the short pelagic larval duration of S. hystrix, with northern Madagascar isolated by local cyclonic eddies and Mozambique and Tanzania influenced by southward moving anticyclonic eddies in the channel.
“However, this study also showed that the NMC region is in fact split by contemporary dispersal barriers, probably caused by the short PLD of S. hystrix, with on one side northern Madagascar isolated by local cyclonic eddies and on the other side Mozambique and Tanzania influenced by southward moving anticyclonic eddies in the channel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe observed restricted connectivity patterns can be explained by the short pelagic larval duration of S. hystrix and/or by oceanographic factors such as Mozambique Channel eddies, which retain larvae in northern Madagascar but facilitate dispersal from northern Mozambique to south-west Madagascar.
“These patterns of restricted connectivity could be explained by the short pelagic larval duration of S. hystrix, and/or by oceanographic factors, such as eddies in the Mozambique Channel (causing larval retention in northern Madagascar but facilitating dispersal from northern Mozambique towards south-west Madagascar).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Brooding corals generally have shorter pelagic larval durations and consequently higher genetic subdivision than broadcast spawning corals.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenStatistical significance for all pairwise tests was adjusted for multiple comparisons using a Bonferroni correction.
“Statistical significance for all pairwise tests was adjusted for multiple comparisons using a Bonferroni correction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationMicro-Checker was used to check for microsatellite null alleles and scoring errors.
“Micro-Checker 2.2.3 (van Oosterhout et al. 2004) was used to check for microsatellite null alleles and scoring errors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van Oosterhout et al. 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe two non-significant comparisons can probably be explained by smaller sample sizes at those sites.
“which can probably be explained by smaller sample sizes in these sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataBecause only two sample sites, Salary and Toliara, were analysed in the Southern Mozambique Channel, those results were not included in the discussion.
“However, since only two sample sites (Salary and Toliara) were analysed in SMC, these results are not included in the discussion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationS. hystrix is a brooding coral that releases planula larvae year-round in the tropics and has a short pelagic larval duration of 6-12 hours to one week in aquarium experiments.
“S. hystrix is a brooding coral that releases planula larvae year-round in the tropics and has a short PLD ranging from 6-12 h to 1 week in aquarium experiments (Baird 2001;Isomura and Nishihira 2001;Prasetia et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBecause null alleles were suspected for only two loci, each at a single site, all loci were included in subsequent analyses.
“Null alleles were only suspected for two loci, each for a single site, therefore all loci were included in subsequent data analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe identical multilocus genotypes were most likely caused by colony fragmentation, so only one individual per multilocus genotype was retained in later analyses.
“As these individuals were most likely the result of the fragmentation of a colony, only one individual from each multilocus genotype was kept in ensuing analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRed Sea S. hystrix shows low differentiation over 610 km (FST = 0.089).
“Low differentiation was found in the Red Sea over a distance of 610 km, (F ST = 0.089; Maier et al. 2005)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maier et al. 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenRed Sea populations of S. hystrix could belong to a different species than Western Indian Ocean populations, which should be the basis for further integrated taxonomy studies.
“Red Sea populations of S. hystrix could belong to a different species than the populations in the WIO, which should form the basis for further integrated taxonomy studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSouthern Northern Mozambique Channel sites share a similar genetic signature due to larval exchange between northern Mozambique and Mikindani and further transport from Mikindani to Mafia, with high connectivity between Mikindani and Mafia supported by lower pairwise FST values.
“Since the southern sites are part of the NMC region, they present a similar genetic signature caused by an exchange of larvae between northern Mozambique and Mikindani, and further transport of larvae from Mikindani to Mafia, with high genetic connectivity between Mikindani and Mafia supported by lower pairwise F ST values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe same pattern was suggested for A. tenuis and is supported by the strong resemblance in coral species diversity between these sites.
“This pattern was also suggested for A. tenuis (van der Ven et al. 2016) and is supported by the strong resemblance in coral species diversity between these sites (Obura 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the cited East African coral studies, overall genetic differentiation between sites was much lower than in S. hystrix, and no isolation-by-distance was detected.
“Although the overall level of genetic differentiation between sites in these studies was substantially lower than in the case of S. hystrix and no isolation-by-distance was found.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationS. hystrix has a short pelagic larval duration, leading to high self-recruitment with most larvae settling within 100 m of the mother colony in north-west Australia, though longer dispersal can occur.
“S. hystrix has a short PLD, resulting in high levels of self-recruitment with the majority of larvae settling within 100 m of their mother colony in north-west Australia (Underwood et al. 2007), although longer distance dispersal can occur (van Oppen et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe lower mean FST in the Red Sea can be attributed to the close proximity of most sample sites and the use of only three microsatellite loci.
“but the lower mean F ST value can be explained by the proximity of most of the sample sites, e.g., ∼0.15 km and the use of only three microsatellite loci.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Red Sea is a marine biodiversity hotspot with high endemism, including 5.5% of scleractinian coral species, 10% of crustaceans, 8.1% of echinoderms and 14.1% of fish.
“The Red Sea is a marine biodiversity hotspot with a high percentage of endemic species (5.5% of scleractinian corals species, 10% of crustaceans, 8.1% of echinoderms and 14.1% of fish; DiBattista et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DiBattista et al. 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationS. hystrix on the Great Barrier Reef and in northern Western Australia shows comparable differentiation (mean FST = 0.20 over about 500 km), including isolation-by-distance (overall FST = 0.198 over about 505 km).
“Comparable levels of differentiation were found for S. hystrix on the Great Barrier Reef and in northern Western Australia (mean F ST = 0.20 ∼500 km, van Oppen et al. 2008), including isolation-by-distance (overall F ST = 0.198 ∼505 km, Underwood et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationComplex oceanographic patterns influence coral reef communities because coral species differ in sensitivity to temperature anomalies: the East African Coast Current along Tanzania and Kenya has more frequent temperature fluctuations, while the South Equatorial Current stabilises temperature in the region.
“These complex oceanographic patterns also influence coral reef communities, because of the differences in sensitivity to temperature anomalies between coral species: the EACC along the coast of Tanzania and Kenya shows more frequent temperature fluctuations, while the SEC has a stabilising influence on the temperature in the region (McClanahan et al. 2011(McClanahan et al. , 2007b(McClanahan et al”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe higher allelic richness in the Northern Mozambique Channel is consistent with the region's higher coral cover and diversity, which can be explained by current patterns (inflow of the South Equatorial Current transporting larvae), high connectivity from mixing in Northern Mozambique Channel eddies, and lower environmental stress than north of the region.
“These results are consistent with the higher coral cover and diversity found in the NMC, which can be explained by current patterns (such as the inflow of the SEC transporting larvae) combined with the high connectivity caused by mixing in the NMC eddies, and lower environmental stress than north of the NMC (McClanahan et al. 2014;Obura 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCorals in the Red Sea experience dispersal barriers such as eddies in the central Red Sea and turbidity in the southern Red Sea.
“In addition to historical barriers, corals in the Red Sea experience dispersal barriers such as eddies in the central Red Sea region as well as turbidity in the southern Red Sea (Roberts et al. 1992).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Roberts et al. 1992 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStrong isolation of Red Sea populations from the Western Indian Ocean has previously been reported for corals, fishes, arthropods, echinoderms, molluscs and sponges, although some studies found no barriers for some fish species.
“Strong isolation of Red Sea populations from the WIO has been previously reported for corals (Pinzón et al. 2013), fishes (discussed, e.g., in Froukh and Kochzius 2008;DiBattista et al. 2013DiBattista et al. , 2016)), arthropods (e.g., Iacchei et al. 2016), echinoderms (Vogler et al. 2008), molluscs (e.g., Hui et al. 2016) and sponges (Wörheide et al. 2008), although some studies found no”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe sampling design did not include intermediate reefs, and the preliminary species result is based on a single marker, ITS2, for which paralogs could not be ruled out.
“However, our sampling design did not include intermediate reefs and this preliminary result is based on a single marker (ITS2), for which the occurrence of paralogs could not be ruled out in this study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningStrong isolation through historical and contemporary barriers could have resulted in speciation and a subsequent interspecies boundary.
“Strong isolation through historical and contemporary barriers could have resulted in a speciation and a subsequent interspecies boundary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese contemporary dispersal barriers can be explained by the short pelagic larval duration of S. hystrix and by oceanographic conditions, such as Mozambique Channel eddies causing larval retention in northern Madagascar, while the northbound East African Coast Current likely facilitates higher connectivity along the northern East African Coast.
“These patterns of contemporary dispersal barriers can be explained by the short PLD of S. hystrix and by oceanographic conditions, such as eddies in the Mozambique Channel causing larval retention in northern Madagascar, while the prevailing northbound EACC likely facilitates higher connectivity along the northern EAC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese oceanographic patterns could explain the higher abundance of temperature-sensitive taxa such as acroporids and pocilloporids in the Northern Mozambique Channel, although variable bleaching did occur there.
“This could explain the higher abundance of temperature-sensitive taxa, such as acroporids and pocilloporids in the NMC, although variable levels of bleaching did occur in this region, for instance in Mayotte (Eriksson et al. 2012;Marshall and Baird 2000;McClanahan et al. 2014;Obura 2012;Obura et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPocilloporids have low tolerance to elevated sea surface temperatures and suffered substantial losses during the 1998 El Niño in the Western Indian Ocean, with up to 100% mortality on some Kenyan reefs.
“Pocilloporids exhibit a low tolerance to elevated sea surface temperatures (Marshall and Baird 2000) and suffered substantial losses during the 1998 El Niño in the WIO (Wilkinson 2002), with up to 100 % mortality on some reefs in Kenya (McClanahan et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe north-south distinction may be explained by oceanographic conditions: northern sites are under year-round East African Coast Current influence, while southern sites are in the Northern Mozambique Channel influenced by Mozambique Channel eddies, the South Equatorial Current bifurcation, and the transition of the South Equatorial Current into the East African Coast Current.
“This distinction between sites may be explained by different oceanographic conditions.The northern sites are under year-round influence of the EACC, while the southern sites are part of the NMC with influence of the Mozambique Channel eddies, the bifurcation of the SEC in front of the African continent and the transition of the SEC into the EACC (Lutjeharms and Bornman 2010;Schott and McCreary 200”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationReefs further south in the Northern Mozambique Channel appear to have avoided conditions that trigger bleaching and still support bleaching-susceptible coral taxa.
“However, reefs further south within the NMC seem to have evaded environmental conditions triggering bleaching events and still support bleaching-susceptible coral taxa (McClanahan et al. 2007a(McClanahan et al. , 2014)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites McClanahan et al. 2007a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites McClanahan et al. 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA larval dispersal modelling study partly supports the results, finding strong southward dispersal and transport in Mozambique Channel eddies for larvae released from sites south of Pemba, although it did not include sites south of Nacala.
“These results are also partly supported by a larval dispersal modelling study (Gamoyo et al. 2019), in which strong southward dispersal and subsequent transport in the Mozambique Channel eddies were found for larvae released from sites south of Pemba (Mozambique), although this study did not include sites south of Nacala.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gamoyo et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe strong genetic population structure found in this study is congruent with findings for the same species in Australia and Japan, and for other brooding corals with a similarly short pelagic larval duration.
“The strong genetic population structure in this study is congruent with findings for the same species from other biogeographic regions such as Australia (van Oppen et al. 2008;Underwood et al. 2009) and Japan (Nakajima et al. 2017), as well as for other brooding corals with a similarly short PLD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMolluscs, arthropods, and fishes in the region also show genetic connectivity without a clear genetic break.
“Genetic connectivity without a clear genetic break was also found in molluscs (Ratsimbazafy and Kochzius 2018;Nehemia et al. 2019), arthropods (Rumisha et al. 2017) and fishes (Huyghe and Kochzius 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDifferent dispersal models support isolation of northern Madagascar, showing that coral larvae released from north-west Madagascar are mostly self-recruiting, especially for short-PLD species such as S. hystrix.
“Different dispersal models support this isolation, showing that coral larvae released from north-west Madagascar are mostly selfrecruiting, which is especially true for coral species with a short PLD such as S. hystrix (Crochelet et al. 2016;Gamoyo et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Crochelet et al. 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gamoyo et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationNo bottleneck was detected, but false negatives cannot be ruled out because of small sample sizes and limited statistical power in this dataset.
“Although no bottleneck was detected, we cannot exclude false negatives caused by small sample sizes and subsequent limited statistical power in this data set (Peery et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peery et al. 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Northern Mozambique Channel is considered a priority region for conservation and management because it has high coral cover and species richness, probably caused by historical high connectivity and low or geographically variable environmental stress.
“The NMC is considered a priority region for conservation and management efforts, as this region is high in coral cover and species richness, probably caused by historical high connectivity and low or geographically variable levels of environmental stress (McClanahan et al. 2007a(McClanahan et al. , 2014;;Obura 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationComparing brooding corals with broadcast spawning corals that have longer pelagic larval duration shows the importance of reproductive strategy for connectivity, with substantially lower differentiation in broadcast spawning corals in the same region (e.g., A. tenuis) or other regions (e.g., Acropora digitifera in Japan).
“When comparing brooding corals with broadcast spawning corals with longer PLD, the importance of the reproduction strategy on connectivity is shown, with substantially lower levels of differentiation found in the broadcast spawning coral in the same region, e.g., A. tenuis (van der Ven et al. 2016), or other biogeographic regions, e.g., Acropora digitifera in Japan (Nakajima et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA biophysical modelling study by Crochelet et al. (2016) identified several sites in the Northern Mozambique Channel as particularly essential for larval connectivity, and suggested Geyser Bank and Cosmoledo as priority sites for marine protected areas within the Mozambique Channel.
“In a biophysical modelling study, Crochelet et al. (2016) appointed several sites in this region that are particularly essential for the connectivity of larvae, and Geyser Bank and Cosmoledo were suggested as priority sites for MPAs within the Mozambique Channel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Crochelet et al. 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSubstantial differences in spatial scales can be expected even within functional and taxonomically similar assemblages such as corals.
“However, substantial differences in spatial scales can be expected, even within functional and taxonomically similar assemblages, such as corals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Connectivity and genetic structure of coral populations are poorly known, and this lack of knowledge is the main limitation preventing adequate conservation measures.
“The main limitation that prevents the implementation of adequate conservation measures is that the connectivity and genetic structure of coral populations are poorly known.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Studies on coral connectivity within or between major biogeographical regions of the Western Indian Ocean and the Red Sea are not available, because research has been limited to smaller geographical scales.
“To date, studies on coral connectivity patterns within or between major biogeographical regions of the WIO and the Red Sea are not available, as research tends to be limited to smaller geographical scales.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Brooding corals generally have shorter pelagic larval durations and consequently higher genetic subdivision than broadcast spawning corals.
“Brooding corals are generally assumed to have a shorter PLD and consequently higher levels of genetic subdivision than found in broadcast spawning corals, but current evidence for this is limited.”
Cites
Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · Cited by 33,871 · see citing works
Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study
Evanno, G., Regnaut, S., & Goudet, J. (2005) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02553.x · Cited by 21,540 · see citing works
ESTIMATING F -STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE
Weir, B. S., & Cockerham, C. C. (1984) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x · Cited by 18,909 · see citing works
Peakall, R., & Smouse, P. E. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460 · Cited by 13,165 · see citing works
Earl, D. A., & vonHoldt, B. M. (2011) · Conservation Genetics Resources · doi:10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7 · Cited by 12,389 · see citing works
VAN OOSTERHOUT, C., HUTCHINSON, W. F., WILLS, D. P. M., & SHIPLEY, P. (2004) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x · Cited by 10,327 · see citing works
adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers
Jombart, T. (2008) · Bioinform. · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129 · Cited by 7,788 · see citing works
FSTAT (Version 1.2): A Computer Program to Calculate F-Statistics
Goudet, J. (1995) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111627 · Cited by 7,639 · see citing works
A New Statistical Method for Haplotype Reconstruction from Population Data
Stephens, M., Smith, N. J. C., & Donnelly, P. (2001) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/319501 · Cited by 7,460 · see citing works
The interplay between habitat availability and population differentiation
Verkuil, Y. I., Piersma, T., Jukema, J., Zwarts, L., Baker, A. J., & Hooijmeijer, J. C. E. W. (2012) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · Cited by 6,547 · see citing works
Changes in the global value of ecosystem services
Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R. K. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002 · Cited by 6,322 · see citing works
Cornuet, J. M., & Luikart, G. (1996) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/144.4.2001 · Cited by 4,365 · see citing works
Marine Ecoregions of the World: A Bioregionalization of Coastal and Shelf Areas
Spalding, M. D., Fox, H. E., Allen, G. R., Davidson, N., Ferdaña, Z. A., Finlayson, M., Halpern, B. S., Jorge, M. A., Lombana, A., Lourie, S. A., et al. (2007) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/b570707 · Cited by 4,084 · see citing works
Hardy, O. J., & Vekemans, X. (2002) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00305.x · Cited by 3,562 · see citing works
<i>G</i> <sub>ST</sub> and its relatives do not measure differentiation
JOST, L. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03887.x · Cited by 2,435 · see citing works
Larval Dispersal and Marine Population Connectivity
Cowen, R. K., & Sponaugle, S. (2009) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163757 · Cited by 2,077 · see citing works
The monsoon circulation of the Indian Ocean
Schott, F. A., & McCreary, J. P. (2001) · Progress in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/s0079-6611(01)00083-0 · Cited by 1,798 · see citing works
Sea-level fluctuations during the last glacial cycle
Siddall, M., Rohling, E. J., Almogi-Labin, A., Hemleben, C., Meischner, D., Schmelzer, I., & Smeed, D. A. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01690 · Cited by 1,626 · see citing works
Waits, L. P., Luikart, G., & Taberlet, P. (2001) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01185.x · Cited by 1,437 · see citing works
Accounting for Decay of Linkage Disequilibrium in Haplotype Inference and Missing-Data Imputation
Stephens, M., & Scheet, P. A. (2005) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/428594 · Cited by 1,337 · see citing works
POPULATION GENETICS, DEMOGRAPHIC CONNECTIVITY, AND THE DESIGN OF MARINE RESERVES
Palumbi, S. R. (2003) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0146:pgdcat]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,192 · see citing works
Bleaching of corals on the Great Barrier Reef: differential susceptibilities among taxa
Marshall, P. A., & Baird, A. H. (2000) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s003380000086 · Cited by 1,046 · see citing works
Coral Reef Ecosystems under Climate Change and Ocean Acidification
Hoegh‐Guldberg, O., Poloczanska, E. S., Skirving, W., & Dove, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2017.00158 · Cited by 942 · see citing works
Reliability of genetic bottleneck tests for detecting recent population declines
PEERY, M. Z., KIRBY, R., REID, B. N., STOELTING, R., DOUCET‐BËER, E., ROBINSON, S., VÁSQUEZ‐CARRILLO, C., PAULI, J. N., & PALSBØLL, P. J. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05635.x · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Species Richness on Coral Reefs and the Pursuit of Convergent Global Estimates
Fisher, R., O’Leary, R. A., Low‐Choy, S., Mengersen, K. L., Knowlton, N., Brainard, R. E., & Caley, M. J. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.12.022 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Microsatellite Allele Sizes: A Simple Test to Assess Their Significance on Genetic Differentiation
Hardy, O. J., Charbonnel, N., Fréville, H., et al. (2003) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/163.4.1467 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
seqphase : a web tool for interconverting phase input/output files and fasta sequence alignments
Flot, J. (2009) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02732.x · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Self-citationSexual Reproduction of Scleractinian Corals
Harrison, P. L. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0114-4_6 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Hybridization and the Evolution of Reef Coral Diversity
Vollmer, S. V., & Palumbi, S. R. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069524 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
EFFECTS OF CLIMATE AND SEAWATER TEMPERATURE VARIATION ON CORAL BLEACHING AND MORTALITY
McClanahan, T. R., Ateweberhan, M., Muhando, C. A., Maina, J. M., & Mohammed, M. S. (2007) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/06-1182.1 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Western Indian Ocean coral communities: bleaching responses and susceptibility to extinction
McClanahan, T. R., Ateweberhan, M., Graham, N., Wilson, S. K., Sebastián, C., Guillaume, M. M. M., & Bruggemann, J. H. (2007) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps337001 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Guidelines for DNA taxonomy, with a focus on the meiofauna
Fontaneto, D., Flot, J., & Tang, C. Q. (2015) · Marine Biodiversity · doi:10.1007/s12526-015-0319-7 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Self-citationMcClanahan, T., Muthiga, N., & Mangi, S. (2001) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s003380000133 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
A review of contemporary patterns of endemism for shallow water reef fauna in the Red Sea
DiBattista, J. D., Roberts, M. B., Bouwmeester, J., Bowen, B. W., Coker, D. J., Lozano‐Cortés, D. F., Howard Choat, J., Gaither, M. R., Hobbs, J. A., Khalil, M. T., et al. (2016) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12649 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Self-citationConservation genetics and the resilience of reef‐building corals
van Oppen, M. J. H., & Gates, R. D. (2006) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.03026.x · Cited by 250 · see citing works
The future of resilience-based management in coral reef ecosystems
Mcleod, E., Anthony, K. R. N., Mumby, P. J., Maynard, J. A., Beeden, R., Graham, N. A. J., Heron, S. F., Hoegh‐Guldberg, O., Jupiter, S. D., MacGowan, P., et al. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.034 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
The hitchhiker's guide to single‐locus species delimitation
Dellicour, S., & Flot, J. (2018) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12908 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citationUNDERWOOD, J. N., SMITH, L. D., VAN OPPEN, M. J. H., & GILMOUR, J. P. (2007) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.03187.x · Cited by 231 · see citing works
The Diversity and Biogeography of Western Indian Ocean Reef-Building Corals
Obura, D. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045013 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Schmidt‐Roach, S., Miller, K. J., Lundgren, P. B., & Andreakis, N. (2014) · Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/zoj.12092 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Sofianos, S. S., & Johns, W. E. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2001jc001185 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Doyle, J. J. (1995) · Systematic Botany · doi:10.2307/2419811 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Van OPPEN, M. J. H., BONGAERTS, P., UNDERWOOD, J. N., PEPLOW, L. M., & COOPER, T. F. (2011) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05050.x · Cited by 183 · see citing works
DNA BARCODING: Barcoding corals: limited by interspecific divergence, not intraspecific variation
Shearer, T. L., & Coffroth, M. A. (2007) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01996.x · Cited by 182 · see citing works
A threat to coral reefs multiplied? Four species of crown-of-thorns starfish
Vogler, C., Benzie, J., Lessios, H. A., Barber, P. H., & Wörheide, G. (2008) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0454 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Pinzón, J. H., Sampayo, E., Cox, E., Chauka, L. J., Chen, C. A., Voolstra, C. R., & LaJeunesse, T. C. (2013) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12110 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Ecologically relevant dispersal of corals on isolated reefs: implications for managing resilience
Underwood, J. N., Smith, L. D., Oppen, M. J. H. V., & Gilmour, J. P. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/07-1461.1 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Dellicour, S., & Flot, J. (2015) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu130 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationFlot, J.-F., Couloux, A., & Tillier, S. (2010) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-372 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationPhase determination from direct sequencing of length‐variable DNA regions
Flot, J., Tillier, A., Samadi, S., & Tillier, S. (2006) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01355.x · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Self-citationFlot, J., & Tillier, S. (2007) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2007.07.006 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Self-citationSize variation of planulae and its effect on the lifetime of planulae in three pocilloporid corals
Isomura, N., & Nishihira, M. (2001) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s003380100180 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
DiBattista, J. D., Berumen, M. L., Gaither, M. R., Rocha, L. A., Eble, J. A., Choat, J. H., Craig, M. T., Skillings, D. J., & Bowen, B. W. (2013) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12068 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Large-Scale Variation in Assemblage Structure of Red Sea Butterflyfishes and Angelfishes
Roberts, C. M., Shepherd, A. R. D., & Ormond, R. F. G. (1992) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.2307/2845449 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
champuru 1.0: a computer software for unraveling mixtures of two DNA sequences of unequal lengths
Flot, J. (2007) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01857.x · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationWörheide, G., Epp, L. S., & Macis, L. (2008) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-24 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Warner, P. A., van Oppen, M. J. H., & Willis, B. L. (2015) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13225 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Erickson, K. L., Pentico, A., Quattrini, A. M., et al. (2020) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13241 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Genetic Traces of Recent Long-Distance Dispersal in a Predominantly Self-Recruiting Coral
van Oppen, M. J. H., Lutz, A., De'ath, G., Peplow, L., & Kininmonth, S. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003401 · Cited by 97 · cited 5× · see citing works
“The strong genetic population structure in this study is congruent with findings for the same species from other biogeographic regions such as Australia (van Oppen et al. 2008; Underwood et al. 2009) and Japan (Nakajima et al. 2017), as well as for other brooding corals with a similarly short PLD.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBiogeography and Change among Regional Coral Communities across the Western Indian Ocean
McClanahan, T. R., Ateweberhan, M., Darling, E. S., Graham, N. A. J., & Muthiga, N. A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093385 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Gene Flow and Genetic Diversity of a Broadcast-Spawning Coral in Northern Peripheral Populations
Nakajima, Y., Nishikawa, A., Iguchi, A., & Sakai, K. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011149 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
McCLANAHAN, T. R., MAINA, J. M., & MUTHIGA, N. A. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02395.x · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Isolation by distance in the scleractinian coral Seriatopora hystrix from the Red Sea
Maier, E., Tollrian, R., Rinkevich, B., & Nürnberger, B. (2005) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-005-0013-6 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Richards, Z. T., Berry, O., & van Oppen, M. J. H. (2016) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-015-0807-0 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Hui, M., Krämer, W. E., Seidel, C., Nuryanto, ., Joshi, A., & Kochzius, M. (2016) · Journal of Molluscan Studies · doi:10.1093/mollus/eyw001 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationDana, J. D., & States., U. (1846) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.70845 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Species Delimitation's Coming of Age: Figure 1.
Flot, J. (2015) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syv071 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetic connectivity patterns of Pocillopora verrucosa in southern African Marine Protected Areas
Ridgway, T. M., Riginos, C., Davis, J., et al. (2008) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps07245 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Crochelet, E., Roberts, J., Lagabrielle, E., Obura, D., Petit, M., & Chabanet, P. (2016) · Regional Studies in Marine Science · doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2016.06.007 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Estimating Connectivity Through Larval Dispersal in the Western Indian Ocean
Gamoyo, M. J., Obura, D. O., & Reason, C. J. C. (2019) · Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2019jg005128 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
HaplowebMaker and CoMa: Two web tools to delimit species using haplowebs and conspecificity matrices
Spöri, Y., & Flot, J. (2020) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13454 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationAdjeroud, M., Guérécheau, A., Vidal‐Dupiol, J., Flot, J., Arnaud‐Haond, S., & Bonhomme, F. (2013) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-013-2355-9 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationArrigoni, R., Berumen, M. L., Mariappan, K. G., Beck, P. S. A., Hulver, A. M., Montano, S., Pichon, M., Strona, G., Terraneo, T. I., & Benzoni, F. (2020) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-020-01924-8 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Kochzius, M., & Blohm, D. H. (2005) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2004.12.032 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationAccurate population genetic measurements require cryptic species identification in corals
Sheets, E. A., Warner, P. A., & Palumbi, S. R. (2018) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-018-1679-9 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
United States Exploring Expedition
(2000) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/bean11132-033 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Surface drifter trajectories highlight flow pathways in the Mozambique Channel
Hancke, L., Roberts, M. J., & Ternon, J. (2013) · Deep Sea Research Part II Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.10.014 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Prasetia, R., Sinniger, F., Hashizume, K., & Harii, S. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177034 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Patterns of genetic structuring in the coral Pocillopora damicornis on reefs in East Africa
Souter, P., Henriksson, O., Olsson, N., & Grahn, M. (2009) · BMC Ecology · doi:10.1186/1472-6785-9-19 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Iacchei, M. J., Gaither, M. R., Bowen, B. W., & Toonen, R. J. (2016) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12689 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
van der Ven, R. M., Triest, L., De Ryck, D. J. R., Mwaura, J. M., Mohammed, M. S., & Kochzius, M. (2016) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12643 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationFlot, J., Licuanan, W. Y., Nakano, Y., Payri, C. E., Cruaud, C., & Tillier, S. (2008) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-008-0407-2 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationUncovering a New Current: The Southwest MAdagascar Coastal Current
Ramanantsoa, J. D., Penven, P., Krug, M., Gula, J., & Rouault, M. (2018) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2017gl075900 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Huyghe, F., & Kochzius, M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193825 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationBaird, A. H. (2004) · Journal and proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales · doi:10.5962/p.361519 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Rumisha, C., Huyghe, F., Rapanoel, D., Mascaux, N., & Kochzius, M. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186817 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationCollins, C., Hermes, J. C., & Reason, C. J. C. (2014) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1002/2014jc010008 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Froukh, T., & Kochzius, M. (2008) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01746.x · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationNakajima, Y., Nishikawa, A., Iguchi, A., Nagata, T., Uyeno, D., Sakai, K., & Mitarai, S. (2017) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-017-1557-x · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Ratsimbazafy, H. A., & Kochzius, M. (2018) · Journal of Molluscan Studies · doi:10.1093/mollus/eyy001 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Northern Mozambique Channel
Obura, D. O., Bandeira, S., Bodin, N., Burgener, V., Braulik, G. T., Chassot, E., Gullström, M., Kochzius, M., Nicoll, M. A. C., Osuka, K. E., et al. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100853-9.00003-8 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationCoral responses to a repeat bleaching event in Mayotte in 2010
Obura, D. O., Bigot, L., & Benzoni, F. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.5305 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
The importance of the greater Agulhas Current is increasingly being recognised
Lutjeharms, J. R. E., & Bornman, T. G. (2010) · South African Journal of Science · doi:10.4102/sajs.v106i3/4.160 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Souter, P., & Grahn, M. (2008) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-007-0342-7 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Nehemia, A., Ngendu, Y., & Kochzius, M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2019.03.005 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationCoral bleaching and associated mortality in Mayotte, Western Indian Ocean
Eriksson, H., Wickel, J., & Jamon, A. (2012) · Cited by 13 · see citing works
First oceanographic survey of the entire continental shelf adjacent to the northern Agulhas Current
Lütjeharms, J. R. E., Durgadoo, J. V., Schapira, M., & McQuaid, C. D. (2010) · South African Journal of Science · doi:10.4102/sajs.v106i9/10.410 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The coral reefs of Bazaruto Island, Mozambique, with recommendations for their management
Schleyer, M. H., & Celliers, L. (2007) · Western Indian Ocean Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.4314/wiojms.v4i2.28492 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wilkinson C (2002) Status of coral reefs of the world. Coral Reef Monitoring Network, Townsville
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2020
(2021) · doi:10.59387/wotj9184 · Cited by 1,037 · see citing works
Speciation in marine environments: Diving under the surface
Faria, R., Johannesson, K., & Stankowski, S. (2021) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.13756 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Buitrago‐López, C., Cárdenas, A., Hume, B. C. C., Gosselin, T., Staubach, F., Aranda, M., Barshis, D. J., Sawall, Y., & Voolstra, C. R. (2023) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.16871 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationCorridors and barriers to marine connectivity around southern Africa
Lett, C., Malauene, B. S., Hoareau, T. B., Kaplan, D., & Porri, F. (2023) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps14312 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
van der Ven, R. M., Ratsimbazafy, H. A., & Kochzius, M. (2022) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-022-02220-3 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationvan der Ven, R. M., Heynderickx, H., & Kochzius, M. (2021) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-020-03813-8 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationBurt, A., Vogt-Vincent, N., Johnson, H. L., Sendell‐Price, A. T., Kelly, S. L., Clegg, S. M., Head, C. E. I., Bunbury, N., Fleischer‐Dogley, F., Jeremie, M.-M., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-55459-x · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Coral reef potential connectivity in the southwest Indian Ocean
Vogt-Vincent, N., Burt, A., van der Ven, R. M., & Johnson, H. L. (2024) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-024-02521-9 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationTerrana, L., Flot, J., & Eeckhaut, I. (2021) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-020-02049-8 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationRumisha, C. (2024) · African Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/aje.13259 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Huang, W., Chen, Y., Wu, Q., Feng, Y., Wang, Y., Lu, Z., Chen, J., Chen, B., Xiao, Z., Meng, L., et al. (2023) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115147 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Glynn, V. M., Vollmer, S. V., Kline, D. I., et al. (2023) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.14560 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Comparing modeled predictions of coral reef diversity along a latitudinal gradient in Mozambique
McClanahan, T. R., & Sola, E. (2024) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2024.1450383 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Rachmilovitz, E. N., Shaish, L., Douek, J., & Rinkevich, B. (2024) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2024.106580 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Coral reef potential connectivity in the southwest Indian OceanPreprint
Vogt-Vincent, N., Burt, A., van der Ven, R. M., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.11.23.568484 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationOry, D., Gravier‐Bonnet, N., Chabanet, P., Bourmaud, C. A.-F., & Boissin, É. (2025) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.70089 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Ory, D., Boissin, É., Bourmaud, C. A.-F., et al. (2025) · Zoologica Scripta · doi:10.1111/zsc.12737 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Duvane, J. A., Dupont, S., Sola, E., Ortega‐Martinez, O., & Pereyra, R. T. (2025) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-025-02679-w · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Rumisha, C. (2024) · Fisheries Management and Ecology · doi:10.1111/fme.12722 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Asymmetric genetic population structures at the range edges of a mangrove whelk
Hamamoto, K., Iguchi, A., Gibu, K., et al. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173248 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Gene flow throughout the evolutionary history of a polymorphic and generalist clownfishPreprint
Schmid, S. M., Salvy, M. B., Jiménez, A. G., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.19.563036 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ory, D., Jobet, E., Gravier‐Bonnet, N., Boissin, É., & Bourmaud, C. A.-F. (2026) · Marine Biodiversity · doi:10.1007/s12526-026-01715-4
Ani, C. J., Grimaldi, C. M., Cresswell, A. K., Iwanaga, T., & Robson, B. (2026) · Progress In Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2026.103793
Ory, D., Gravier‐Bonnet, N., Chabanet, P., Bourmaud, C. A.-F., & Boissin, É. (2025) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.72665
Mares‐Mayagoitia, J. A., Mejía‐Ruíz, P., la Cruz, F. L., et al. (2025) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.70913
山谷清香, 東祐圭, 若月, 大., 下島, 桐., 前澤秀之, 森敬善, 本田雄気, 清水信行, 浅野, 冬., 佐藤督忠, et al. (2009) · 日本心臓病学会誌
- Authors
- van der Ven, R. M., Flot, J.-F., Buitrago-López, C., & Kochzius, M.
- Affiliations
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- Venue
- Heredity
- Published
- 2020-10-29
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 351-365
- ISSN
- 0018-067X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2540
- PMC
- PMC8027388
- OpenAlex
- W3095983745
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Heredity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Essex
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science
- University of Oxford
- European Commission
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (J.0272.17)
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (grant 1501612N, 1501612N)
- State University of Zanzibar
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (OZR2068BOF)
- Vlaamse Interuniversitaire Raad
- Vlaamse regering
- Nature
- VLIRUOS
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
- Keywords
- Seriatopora hystrix, brooding corals, population structure, genetic differentiation, larval connectivity, coral reef conservation, microsatellite markers, Red Sea, Western Indian Ocean, Mozambique Channel, Madagascar, East Africa, coral reef degradation, conservation priority areas
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Genetics, Population, Indian Ocean, Anthozoa, Genetic Drift, Coral Reefs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-01.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-01.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review