Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DNA Damage and DNA Sequence Retrieval from Ancient Tissues

Hoss, M., Jaruga, P., Zastawny, T. H., Dizdaroglu, M., Paabo, S.·1996·Nucleic Acids Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/24.7.1304

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Postmortem alterations potentially hinder manipulation of ancient DNA and reduce the amount of retrievable genetic information.

    “These postmortem alterations potentially hinder the manipulation of aDNA and reduce the amount of retrievable genetic information 109,120 .”

    From Ancient DNA analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [120]

  • Authentication of genomic DNA from single individuals requires both the observation of post-mortem nucleotide misincorporation arising from cytosine deamination and the estimation of contaminating DNA based on heterozygosity levels found in haploid chromosomes.

    “Authentication of genomic DNA from single individuals (see below for authentication of microbial DNA) requires both the observation of post-mortem nucleotide misincorporation arising from cytosine deamination 57,120 (FIG.3A-H) and the estimation of contaminating DNA based on heterozygosity levels found in haploid chromosomes 54 (FIG.3I).”

    From Ancient DNA analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [120]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Hoss, 1996, PNAS, 93, 181, 10.1073/pnas.93.1.181 · DOI
  2. Dizdaroglu, 1992, Mutation Research, 275, 331, 10.1016/0921-8734(92)90036-O · DOI
  3. Paabo, 1989, PNAS, 86, 1939, 10.1073/pnas.86.6.1939 · DOI
  4. Dizdaroglu, 1991, Free radical biology & medicine, 10, 225, 10.1016/0891-5849(91)90080-M · DOI
  5. Hoss, 1993, Nucleic Acids Research, 21, 3913, 10.1093/nar/21.16.3913 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 1994, Nature; Physical Science (London), 370, 333
  7. Taylor, 1996, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13, 283, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025566 · DOI
  8. Dizdaroglu, 1994, Methods in enzymology, 234, 3, 10.1006/meth.1994.1002 · DOI
  9. 1995, 34, 737, 10.1021/bi00003a005 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Wagner, 1992, PNAS, 89, 3380, 10.1073/pnas.89.8.3380 · DOI
  11. 1985, 24, 4018, 10.1021/bi00336a032 · DOI
  12. Setlow, 1992, Journal of Bacteriology, 174, 2737, 10.1128/jb.174.9.2737-2741.1992 · DOI
  13. Potts, 1994, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 58, 755
  14. 1994, Experientia, 50, 524, 10.1007/BF01921720 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hoss, M., Jaruga, P., Zastawny, T. H., Dizdaroglu, M., & Paabo, S.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
1996-04-01
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
1304-1307
ISSN
  • 0305-1048
  • 1362-4962
Cited by
312
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review